Reference no: EM131229938
PLEASE REBUTTALAND ANSWER EACH OF THE FOLLOWING QUESTIONS OR POST STATEMENTS. MUST BE 150 WORDS (PLEASE), WRITE IN 3RD PERSON.ONLY ONE REFERENCE CAN BE USED FOR EACH ANSWER.
DQ 1
There have probably been many theories that have impacted the contemporary organizational design in all aspects of the dynamic of this particular design. The classical organizational design adheres to accommodating change in any given sections from a social science standpoint. There have also been businesses that have researched different ways to change, and communicate the material on different levels so they could move forward in a positive manner. According to Hill, Weistroffer& Aiken, (2005) many contemporary practitioners and organizational theorists predicted demise of the classical organizational design. However, the theory that has impacted the design has been classical organizational theory due to its ability to help with the communication between theorists at any given time during the course of their research. In addition, they have focus on organizational structure, high level performance actions, positive relationships between other groups, and development for better research. In today's society this theory is highly used for different organizations across the country.
Reference: Hill, Benard, Weistroffer, H. & Aiken, P. (2005). A Dynamic Simulation Comparing Classical and Emergent Network Models: Organization Design Implications. Journal of Computational & Mathematical Organization Theory 11 (1)
DQ 2
Perhaps the greatest impact to organizational theory to modern times is the work of theorist Fredrick Winslow Taylor. His 1911 seminal work, The Principles of Scientific Management, remains perhaps the most influential management work in the 21st century (Giannantonio& Hurley-Hanson, 2011). One can observe Taylor's Scientific Management Theory in contemporary organizations to increase efficiency through management practices (Giannantonio& Hurley-Hanson, 2011). Even though some argue that Taylor's Scientific Management Theory failed to address the human factor, Derksen (2014) argued that humanization was a successive transformation from ‘Taylorism' to industrial psychologist some thirty years later. However, Fredrick Taylor stated in Shop Management in 1903, "knowing exactly what people wish to do and supervising them so that they realize this in the best and cheapest way" (quoted in Iclodean, 2015, p. 391) suggests a degree of humanization. While this quote seems simplistic in delivery, many mangers today look for the best ways to use human resources in the most efficient and cost effective way.
References:
Derksen, M. (2014). Turning Men into Machines? Scientific Management, Industrial Psychology, and the 'Human Factor'. Journal of The History of The Behavioral Sciences, 50(2), 148-165. doi:10.1002/jhbs.21650
Giannantonio, C. M., & Hurley-Hanson, A. E. (2011). Frederick Winslow Taylor: Reflections on the Relevance of the Principles of Scientific Management 100 Years Later. Journal of Business & Management, 17(1), 7-10.
Iclodean (Iclodean-Lazar), C. F. (2015). The Efficiency of the Management in Operationalization of the Integrated Information System, the Productivity of the Informatic Systems. Review of Management & Economic Engineering, 14(2), 390-400.
DQ 3
Perhaps the greatest impact to organizational theory to modern times is the work of theorist Fredrick Winslow Taylor. His 1911 seminal work, The Principles of Scientific Management, remains perhaps the most influential management work in the 21st century (Giannantonio& Hurley-Hanson, 2011). One can observe Taylor's Scientific Management Theory in contemporary organizations to increase efficiency through management practices (Giannantonio& Hurley-Hanson, 2011). Even though some argue that Taylor's Scientific Management Theory failed to address the human factor, Derksen (2014) argued that humanization was a successive transformation from ‘Taylorism' to industrial psychologist some thirty years later. However, Fredrick Taylor stated in Shop Management in 1903, "knowing exactly what people wish to do and supervising them so that they realize this in the best and cheapest way" (quoted in Iclodean, 2015, p. 391) suggests a degree of humanization. While this quote seems simplistic in delivery, many mangers today look for the best ways to use human resources in the most efficient and cost effective way.
References:
Derksen, M. (2014). Turning Men into Machines? Scientific Management, Industrial Psychology, and the 'Human Factor'. Journal of The History of The Behavioral Sciences, 50(2), 148-165. doi:10.1002/jhbs.21650
Giannantonio, C. M., & Hurley-Hanson, A. E. (2011). Frederick Winslow Taylor: Reflections on the Relevance of the Principles of Scientific Management 100 Years Later. Journal of Business & Management, 17(1), 7-10.
Iclodean (Iclodean-Lazar), C. F. (2015). The Efficiency of the Management in Operationalization of the Integrated Information System, the Productivity of the Informatic Systems. Review of Management & Economic Engineering, 14(2), 390-400.
Attachment:- dq1-o2part2.rar