Reference no: EM13932660
-For this discussion question please respond in third person, 150 words, APA style writing, 12 font.
"For which of you, intending to build a tower, does not sit down first and count the cost, whether he has enough to finish it - lest, after he has laid the foundation, and is not able to finish, all who see it begin to mock him, saying, ‘This man began to build and was not able to finish'?" Luke 14:28-30 (NKJV)
A doctoral dissertation is like a story, with a beginning, middle, and a conclusion. These elements are tied together, with each one leading logically into the next. In the same way, a dissertation has a beginning, middle, and a conclusion that are tied together logically. How will you determine if the conclusions of your research are logically supported or not? Do conclusions that are not logically supported invalidate the entire study? Why or why not?
-This is a response that must be replied back to in third person 150 words, APA style word count.
Saade et al. (2012) describe critical thinking as the mental processes of discernment, analysis, and evaluation applied to information in order to achieve a logical final understanding and /or judgment. Describe your approach to breaking down information into component parts to better understand the characteristic of a statement, concept or problem. How might outlining help to develop understanding? How do you know when to reach beyond previous experience and seek out other sources of information to enhance your understanding of the work in front of you?
According to the lecture reading the learner should recognize their subject position in order to critically evaluate data which a logical assuming can be proceeded. The learner will have informative and effective knowledge when thinking critical. The learner must become savvy with technology information and developed sensitive early in the doctoral process. The learner will strategic implemented new technology into their traditional note-taking while research many broader topics that are related to the main subject. The learner will developed a skill of research, reading, analysis and evaluated information , in doing so this will enable the learner to have a enlarge and enriching concept of critical thinking. Another method of critical thinking is ground theory in the early stage of this processing information , the learner will implied a method of ground theory or discovering theory from the ground up. The learner is emerging into an understanding that is many topics to familiarize some key points which will help will discern, analysis some topics. The learner in doctoral program will be able to identify, interpret, framework of material. Their will have a informed commentary of knowledge basic on the resources.
According to Saade et al. (2012) critical thinking is vivid in the early process, it is a body of knowledge which the learner will enhance the learner experience. When a learner is in the process of critical thinking the idea are limited but there are many possibilities. The process in critical is limited , obsolesce, and false but once the thinking process started the learner will explored his or her option with the vary sources of information .
The process of an outline when researching has many benefits .The outline is simiarility to a checklist once the learner has document key point or information that is relevance to writing. An outline is merely resources of information for the learner to follow the guideline. What makes for a challenging outline is when the learner hasn't done the beginning stage of brainstorm. The brainstorm is a method the learner should come familiar with because is a guideline in writing, review the rubric is similarly to a checklist what is accepted in writing for an assignment. The outline when presence will assist the learner to stay focus on the main idea and not be derailing. An outline is to verify information and it will reduce the process of wasting time.
Saade, R. G., Morin, D., & Thomas, J. D. E. (2012). Critical thinking in e-learning environments. Computers in Human Behavior, 28(5), 1608-1617.
Find Your Purpose: The Path to a Successful Doctoral Experience