How would you rank these in relative importance

Assignment Help Other Subject
Reference no: EM131111909

"The Workforce" Please respond to the following:

· Review "The Star Award". Select three candidates (from the field of five) to receive bonuses. Justify your response with one or two reasons.

THE STAR AWARD

As director of the excise audit bureau in the West Dakota Department of Taxation, you have to decide who on your staff should receive a new performance bonus. The legislature created the bonus back in February, and the division of personnel has now issued all the regulations. You have the forms and instructions, and by the end of the month, you have to send your choices to the taxation commissioner, who will forward them to personnel.

Two things motivated the West Dakota legislature to create the performance bonus. First, key legislators had concluded that state employees were simply not working hard enough. Legislators constantly receive complaints about the lackadaisical attitude of state workers, and they concluded that the fixed civil service pay scale was not attracting new talent or motivating existing employees.

Second, West Dakota is running a budget surplus for the second straight year. Naturally, the legislature has cut taxes-twice. But despite those efforts, the budget continues to show a surplus. Consequently, the Speaker of the House decided to use a portion of it to reward the "stars" of state government.

The new Star Award will give the top20 percent of employees in each unit a $5000 bonus, to be paid in 1 2 monthly installments during the coming fiscal year. The bonus is supposed to go to those employees who are not only "outstanding" but also genuine stars. The head of each unit must determine the criteria for choosing who the stars are. To ensure that the bonus can be included in the July payroll checks, each manager must submit a "star list" by June 20.

Your audit bureau has 1 5 employees with a wide range of responsibilities and job classifications-everything from clerk I to senior auditor. And, predictably, they also possess a range of talent, enthusiasm, and effectiveness.

Here are the most obvious candidates for the performance bonus:

• Larry Beck, senior auditor. As a 23-year employee, Beck is clearly your most knowledgeable and effective auditor. Everyone goes to him for advice. Everyone looks up to him. But in two years, Larry will be eligible to receive his pension, and he knows it. He can still be a top performer-when he wants to. Recently, however, he has lost a little drive, although most people in the Department of Taxation still think of him as your unit's star.

• Jim Beatty, auditor III. With an advanced degree in accounting, Jim draws your unit's tough assignments. He understands the subtleties of the excise tax and thus works with both the department's legal counsel and the attorney general's office explaining the intricacies of each case and helping to formulate strategy. He can, however, be condescending toward his less knowledgeable colleagues, few of whom understand the complexity of his work.

• Rachel Gonzalez, auditor I. Straight out of law school with a verve for public service, Rachel is a real go-getter. In fact, she has struck gold several times, having gone over the books of numerous firms in such detail that she found mistakes most other auditors would have missed. Unfortunately, she also discovered some "errors" at a firm owned by the House Speaker's cousin. The firm refused to acknowledge any error, and eventually the department's legal counsel decided to settle out of court. The firm paid the taxes that Rachel claimed it owed (plus interest) but admitted no guilt for any tax violations and paid no fine. Rachel would be a gutsy choice on your part, but it might create a few problems politically when the Speaker hears about it.

• Martha Rutledge, administrative assistant II.

With 35 years in the Department of Taxation, Martha knows everybody and everything. She runs your life. In fact, she really runs the day-to-day business of the audit unit, permitting you to concentrate on long-term, strategic concerns. You trust both her skills and her judgment; she really functions as your deputy director. Of course, she is still paid as an administrative assistant. It's hard to imagine Martha slacking off in her duties under any circumstances; it's also unlikely that an award would make her any more diligent. She'll be doing her same conscientious job right up until the day she leaves.

• Samantha Black, clerk I.

Two years ago, straight out of high school, Samantha passed the civil service exam with flying colors. You immediately hired her, and she quickly became a real team member-both competent and cheery. Every auditor wants to give his or her clerical work to Samantha. Moreover, others in the department have heard of her talents, and she has already turned down several offers as a clerk II. You, however, don't have a clerk II position into which you can promote her.

The rest of your employees are quite proficient and professional. They're smart; to do their work, they have to be. Like any other manager in the taxation department, or in state government for that matter, you have a couple of people whom you wouldn't mind replacing. Still, you have a talented team that does its job without requiring much attention (except when you step on some politically sensitive toes). Your people are overworked and underappreciated. If the bonus is for performance, 90 percent of them deserve one.

But you have only three to give.

Case Questions

1 . Before turning to specifics of the case, consider the following more general question. Most would agree the six factors in the following list are important in determining whom to hire and promote:

• Capacity
• Experience
• Integrity
• Knowledge
• Motivation
• Understanding

How would you rank these in relative importance?

Support your answer.

2. Who in this case would you pick?

Reference no: EM131111909

Write a summary outlining the eating disorder

Now as an adult with a family, he has been unable to keep a job for more than a few months. His wife keeps the finances as she knows that he is irresponsible with money. Wri

Review the academic literature and discuss the arguments

LAW 1600 Legal Writing & Research - Please review the academic literature and discuss the arguments which have been presented calling for amendment or repeal of section 18C,

Genetic disorder-aberrant gene splicing

Explain a genetic disorder which results from aberrant gene splicing. How does alternative splicing influence the disorder? Where in the gene does the aberrant splicing take

Explain three negative effects on the doctor-patient

Explain what euthanasia cases may be permissible according to Velleman. Be sure to include the concept of pain and the concept of suffering. Explain three negative effects on

Does he really deserve prison

A man aged 40 had sex with a 13 year old girl. it was not rape it was sex. it happen decades ago. he plead guilty and fled. Is this a crime or just an issue of morals? Does he

Residents registered as republicans and that republicans

A friend of yours tells you that the district in which she lives has 85% of its residents registered as Republicans and that Republicans always win the House election from her

Example of a person with dissociative fugue state

The case of Cheryl Ann Barnes is one example of a person with Dissociative Fugue State. Research and submit another case of Dissociative Fugue State.Make sure you cite your so

Explain how can culture be transmitted to employees

How can culture be transmitted to employees? Discuss and provide examples for each. Considering an organization you know well, have any of these examples surfaced as more im

Reviews

Write a Review

 
Free Assignment Quote

Assured A++ Grade

Get guaranteed satisfaction & time on delivery in every assignment order you paid with us! We ensure premium quality solution document along with free turntin report!

All rights reserved! Copyrights ©2019-2020 ExpertsMind IT Educational Pvt Ltd