Reference no: EM13852497
Suppose that during regular work hours, an employee of XYZ Co. commits a sexual assault or other violent attack upon a member of the public. The employee, of course, is liable for the intentional tort of battery (about which you learned in Chapter 6), as well as a criminal offense. Although the doctrine of respondeat superior makes employers liable for their employees' torts when those torts are committed within the scope of employment, XYZ is quite unlikely to face respondeat superior liability for its employee's flagrantly wrongful act because a sexual assault or violent attack, even if committed during regular work hours, presumably would be outside the scope of employment.
However, as the principles explained in this chapter suggest, XYZ could be liable for its own tort if XYZ was negligent in hiring, supervising, or retaining the employee who committed the attack. A determination of whether XYZ was negligent would depend upon all of the relevant facts and circumstances.
Regardless of whether XYZ would or would not face legal liability, the scenario described above suggests related ethical questions that may confront employers. Consider the following:
• Does an employer have an ethical obligation to take corrective or preventive action when the employer knows, or has reason to know, that the employee poses a danger to others?
• Does it matter whether the employer has irrefutable evidence that the employee poses a danger, or whether the employer has only a reasonable suspicion to that effect?
• If the employer has an ethical obligation to take corrective or preventive action, to whom does that obligation run and what should that obligation entail?
• Does the employer owe any ethical duty to the employee in such situations?
Uniform standard will not meet cost-effectiveness criterion
: Assume that two power plants, Firm 1 and Firm 2, release arsenic in a small urban community that exceeds the emissions standard. To meet the standard, 40 units of SO2 must be abated in total. Prove that a uniform standard will not meet the cost-effec..
|
What legal theory would mickey assert here to win his case
: Mickey Mouse entered into a written contract for the purchase of 200 pairs of gloves at at cost of $200 ($1 each x 200 pair). What legal theory would Mickey assert here to win his case
|
Velocity remains constant-money supply increases
: Velocity remains constant at 8 and the money supply increases from $200 billion to $300 billion. The? original, nominal GDP was $ __ trillion? The ?new, nominal GDP is $ __ trillion?
|
How much money should be deposited
: How much money should be deposited each year for 12 years if you wish to withdraw 294$ each year for 5 years, beginning at the end of the 14th year? Let i = 10% per year.
|
Does an employer have an ethical obligation
: Does an employer have an ethical obligation to take corrective or preventive action when the employer knows, or has reason to know, that the employee poses a danger to others
|
The growth rate of the money supply
: If the growth rate of the money supply is 6?%, velocity is? constant, and real GDP grows at 4?% per year on? average, then the inflation rate will be what %? If the growth rate of the money supply increases to 18?%, velocity is? constant, and real GD..
|
Use the market relates to vertically integrate
: Use the market relates to vertically integrate as:
|
Light bulb efficiency and energy consumption
: LED light bulbs use only 20 to 25 percent of the energy used by traditional incandescent bulbs. Even if all consumers replace their old bulbs by the LED bulbs, do we expect that the arrival of LED light bulbs will decrease energy consumption for ligh..
|
What was the amount he withdrew at end of the eighth year
: Mr. Smith has saved $1,800 each year for 20 years. A year after the saving period ended, Mr. Smith withdrew $7,500 each year for a period of 5 years. In the sixth and seventh years, he only withdrew $5,000 per year. In the eighth year, he decided to ..
|