Great service served by Experts Mind.com, the solution was handed in time and quality of the work was excellent. I recommend Experts Mind.com services to everyone looking for authentic and affordable help.

Research Weighting 20% No authoritative sources, no evidence of research or not relevant for the task. Very limited understanding. The research has not been linked to the main text. Less than 2 authoritative sources or sources are not relevant for the task. Limited understanding. Little evidence of meaningful integration of the research with the main text. 2-3 scholarly sources. Some sources lack relevance or authority but are still appropriate for the task. Adequate understanding. The research could be incorporated with the main text more consistently. 3-4 scholarly sources. Sources are mostly well-chosen, authoritative and appropriate for the task. Good understanding. The research is integrated with the main text. 4-5 scholarly sources. Sources are well- chosen, authoritative and are appropriate for the task. Excellent understanding. The research is very well integrated with the main text.

Writing Weighting 5% No consideration for presentation. Muddled writing that is very difficult to follow. Numerous grammatical errors. Acceptable presentation. Long winded and some clear writing presentation. Some grammatical errors. Tidy presentation. Mostly clear writing but at times long winded. Writing style lacks consideration. Few issues around grammar. Professional presentation. Clear writing mainly to the point. Considered writing style. Polished presentation. Clear and concise writing. Mature and appropriate writing style. Excellent grammar, correct in all aspects.

Organisation/ logic Weighting 5% No flow. No argument. Poorly organised and difficult to read. Does not flow logically from one part to another. The argument is not clear. Generally well organised although the flow of the argument is not always logical. Argument is clear and mostly sound. Coherently organised and logical formation of sound argument. Exceptionally well structured. Logic is easy to follow. Arguments are sound and convincing.

Discuss the cultural aspects of communication within teams. Weighting 20% Multicultural communication is not discussed. No examples are given Multicultural communication is not explained with any clarity. The examples are poorly chosen and lack relevance. The concept of multicultural communication is explained adequately and the analysis gives some examples but could be strengthened by more relevant examples. Good insight into multicultural communication within a team. Examples and discussion demonstrate a good depth of understanding. Excellent insight into multicultural communication in a team context.. Points made show an in depth knowledge and go well beyond the obvious. Excellent selection of relevant examples.

Team processes and their effect on team functions Explaining the selected leadership role Weighting 10% The leadership role is not explained No examples are given. The leadership role is not explained with any clarity. Examples are poorly chosen and lack relevance. The leadership role is explained adequately and the analysis gives some examples but could be strengthened by more relevant examples. Good insight into leadership roles shown. Examples and discussion demonstrate a good depth of understanding. Excellent insight into leadership roles. Points made show an in depth knowledge and go well beyond the obvious. Excellent selection of relevant examples.

Team processes and their effect on team functions Decision making Weighting 20% Does not discuss decision making and the effect of that team process on team functions. Decision making in the context of team processes and their effect on team functions is not discussed adequately. Points made are unclear. Examples are sparse or irrelevant. Decision making in the context of team processes and their effect on team functions is discussed adequately. Points made are clear but would benefit from more detail. Examples are adequate. Good insight shown into decision making in the context of team processes and their effect on team functions Points made with clarity and covered in some depth. Good selection of relevant examples. Excellent insight into decision making in the context of team processes and their effect on team functions. Points made show great insight and go well beyond the obvious. Excellent selection of convincing examples.

C (50-64) B (65-79) A (80-100) Links shown between leadership styles, other team process and team functions are adequate, but would benefit from more detail and discussion. The impact of the leadership style is discussed and is adequate but would be improved with more depth. Links shown between leadership styles, other team process and team functions are in depth The impact of the leadership style discussed is explored in depth. Some interesting points made. Links shown between leadership styles, other team process and team functions are insightful and multidimensional. Discussion on the impact of the leadership style is in great depth and well beyond the obvious.

This is a compulsory assignment. It must be submitted and it makes up 20% of your final result for this paper. The completed assignment is to be submitted to your facilitator via Blackboard by the due date. Criteria E (0-39) D (40-49) Team processes and their effect on team functions Leadership styles Weighting 15% The leadership style of the chosen leader is not discussed with any clarity. There is no link shown between leadership styles, other team process and team functions. The impact of the style of the chosen leader is not discussed. Links are shown between leadership styles, other team process and team functions, but are still unclear in parts. The impact of leadership styles needs to be discussed with more clarity.