Determine the price you are willing to pay

Assignment Help Case Study
Reference no: EM131003899 , Length:

QUESTION

From a prospective investor's (or buyer's) point of view, determine the price you are willing to pay, if you are to invest.

-          Write a brief paper (two pages maximum) supporting your rationale for the valuation you have chosen, and provide appropriate financial appendices (in addition to the two pages of text) showing your analyses.

CASE

Abstract

After the excitement of spinning their business out of Initier Partners SA ('IPS'), Adrien Dubois and Pierre Martin were now facing the realities of the venture capital funding market. Launching a start up in the semiconductor field was always going to be a challenge. They were on track with their product development but the summer of 1998 had flown by and they now had only three months to raise the €6m they needed to take the product 'into silicon'.

Plenty of investors had wanted to see the plan and what was by September 1998 a very refined sales pitch! Dubois and Martin had been disappointed that only four had made the effort to visit but they were now confident they would get offers from at least two. Frustratingly, neither of the investors had been specific on valuations and the team had no idea if the offers would meet either their or their other shareholder's expectations.

Background

Ntellu was established in France in 1998 by two management consultants: Adrien Dubois, a 40-year-old with a background in sales and marketing, and Pierre Martin, a 38-year-old technology engineer with an impressive reputation in the chip design field. They had worked together for a number of years at IPS, a technology consulting firm based in the Nice high tech R&D cluster.

Martin was the driving force behind Ntellu. He was an internationally recognised expert in the field of wireless chip design and had progressed quickly through IPS' ranks to become head of technology solution design. By the end of the 1990s he was tired of the long hours demanded by a consulting career and felt he wasn't reaping the rewards of the many successful solutions he and his team developed for IPS' clients.

He had been working on a number of applications in the communications infrastructure field. It was an exploding sector with the Internet driving rapid growth in demand for communications systems and the market for network-enabled devices. New standards were evolving in this fast-paced world and with ever-shortening product cycles increasing the pressure towards commoditisation, opportunities were emerging for new players to compete. The race was now on to develop technologies to support wireless data and voice communication that could operate across disparate devices at the network edge.

Martin's recent focus had been the development of a new wireless embedded chip product that he believed provided the simple, low cost cross-platform solution the market was looking for. This chip enabled devices to communicate directly with each other as part of a Personal Area Network. In the past two decades, electronic devices such as mobile phones, PDAs and digital cameras were progressively becoming interconnected through wide-area networks (WAN) such as the Internet, as well as local-area networks (LAN) such as Ethernet. These devices also needed to communicate directly with each other. Peripherals and accessories (such as keyboards, printers, headsets) could at present only function with a direct 'wired' connection to data processing devices (such as PCs, PDAs). Martin's technology provided a 'wireless' communication solution for these and other data processing devices that required interconnections to exchange files or synchronise data with each other.

Martin felt that the time was right to step away from providing solutions in a consulting capacity and start a stand-alone business. He persuaded his good friend and colleague, Adrien Dubois, to join him and in February 1998 they approached IPS and proposed a 'spin out'. IPS had a history of supporting spin out businesses and after surprisingly smooth discussions, agreed to licence the intellectual property rights the team needed and invest €350,000 to seed the business. In April 1998 Ntellu was formed.

The seed capital funded initial development and the team were on track to take the product into silicon by Q2 1999. Martin reckoned they needed at least €6m to complete the development and testing. The company would then require a further €29m to move to volume production. Their aim was to raise the first round of €6m by the end of 1998, raise the further €29m in a second round in 2000 and then take the business to IPO in 2003. It was an ambitious strategy.

The Plan

The plan was to develop a product offering based on a combination of wireless chips, communications protocols and software applications. Target end-customers included companies such as Ericsson, Motorola, Nokia, Apple, Dell and Microsoft who assembled wireless chips directly onto end product motherboards. Even dishwasher manufacturers were building partnerships with technology suppliers to network their appliances into wireless home networks and the Internet in order to allow them to introduce new pricing models based on usage.

A number of competing wireless communications standards were emerging at this time such as Zigbee, Bluetooth, UWB, CDMA and WiFi. It was not clear at this stage which standard was going to take precedence but the trend towards mobile connectivity was clearly an accelerating market force, and the upside for developing products based on the right standard would be substantial.

Ntellu's approach was to adopt a fabless1 business model under which the manufacturing of its chips and their assembly, packaging, testing and shipping would be sub-contracted to third parties. Ntellu would then focus its efforts on the design, development, sales, marketing and support of its products. It would principally sell its products through stocking distributors who would purchase directly from Ntellu and hence take on the inventory risk.

Timing would be key; failure to develop and introduce the Ntellu chip in a timely manner would be management's biggest challenge. Long product design cycles and short product life cycles meant continual investment in R&D to develop new products would be critical to continue competing in these markets. There was also the inherent problem of protecting IP2 in this space with industrial espionage and the rapid emergence of 'copycat' products by low-cost Asian manufacturers another area of potential risk.

Adrien Dubois and Pierre Martin would jointly run the new company. Ntellu had a license in perpetuity from IPS for its propriety wireless chip software, and the top development engineers and technicians who had been working with Martin on development of this technology would become part of Ntellu's team.

The Market and Industry

Ntellu intended to capitalise on the trend for wireless mobile connectivity which was expected to ramp up in all areas of computing, networking and consumer electronics, as well as the growth in the number of digital devices commonly owned by consumers (from toasters to motor cars).

Key market drivers included:

-          Proliferation of personal electronic devices over the past decade - both on desktops and in pockets, creating market demand for generic inter-connectivity, supported by high bandwidth/baud rates;

-          Availability of unlicensed parts of the radio frequency spectrum in Europe and the US allowing potentially widespread take up of cheap wireless technology;

-          Increasingly urgent search for new USPs in maturing mass markets such as networked PCs and handheld communication devices;

-          Health scares associated with existing offerings, especially in the mobile device space.

The industry in which Ntellu was looking to operate was intensely competitive, characterised by rapid technological change, evolving industry standards and declining average selling prices. The company would be up against the giants in the industry including Intel, IBM and Hewlett-Packard. These and other competitors were established players with substantial resources, able to respond quickly to changing customer demands or devote greater resources to develop new products. But the high level of uncertainty surrounding the viability and/or adoption rate of this technology, as well as the availability of competing short-range wireless communications standards being developed, created the opportunity for new entrants such as Ntellu.

The semiconductor industry was growing at this time, but was highly cyclical. The industry had experienced significant downturns, often in connection with, or in anticipation of, maturing product cycles (of both semiconductor companies and their customers' products) and declines in general economic conditions. Any future downturns would significantly harm Ntellu's prospects.

Financial Model

Ntellu expected to earn revenue from the following sources:

-          Sales of its wireless chip products to stocking distributors who would then sell to OEM3s and ODM4s;

-          Direct sales of wireless chip products to OEMs and ODMs;

-          Sales of reference design kits, used by these customers to assist in the design-in phase;

-          Royalty revenues from license of its chip designs to OEMs.

Key components of costs would include:

-          Cost of sales: primarily purchased silicon wafers and associated costs of assembly, testing and shipping;

-          Research and development expenses: primarily personnel, contractor and related costs, development equipment and pre-production costs associated with early stage product development;

-          Sales, marketing and admin expenses: primarily personnel and related costs. Management believed that maintaining a widely available and high quality technical support group was key to expanding and maintaining its customer base.

Ntellu's ability to achieve sustainable profitability would depend on the rate of growth of its target markets, the commercial success of its wireless chip products (which would depend on the viability of the technology and rate of adoption of the technology by OEMs and ODMs), its ability to reduce production costs in line with average selling prices of its products, the competitive position of its products and its ability to develop new products.

Ntellu would incur substantial expenses before it earned associated turnover and it was assumed that all development costs would be expensed. Based on a detailed set of projections, the business plan's forecasts were as follows:

Ntellu financial projections

           
               

(m)

1999

2000

2001

2002

2003

2004

2005

Turnover

0.2

4

14

23

56

212

412

Cost of sales

-0.5

-2

-8

-13

-31

-113

-223

Operating costs

-1.7

-7

-15

-23

-28

-50

-102

Profit before int. & tax

-2

-5

-9

-13

-3

49

87

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Financing Issues

Currently, IPS owned 35 per cent of Ntellu and the two founders owned 65 per cent between them. IPS was not prepared (or able) to invest further in the business but expected to maintain a substantial stake in recognition of the IP transfer and seed funding. Both Dubois and Martin were willing to invest €50,000 each in the business, but wanted to continue drawing their salaries of €80,000 p.a.

The two entrepreneurs expected the initial round of €6m to be all equity finance. But they wondered what valuation the competing investors would place on their fledgling enterprise and hence what stake they would be able to retain in the company. They also wanted to understand what else the investors could bring to the opportunity and, importantly, what their position would be when Ntellu needed to raise the second round funding.

Dubois and Martin had found it difficult to find comparable investments in similar businesses that they could use as a guide to valuations, but they had collected some data that they thought would provide useful benchmarks:

Market Ratios in 1999

Comparable Public Company P/Es

CAC 40 average P/E

21.6

ST Microelectronics

70.4

FTSE 100 average P/E

28.9

Texas Instruments

62.6

FTSE Infotech h/ware average P/E

88.5

Micron

17.7

FTSE Fledgling average P/E

42.7

Mean

50.2

 

 

 

 

 

Tax and Lending Rates

Large Cap European Technology

Corporate tax rate (France)

35.33%

Alcatel

63.1

Base lending rate (Europe)

4.25%

 

 

 

Verified Expert

"The solution analyses various valuation techniques for the firm and how the firm shall be evaluated for the purpose of investment using the financial models and techniques"

Reference no: EM131003899

Questions Cloud

State the current unemployment rate and inflation rate : State the current unemployment rate and inflation rate in Ireland and discuss the problems the pose for the Irish government. Discuss using examples and class materials
Discuss what are the three key aspects of research : Discuss what are the three key aspects of research? Which one of them you consider the most important, or are they equally important?
Explain the relationship among the variables : Do the following based on your scenario, - List and label the variables as independent, dependent, intervening, or moderating,  Explain the relationship among the variables, - Develop a problem statement for the situation.
Dataline case study : James Dougan, chief executive of Dataline Oil Services (DOS), faced a tough decision. A bid, which he and his fellow managers had put together to buy DOS from its parent company, had just been topped unexpectedly by another company. He and his team n..
Determine the price you are willing to pay : Write a brief paper (two pages maximum) supporting your rationale for the valuation you have chosen, and provide appropriate financial appendices (in addition to the two pages of text) showing your analyses.
From a prospective investor point of view : From a prospective investor's (or buyer's) point of view, determine the price you are willing to pay, if you are to invest. Write a brief paper (two pages maximum) supporting your rationale for the valuation you have chosen, and provide appropriate f..
Compute the term structure of interest rates : Plot the term structure of interest rates - remember that the y(t, T) = -1/T-t log P(t, T). Describe the term structure and Compute the term structure of interest rates with the value of ro= 0.17. What is the difference between the two term structur..
What are the x-intercepts of the graph : What are the x-intercepts of the graph? At what values of x does the graph have a vertical asymptote? At what values of y does the graph have a horizontal asymptote?
Autumn 1999 exam : A survey of a magazine's subscribers indicates that 60% own a home and 75% own a car. Ninety percent of the home owners who subscribe to the magazine, also own a car. What proportion of subscribers i. own both a car and a house? ii. own a car or a..

Reviews

Write a Review

Case Study Questions & Answers

  Secret banking elite rules trading in derivatives

Regulators should assert influence over the derivatives market, like they do with stocks, and require derivatives to be traded on an open exchange where buyers and sellers disclose prices and fees.

  Prepare a journal which records your activities and

demonstrate effective communication by composing writing that communicates ideas meaning andor argument in a format

  Discuss the sensitivity ranges of the decision variables

How much of each blend should the East Anglia Tea Company make each week to maximize its profit? Create a linear programming model, and solve it using the Solver utility of Excel.

  Discuss the origin and what is pad and euthanasia

Background: Discuss the origin, what is PAD, euthanasia (along with withholding treatment, pain meds to hasten death, and palliative sedation)

  Six sigma green belt professional dear clientplease find

dear client ltbrgt ltbrgtplease find the attachment file. kindly send me solution asap. ltbrgt ltbrgtthanks amp best

  Identify the relevant facts of the case study

Imagine you are the financial controller of XYZ Ltd a corporation that is a very large donor to HOHO. You have recently become aware that its TV advertising has resulted in the charity violating the 25% expenditure ratio for its charity drive.    Id..

  Aims and backgroundthis project aims to give students

aims and backgroundthis project aims to give students hands-on experience in designing and implementing a web

  Case study on inventory and supply chain management

Normal 0 false false false EN-US X-NONE X-NONE Inventory and supply chain management.

  What is continuous improvement

What is Continuous Improvement? Who would be involved in this process and what would they be doing to enable improvements - Describe the type of culture Corus is developing. How will the vision plan help to develop this culture?

  What was the innovative supply chain strategy

What was Essilors mission and what was the innovative supply chain strategy used to support the mission and how did Essilor use the combination of innovation and customer service to become one of the world's 30 most innovative companies by Forbes?

  Prepare a stakeholder analysis for this project

Prepare a stakeholder analysis for this project, using the template provided in Appendices and example in core text as guides. Be creative in making up information about stakeholders, if it’s not provided.

  Is sport becoming too commercialised

Read and study the case thoroughly and efficiently. Read the case once for familiarity, noting issues that come to the forefront. Read it again

Free Assignment Quote

Assured A++ Grade

Get guaranteed satisfaction & time on delivery in every assignment order you paid with us! We ensure premium quality solution document along with free turntin report!

All rights reserved! Copyrights ©2019-2020 ExpertsMind IT Educational Pvt Ltd