Please use the following hypothetical scenario

Assignment Help Business Law and Ethics
Reference no: EM13902046

Please use the following hypothetical scenario to answer the following 5 questions.

Scenario

Janet Johnson, an African American woman, has been working at the Tennessee Hydroelectric plant for 15 years. During that time, his performance reviews have been exemplary. She decided to apply for the new plant foreman position. Although she felt that she was eminently qualified for the position, she also was growing tired of a certain good old boy culture at the plant. For years, the plant has had a culture of highly lewd "jokes," and many of the employees had also engaged in inappropriate touching of female employees. The plant had an anti-harassment policy on record, but Janet's boss shrugged and said "boys will be boys" when she reported the harassment to him.

Competition for the position was fierce. But ultimately, Jose Martinez, a Chilean man, received the position. Jose had 7 years of experience. Unbeknownst to the applicants the promotion board secretly ran a credit check on the applicants. Janet credit score came in as lower as average, and this factored into the board's decision. Although he met the qualifications of the position, one of the hiring managers told Janet in confidence that Janet was the most qualified person for the job. And the other managers had applied a racial preference on Jose's behalf due to there never having been a Latino manager at the plant even though Latino's represented 35% of employees at the plant.  Janet sues the plant for disparate treatment, disparate impact, and sexual harassment under Title VII.

Questions

  1. List the elements of disparate treatment and apply them to this case.  Can Janet prove a prima facie case? How would the plant rebuff these charges? Who would ultimately prevail? 
  2. List the elements of a disparate impact case and apply them to this case? Will Janet prevail on this charge?  
  3. List the elements of the sexual harassment case and apply them to this case? Can the plant establish an affirmative defense? 
  4. If the plant argues that it applied a racial preference to Jose to correct a manifest imbalance at the plant of underutilization of certain minorities, will the plant prevail? Why or why not?
  5. Was it legal to use the credit check as a factor in the promotion decision the way that it was done here? Why or why not?

Reference no: EM13902046

Have the campaign treasurers violated

Has Wentworth violated § 1001? Have the campaign treasurers violated § 1001? What mental state does 18 U.S.C. § 2 require? How does § 2 interface with § 1001?

Right off the coast of neighboring new hampshire

Right off the coast of neighboring New Hampshire is the very little known fishing area called St. Olaf's Hole, 185-215 miles off the coast.  It has some of the best commercial

Explain the corresponding theories of liability

Name the causes of action, and using the facts provided in the scenario, explain the corresponding theories of liability that could support a lawsuit under these circumstanc

Construct a substantive response using minimum of two source

Discuss two major differences between a traditional hazard such as the 2007 California Wildfires and the terrorist-related hazards associated with the Aum Shinrikyo Sarin Ga

Discuss the scenario and apply core concepts

Keep in mind that with decision making, employee motivation, and group behavior, so find a scenario that is most applicable in those regards. Discuss the scenario and apply

What is true about a negligence lawsuit

Natalia has sued a media agency for publishing false statements about her in one of its widely circulated newspapers. Natalia has sought damages from the media agency for vi

Analyze an ethical issue that a business has faced

You will identify and analyze an ethical issue that a business, corporation or profession has faced, or is currently confronting. You must first submit the proposed issue yo

Explain active disease and non-active disease

Distinguish the notion of "active disease" and "non-active disease" as the law defines these terms. What are two philosophical arguments of your own to support the position

Reviews

Write a Review

 
Free Assignment Quote

Assured A++ Grade

Get guaranteed satisfaction & time on delivery in every assignment order you paid with us! We ensure premium quality solution document along with free turntin report!

All rights reserved! Copyrights ©2019-2020 ExpertsMind IT Educational Pvt Ltd