Thanks to such an extent! I welcome the brief reactions and the expert client service all of you give. I will SURELY utilize all of you later on and I have suggested that my beau use all of you, and he is. He just got his quote yesterday since he needs examine help with his article. Once more, much obliged!

I just made the payment. Please let me know when you get it. my responsibility is to focus on a detailed security plan for the Nuclear Reactors, Materials, and Waste Sector, from a TECHNICAL SECURITY perspective (like how you would secure the sector from an attack on the data, database, information, software etc.) It should not focus more on physical security, not technical, which will not be correct and wont meet the requirement. Ok. Please let the expert know that one of the requirements also says: "Use NIST SP800-53 Rev. 4 as a guide for defining how you would secure the CI Sector from a Personnel, Physical, and Technical point of view." So my part is focusing on the TECHNICAL point of view, NOT the physical. Thank you for the email. I just have one question, is the updated solution totally free of plagiarism? Thanks

5. Clarity, writing mechanics, and formatting requirements Weight: 10% More than 8 errors present 7-8 errors present 5-6 errors present 3-4 errors present 0-2 errors present

4. 4 references Weight: 5% No references provided Does not meet the required number of references; all references poor quality choices. Rarely cited in the paper Does not meet the required number of references; some references poor quality choices. Some citations in the paper Meets number of required references; all references high quality choices. Several citations within the document. Exceeds number of required references; all references high quality choices. All references used and many citations within the document

2c. Provide a detailed Security plan for the CI Sector, from Technical security perspective Weight: 20% Did not submit or incompletelyprovided a detailed security plan from a Technical Security perspective. Insufficiently provided a detailed security plan from a Technical Security perspective. Partially provided a detailed security plan from a Technical Security perspective. Satisfactorily provided a security plan from a Technical Security perspective. Thoroughly provided a detailed security plan from a Technical Security perspective.

Hi there, please find attached as the assignment question with all the requirements criteria. Our group has chosen the sector "Nuclear Reactors, Materials, and Waste" for this paper. Please click on the url link for the sector's overview and other resources. My part is 2c) Provide a detailed Security plan for the CI Sector, from TECHNICAL SECURITY perspective. Please write 1.5 pages: - in font 12 (not font 13), -1.5 line spacing (not double space).Thank you.