It is an excellent assignment. Thank you heaps for the quick turnover time, I am very pleased with the result you have given me and have no issues with it. Again thank you, this is a high quality result and I appreciate that.

Please acknowledge with the 1st part "Self-analysis/-reflection". Here, it is mentioned that " Students are to contrast the results of the diagnostics tests and reflect on their own practice by identifying two incidences from their recent past (i.e. last 12 months) in which the chosen capabilities were being used. Students are then to analyze the incidents to determine whether the results of the self-diagnosis are evidenced in practice". My question is: from where the students will get their past incidences? Secondly, do i need to give questionnaire for each of the tools? Please provide me with an example of the type of questions required. I do not have any problem with literature review and conclusion. I send you my friend's assignment for self analysis and questionnaires from - Quinn Management Questionnaire, the ESCI (Emotional Intelligence).. you can also use more questionnaires from this Quinn Management Questionnaire, the ESCI (Emotional Intelligence) . Please do not copy from this because of plagiarism problem.

Hello, Many students gave you to make same assignment from Central Queensland University university.so please careful with plagiarism.

Your report will not exceed 3000 words (excluding appendices) and must use the format shown below. The breakdown of marks for each task is shown in brackets: • A brief background to the organization and its environment (10 marks) • An Introduction to the focus of the report (the practice, issue, event or sub-unit) (NOTE: WITHIN THIS SECTION YOU MUST INCLUDE A SENTENCE STATING YOUR FOCUS CLEARLY AND SIMPLY) (10 marks) • A brief argument which explains/justifies why you have chosen a particular theoretical framework instead of 1 other alternative that you considered but have rejected (10 marks) • An explanation of your chosen theoretical framework that you will use to analyse the organization, including its main concepts (20 marks) • An analysis of the practice, issue, event or sub-unit which uses the chosen theoretical framework and concepts (30 marks) • Conclusions (including recommendations if necessary) (10 marks)

Title: An analysis of the culture of an organisation Your report will apply ONE theoretical framework used in-the study of organizational culture to conduct an analysis of an organization's culture. The analysis will illustrate the culture by focusing on EITHER 1. An issue (something which the organization has responded to) OR 2. A particular organizational practice (something the organization does) OR 3. An event (some particular incident or series of incidents inside the organization) OR 4. A sub — unit (an organizational department department/division) .

Quality Framework (AQF) guidelines. Two specific requirements need to be considered. Students need to demonstrate “a body of knowledge that includes the understanding of recent developments in a discipline and/or area of professional practice", and demonstrate "knowledge of research principles and methods applicable to a field of work and/or learning”. Each unit in the MBA has a number of required weekly readings in terms of academic texts, journals and business publications that represent the appropriate body of knowledge and recent developments referred to by the AQF. In order to demonstrate the ability to engage in appropriate research, students should read and utilise these texts and journals and publications, and as Masters students, indicate a willingness to research beyond this minimum standard through additional texts, journals and studies that demonstrate an ability to engage in independent research. Students should ensure that they understand the specific research that is required for each assessment piece and recognise that if they meet this minimum requirement, they will receive the minimum grade for demonstrated research.

Assessment Criteria 1. Provide the results of minimum of 3 diagnostic tools that relate to the selected leadership competency and to analyze (reflect) these against the past practice to identify personal strengths and weaknesses. 2. Ability to construct a detailed and cohesive literature review that defines key concepts and terms related to the selected leadership competency/capability. 3. As part of the literature review to summaries and contrast key concepts/models related to the selected competency/capability. 4. Ability to devise a personal (management) development plan, supported by literature, that addresses these key capability needs. 5. Demonstrate a breadth and quality of research by using a minimum of 12 academic sources from recommended texts and journal articles. 6. Correct use of the APA in-text referencing system to correctly cite academic sources