Provide as many details as you can for your solution

Assignment Help Other Subject
Reference no: EM131343798


Dying for a Coke or Pepsi

"Moral Relativity" suggests that right and wrong are a matter of personal opinion, and because everyone is entitled to his or her own opinion, there really is nothing that is truly right or truly wrong; the best that a Moral Relativist can do is find enough people who have similar opinions and then make laws based on a majority consensus. But, even the majority opinion might change in a few years, and then the Moral Relativists running the government would have to revise the laws of accepted behavior. In practice, a Moral Relativists goal is to persuade the majority to agree with a certain opinion or view, even if others hold a different initial opinion (since right and wrong are not hard and fast). On the other side, people who believe that some things are definitely right and some things are definitely wrong (according to Moral Relativists) should be regarded as narrow-minded "fanatics."

Choose one of the two scenarios below and explain your position.

Scenario #1:

Suppose that you lived in a society in which the population was doubling every fifty years, but the food production was increasing by only 80% during the same time period--meaning that in a few generations, the population would grossly exceed the amount of available food.

• Keeping in mind that a Moral Relativist would say that our notions of killing people or even just letting them starve are neither right or wrong (since those are just "opinions"), how would you resolve this over-population and lack of resources problem? Provide as many details as you can for your solution, and explain your "justification" for whatever action you think would be the best solution, even if your "solution" is to take no overt action.

• The point of the Moral Relativist would be that what was right yesterday might be wrong today. So, what would you propose, and how would you defend it?

Scenario #2:

If the idea of killing people or letting them die is too far outside your realm of thinking, we have an alternative scenario. You are the Presidential Advisor of Carbonated Beverages, and the Supreme Court has declared that only one carbonated beverage can be considered the official soft drink of the United States. Naturally, everyone has an opinion about which one is "the best" soda-whether it is Coke, Pepsi, Mountain Dew, A&W Root Beer, and so forth. You have two choices: (1) you can go back to the Supreme Court and make the argument that no one should be forced to choose single soft drink for the whole country and that all opinions should be valid (and provide a lot of good reasons for why there is no right or wrong "best" soda), or (2) you could pick one soft drink and explain why you are forcing the entire nation to comply with your particular choice (which, incidentally, would be the definition of "fanaticism," according to the Moral Relativists).

• So, which choice would you make, and how would you defend it?

Incidentally, this looks like the easiest scenario of the two choices, but it is not, since "different kinds of soda" is actually a euphemism for "ways to die" as we reduce the population numbers from the first scenario.

Reference no: EM131343798

Decisions a person makes when the choice is not obvious

Aristotle defined character as “the decisions a person makes when the choice is not obvious.” Another well know definition of character is the way we act when no one is lookin

Discuss about the aggression and violence

Discuss the effectiveness of at least two (2) of the steps to reduce aggression and violence.Explain at least two (2) ways the rates and forms of violence differ based on cul

Explain the guideline for business transactions

For centuries the guideline for business transactions was the Latin term caveat emptor. Have you ever had an incident where you felt you were tricked or misled by the salesper

Recognize three barriers to services planning and funding

Recognize three barriers to services, planning, funding, or empowerment in the selected aspect of human services. How can applications of technology be utilized as the means t

Study of conformity-compliance-obedience or acceptance

The study of conformity involves why people are likely to change their behaviors or beliefs as a result of real or imagined group pressure. There are three types of conformity

Characterize the plays written by shakespeare

Use a rudimentary characterization of authors' uses of words to identify the authors of unknown works. We will use dictionaries and simple statistics (really just ratios) to

Effectiveness of the international labor organization

Write 2 pages essay where in you consider the effectiveness of the International Labor Organization (ILO) in regulating the activities of multinational businesses in the tre

Discuss history of affirmative action in the united states

Briefly discuss the history of affirmative action in the United States. Then answer the following questions: Do you think affirmative action programs are still necessary


Write a Review

Free Assignment Quote

Assured A++ Grade

Get guaranteed satisfaction & time on delivery in every assignment order you paid with us! We ensure premium quality solution document along with free turntin report!

All rights reserved! Copyrights ©2019-2020 ExpertsMind IT Educational Pvt Ltd