"Evaluation of education systemthey are supposed to answer the question. Student email id’s are taken and a copy ofquestionnaire is sent to the interested students. Phone calls are frequently made to ensure thatthe response from the students is on time. The questionnaire is elaborated in appendix-A.3.3 Result analysisResearch Question 1: Is current Examination system of performance evaluation adequate?Research Question 2: What are student’s suggestions on new methods of evaluation system?Research Question 3: What are the general opinions of students on current teaching methodsadopted?How general education program can be improvised?Research Question 4: What are the opinions of students with respect to the integration oftechnology in education? Is it having any effect on their performance, engagement and learning?Research Question 5: Evaluation of modern communication methods for educative purposes?4. Ethical IssuesAny reform has to go through many hurdles to show its positive impact. Moreover the reformshould be considering the correct ethical and social practices defined in the code of ethics.The current research shall be beneficial for revolutionizing the existing examination procedures,teaching methodologies and overall educational system.There are a lot of irregularities that an institution of higher studies faces which in the long runeffect the trustworthinessof the evaluation process that is in place and thus impacting the overall 24 Evaluation of education systemresult. Among the irregularities issues that are plaguing an institution some of the most generalirregularities come from the people that are a part of the institution itself. They can the studentsthat are studying there; the faculties that are teaching there and even sometimes the non-teachingstaffs are also involved. These irregularities can range from cheating that is done by the studentsin the examination, the of mobile devices and the calculators that are advanced programmed,plagiarism, behaving poorly during the conduction of the evaluation, the leaking of theevaluation paper either by the faculty or the non-teaching staff and there are many other issues aswell. 25 Evaluation of education system5. ReferencesSatterly, D. (1981). Assessment in schools: Theory and practice in education. Oxford:BasilBlackwell.Webb, N., & Briars, D. (1990).Assessment in mathematics classrooms, K-8.In T. J.Cooney (ed.), Teaching and Learning Mathematics in the 1990s, 1990 Yearbook of the NationalCouncilof Teachers of Mathematics, (pp. 108-17). Reston, Va: NCTM.Rowntree, D. (1977). Assessing students: How shall we know them? London: Harper and Row.Cockcroft, W. H. (1982). Mathematics counts. London: HMSO.Apple Computer. (2005). Research: What It Says About 1 to 1 Learning. Retrieved fromhttp://www.ubiqcomputing.org/Apple_1-to-1_Research.pdf.The CEO Forum on Education and Technology. (2001). Education Technology Must Be IncludedinComprehensive Education Legislation. Policy Paper. Retrieved from:<http://www.ceoforum.org/downloads/forum3.pdf.>Culp, K.M., Honey, M., &Mandinach, E. (2003). A Retrospective on Twenty Years ofEducatioTechnology Policy.Office of Educational Technology, U.S. Department ofEducation.Retrieved from http://ed.gov/rschstat/eval/tech/20years.pdf.Education Week. (2008). Technology Counts 2008. Education Week, 27(30).Retrieved fromhttp://www.edweek.org/ew/toc/2008/03/27/index.html.Glennan, T.K., &Melmed, A. (1996).Fostering the Use of Educational Technology: Elements ofa National Strategy. Santa Monica, CA: RAND.The Greaves Group. (2006). America’s Digital Schools 2006: A Five-Year Forecast. Retrievedfrom http://www.ads2006.org/main/pdf/ADS2006KF.pdf.26 Evaluation of education systemMcCampbell, B. (2002). Technology Education vs. Education Technology: Do You Know theDifference? Principal Leadership, 2(9), 55-57.Honey, M., Culp, K.M., &Spielvogel, R. (2005). Using Technology to Improve StudentAchievement.North Central Regional Educational Laboratory CriticalIssue.Retrievedfromhttp://www.ncrel.org/sdrs/areas/issues/methods/technlgy/te800.htm.Jobe, H., & Peck, K.L. (2008).Classrooms for the Future (CFF): Preliminary Results.Presentation at thePennsylvania Educational Technology Expo and Conference, Hershey, PA,February, 2008.Waddoups, G.L. (2004). Technology Integration, Curriculum, and Student Achievement: AReview ofScientifically Based Research and Implications for EasyTech. Portland, OR:Learning.com. Retrievedfrom:<http://www.learning.com/documents/Learning.com_WP_Summary.pdf.>Saladana&Johnny (2012). The coding manual for qualitative researchers. Sage.ISBN1446247376.27 "