Writing EXCELLENT 19.8 (19.8%) - 22 (22%) Paper is well organized, uses scholarly tone, follows APA Style, uses original writing and proper paraphrasing, contains very few or no writing and/or spelling errors, and is fully consistent with graduate-level writing style. Paper contains multiple, appropriate, and exemplary sources expected/required for the assignment. GOOD 17.6 (17.6%) - 19.7 (19.7%) Paper is mostly consistent with graduate-level writing style. Paper may have some small or infrequent organization, scholarly tone, or APA Style issues, and/or may contain a few writing and spelling errors, and/or somewhat less than the expected number of or type of sources. FAIR 15.4 (15.4%) - 17.5 (17.5%) Paper is somewhat below graduate-level writing style, with multiple smaller or a few major problems. Paper may be lacking in organization, scholarly tone, APA Style, and/or contain many writing and/or spelling errors, or shows moderate reliance on quoting versus original writing and paraphrasing. Paper may contain inferior resources (number or quality).

POOR 0 (0%) - 18.1 (18.1%) Paper’s critique is inappropriate. It is either based on a weak understanding of the source’s methods, or it is not based on empirical evidence (e.g., it is based on an emotional reaction to the source’s content). Application EXCELLENT 23.4 (23.4%) - 26 (26%) Paper provides a clear justification for how the source is applicable to one’s research question/research interests. The paper addresses the extent to which the source’s topic is similar to one’s research interests, how the source’s method is applicable to one’s research, and how the source helps to guide one’s own research. Overall, the application of this source to one’s research is very clear. GOOD 20.8 (20.8%) - 23.3 (23.3%) Paper provides a justification for how the source is applicable to one’s research, but there is some uncertainty about how the source provides a framework for one’s research (e.g., the connection between the source’s method, framework, or conclusions to one’s research is not clear). FAIR 18.2 (18.2%) - 20.7 (20.7%) Paper provides some justification for how the source is similar to one’s research, but its application is unclear.

Critique EXCELLENT 23.4 (23.4%) - 26 (26%) Paper provides a thorough and dispassionate critique or analysis of the source, addressing both its good and bad qualities. The critique addresses how aligned the research question is to the existing body of knowledge, the appropriateness of the theoretical or conceptual framework to the study, the sufficiency of the methods and design, and the generalizability/transferability of the results in other contexts. The paper also provides a critical analysis of the social change implications of the study’s findings. GOOD 20.8 (20.8%) - 23.3 (23.3%) Paper provides a critique of the source, addressing both its good and bad qualities, but does not cover all important aspects of the source (e.g., might be missing a critique of the methods, designs, framework, or conclusions). FAIR 18.2 (18.2%) - 20.7 (20.7%) Paper provides a critique of the source but is missing several important domains or some of the critiques are emotionally laden, not dispassionate.

Assignment Grading Rubric Detail Summary EXCELLENT 23.4 (23.4%) - 26 (26%) Paper provides an excellent overview of all important information from the source, including the topic of the source, the methods they employed, the theoretical or conceptual basis of the study, and the conclusions. GOOD 20.8 (20.8%) - 23.3 (23.3%) Paper provides an overview of the important information from the source, although some aspects of the summary (e.g., descriptions of the methods, the theoretical or conceptual framework, the conclusions) are less detailed than others. FAIR 18.2 (18.2%) - 20.7 (20.7%) Paper provides only a cursory review of the source. Several important domains are either missing altogether or are insufficiently explained. POOR 0 (0%) - 18.1 (18.1%) Paper provides little to no information about what the source was about. The source’s topic, methods, framework, and/or conclusions are either absent or very unclear.

Please Note -The tutor should please answer all the questions asked. - Use the peer-reviewed journal provided and attached. - Go through the example provided to see how the questions should be answered. - Go through the assignment grading rubric to ensure that all points are covered in the solution. Thanks