+1-415-670-9189
info@expertsmind.com
How your resolution would affect the marketing options
Course:- Business Law and Ethics
Length: 932 Words
Reference No.:- EM13815343




Assignment Help
Expertsmind Rated 4.9 / 5 based on 47215 reviews.
Review Site
Assignment Help >> Business Law and Ethics

Assignment: Resolving Intellectual Property Rights

In this assignment, you will act as the fictional character of Betty Fuller, Head of Marketing at Simply Green Products, while you draft a memorandum to the company President. In this memorandum, you must explain how you would resolve the legal issues discussed in the scenario.

Scenario

Simply Green Products (SGP) is a $10 million company that produces biodegradable packing materials that orchards use in the Shenandoah Valley to transport their apples, peaches, and pears nationwide. Biodegradable materials are more eco-friendly because they break down into the environment. Such packing materials are marketed under the name "SafePac," which is heavily advertised in trade journals. Simply Green Products have had the name "SafePac" imprinted on all of their packing material since 2008. Although SGP never filed for either state or federal trademark protection, following the advice of one of their summer interns, they did register the domain name "SafePac.com." With the movement toward more eco-friendly agricultural production, the fact that such packing materials are biodegradable provides a primary marketing advantage over non-biodegradable competitors.

Despite the fact that SGP is highly eco-friendly, it is not particularly technologically advanced. SGP mostly advertises in trade journals and magazines, with most orders coming via the mail or phone orders. Shep Howard, President of SGP realizes his company needs to increase its marketing presence and recently hired Betty Fuller, a recent Strayer graduate with an MBA, to be the new Director of Marketing for the company. Ms. Fuller has been charged with bringing SGP's marketing plan into the 21st century.

In preparing the new Marketing plan, Ms. Fuller, quickly noticed that although SGP owned Safepac.com, the name SafePac, itself had never been registered with the Trademark and Patent Office. Accordingly, one of the first things Ms. Fuller did was start the registration process. When searching the USPTO office database to see if a mark has already been filed she found the following entries shown below:

Trademarks

She immediately realized SGP had a problem. Ms. Fuller did some additional research and found that a company called Safe Choices, Inc. uses the SafePack name to market an emergency weather kit in the form of a backpack; and had received a federal registration for the mark from the Patent and Trademark Office in 2002. This backpack is sold both online at SafePack.com and in sporting goods stores nationwide.

Legal Issues

Ms. Fuller contacted Shep Howard to discuss SGP intellectual property problems and to devise a plan on how to proceed. In her meeting with Howard Ms. Fuller explained the legal issues to Howard as follows:

SGP has been using the product name SafePac since 2008 but never trademarked or otherwise registered that named. A company called Safe Choice had registered the names SafePack and SafePacs back in 2002 and those names were listed live marks by the USPTO. Arguably, SafePac may be confusingly similar to Safe Choices marks to preclude registration of the marks. Moreover, use of the name may "constitutes a false designation of origin which is likely to confuse customers as to the source of the goods". However, safe Choice and SGP are in different product lines and, therefore, arguably are not competitors, a requirement for infringement. The intellectual property issue at hand involves the Lanham Act.

Even if the USPTO finds that SGP's proposed mark and Safe Choices marks are not similar or that SGP and Safe Choice are not competitors, registrations may nonetheless be denied under the provisions of the Trademark Dilution Revision Act of 2006, 15 U.S.C. § 1125(c). For additional information, see Duvall, S.A. (2007). The Trademark Dilution Revision Act of 2006: balanced protection for famous brands. The Trademark Reporter, 97(6), 1252-1285.

Since we purchased the domain name SafePac.com, Safe Choice may attempt to accuse SGP of cybersquatting and try to have that domain name transferred to their control. Any such action would proceed under the Anticybersquatting Consumer Protection Act (ACPA), 15 U.S.C. § 1125(d).

Finally, she outlined her plan on how to proceed with the marketing plan based on how she though the legal issues would be resolved. Mr. Howard then asked Ms. Fuller to put the information she had just given him in memo form.

Assignment Requirements

In the role of Betty Fuller, prepare the memorandum requested by Shep Howard. The memo should be three to four (3-4) pages in which you:

Decide whether or not SGP can register SafePac as a trademark given the issues discussed in "legal issue: a".

Decide whether or not the Trademark Dilution Revision Act of 2006 would be violated if the USTPO granted SGP a trademark on SafePac.

Decide whether or not the Anticybersquatting Consumer Protection Act would be violated by SGP's use of safepac.com.

Describe how your resolution would affect the marketing options available to the company.

Use at least three (3) quality academic or legal resources in this assignment, such as a government Website, Law school Websites, Restatements of laws, and other treatises of Law.  Your paper must include internal citations indicating the sources of your legal statements.

Answered:-

Verified Expert


Preview Container content

Introduction:

I am Betty Fuller, Head of Marketing Department at Simply Green Products. I am making this memorandum for president of Simply Green Products to describe them how we can resolve various issues that we have observed in this given scenario.

Simple Green Products produces biodegradable packing materials and these materials are used in Shenandoah Valley to transport their apples, peaches and peers nationwide. The packing material is marketed under the name SafePac since 2008. First of all we will listed here the main issues that we have observed in this given scenario.




Put your comment
 
Minimize


Ask Question & Get Answers from Experts
Browse some more (Business Law and Ethics) Materials
Use your selected country (Jamaica) and define the level of transnational organized crime in which they participate or to which they are subject. What is the predominant for
What is the nature of an administrative agency? Discuss why administrative agencies are important. List the unique qualities of administrative agencies. Describe the open
Advise John on the approaches that a principal could adopt to limit an agent's authority. Discuss which is the most pragmatic approach for John and explain it to John.
Compare and contrast the Issue, Rule, Application, and Conclusion (IRAC) method to the synthesis of cases and authorities' method. Explain the value of each legal writing str
Can she claim that a denial of a promotion is religious discrimination? The Sheriff wants to know what she should do (and why), based on your research and recommendations
In reviewing "Community Involvement: The Ultimate Force Multiplier," thoroughly discuss and explain three areas where community involvement has been identified as the key to
Discuss how the legal issues affect business. For example, could the problems have been avoided? Explain. Discuss realistic solutions supported by sound legal and business p
Based on this conclusion and discussing the source and derivation of income principles, state which amounts would be included in his assessable income for the year. You do n