Implementation – relevant issues considered 3 • Very poor level of detail and use of implementation tools. • Adequate level of detail and use of implementation tools. • Good level of detail and use of implementation tools. • Very good level of detail and use of implementation tools. • Excellent level of detail and use of implementation tools. Action Plan – consistent, rational and succinct 3 • Action plan does not identify the major steps that should be follows to implement the change. • Action plan does not include a timeline to indicate the timing of the major steps for implementation. • Action plan is not consistent in the nature and level of detail. • Action plan has tool much detail and is confusing. • Action plan is good, being clear and concise. • Action plan is excellent, being clear, concise and well thought out..

Solution generation – creativity and scope 4 • Idea generation has been poorly thought out and has very little evidence of creativity or a new way of solving the problem. • Idea generation has only addressed a limited part of the problem, but it has not addressed the scope of the problem. • Idea generation displays some divergent thinking but would benefit from more detail. • Interesting idea generation with good use of tools. • Very interesting idea generation with very good use of tools. • Excellent idea generation with excellent use of tools. Solution evaluation – logical and practical 4 • Solution evaluation is poorly formulated, lacks detail and/or does not use any of the available tools. • Solution evaluation has not used logical approaches to appraise the ideas and choose the “best” for implementation. • Solution evaluation has not considered practical issues to appraise the ideas and choose the “best” for implementation. • Good solution evaluation with good use of appropriate tools. • Very good solution evaluation with very good use of appropriate tools. • Excellent solution evaluation with excellent use of appropriate tools.

Professional presentation including references 1 • Presentation is of a very poor standard, with many spelling and grammatical mistakes, and an inadequate/or missing reference list. • Presentation is adequate, but referencing is poor/missing. • Presentation is adequate with occasional spelling/grammatical mistakes. • Good presentation and referencing. • Very good presentation and referencing. • Excellent presentation and referencing. Specific criteria 18 Problem identification – validity and clarity 4 • Very poor identification of the problem, with little or no use of appropriate tools and techniques. • Poor identification of the problem, with inconsistent use of appropriate tools and techniques. • Adequate identification of the problem and use of appropriate tools and techniques. • Good identification of the problem and use of appropriate tools and techniques. • Very good identification of the problem and use of appropriate tools and techniques. • Excellent identification of the problem and use of appropriate tools and techniques.

• Description of solution and justification lacks the detail and substance to make a convincing argument that it would help solve the problem. • Description of is adequate, but have failed to justify your choice based. • Description of solution and justification is adequate, but could benefit from more detail on the features of the problem. • Good description of solution and justification of choice, with good level of detail. • Very good description of solution and justification of choice, with very good level of detail. • Excellent description of solution and justification of choice, with excellent level of detail. Application of appropriate tools and techniques 4 • The choice and application of tools and techniques is poorly and inappropriately applied at the different stages of the problem solving process. • The choice and application of tools and techniques has not been consistently applied to the appropriate stages of the problem solving process. • The application of tools and techniques is adequate, but could benefit from more detail when applying the tools.

Question :need assignment on the topic attached with question and marking guide . already one has been done wrong by your team so make sure its correct Structure – appropriate, professional and accessible 1 • Very poorly structured and confusing to read. • Structure is adequate, but you could use more subheadings to improve clarity. • Very well structured with the clarity required of a professional report Process – reasoned, coherent and consistent 4 • It is not at all clear what process you are following for problem solving. • Description of problem solving process and rationale is adequate, but could benefit from more information and/or consistency in application. • Description of problem solving process is adequate, but you have failed to justify your choice based on the nature of the problem • Good description of problem solving process and rationale, with good level of detail. • Very good description of problem solving process and rationale, with very good level of detail. • Excellent description of problem solving process and rationale, with excellent level of detail.