+1-415-670-9189
info@expertsmind.com
Application of law to facts
Course:- Business Law and Ethics
Reference No.:- EM13262




Assignment Help
Expertsmind Rated 4.9 / 5 based on 47215 reviews.
Review Site
Assignment Help >> Business Law and Ethics

Question

Tweedle Pty Ltd is a company that lays down railway track in newly developing countries. A, B, C and D are the 4 directors of the company. The directors are the sole shareholder of the company, each director holding 25% of the shares.

A, B, and C have decided that for personality reasons they cannot continue to work with D. They have set up a new company, Needle Pty Ltd, from which D is excluded. When Tweedle Pty Ltd was approached by the South African government to build a new railway line, A, B and C secretly negotiated to have the government contact referred to Needle Pty Ltd.

D is now aware that the government contract has been referred to Needle and approaches you for advice.

Required:

(a) Have the 3 directors breached any duty they may have had to Tweedle?

(b) What remedies, if any, does D have in regard to the actions of A, B and C in taking work from Tweedle and transferring it to Needle?

Question

S, E and R are shareholders and directors of Z Pty Ltd (Company Z). Company Z owns a holiday house which it uses to rent out. Company's constitution states that:

  1. S is to be appointed as the company secretary for life
  2. Each shareholder can use the property for 2 weeks. For S, it will be from 1-14 January.

It was found that January is usually the busiest month and therefore E&R voted (through special resolution) to change S's usage to June. Constitution also requires users to keep the home clean after use. E does not clean the home and S always has to clean up. S complains to R about this.

E & R are getting annoyed with S. They called an extra ordinary shareholder's meeting and voted to change the constitution by requiring appointment as company secretary to be appointed by directors. They then called a directors' meeting to remove S as a secretary and director of the company.

Advise S

Question

Nong Pty Ltd held its annual general meeting on 6 November 2009. The notice of the meeting sent by Nong Pty Ltd includes the following item of special business:

"To consider and, if thought fit, pass the following resolution as an ordinary resolution:

'That commencing on 1 December 2009 the total amount that may be provided to the non-executive directors by way of remuneration for their services as directors in respect of each financial year be increased by the amount of $750,000 to the amount of $2,250,000 per financial year.'

Vince is a shareholder in Nong Pty Ltd. He thinks the non-executive directors are already overpaid and opposes the resolution. He attends the meeting and makes a long speech opposing it. After 20 minutes, David (a director) asks him to stop speaking and sit down. Is this allowed?




Put your comment
 
Minimize


Ask Question & Get Answers from Experts
Browse some more (Business Law and Ethics) Materials
Egypt was embroiled in a citizen-led political revolution for much of 2011. Long-time Egyptian president Hosni Mubarak has been one of the United States' strongest allies. M
What types of communications and information management systems can you utilize to ensure that psychological assistance is provided for first responders? Explain in detail.
‘‘For a dividend-paying stock, the tree for the stock price does not recombine; but the tree for the stock price less the present value of future dividends does recombine.''
Prepare a submission to the appropriate review Tribunal addressing its jurisdiction to review the decision and seeking that the original decision be set aside, including ref
You have just graduated from the AIU Online Criminal Justice program and acquired your dream career working with the National Criminal Justice Reference Service (NCJRS). Tra
Under our statue requiring that a petition disclose whether there are any children under ages of 16, making it obligatory upon the court to make such orders respecting custody
Where they are: The organization's current security and how they handle emergency situations, Where they should be: Where the organization should be with the level of their se
The court could choose either a preliminary hearing or a grand jury proceeding to establish probable cause for the felony charges in this case. Compare and contrast the two