Variation of securities-executorship laws and accounts, Financial Accounting

Variation of securities

It would seem logical to carry out a strict apportionment between income and capital every time investments are bought or sold. If this were done, it would be necessary to divide the purchase price or sale proceeds between the pure capital element and the adjustment of income rights.

In practice, this is not done, following the rules of convenience, on the grounds that it unnecessarily complicates the accounts.  The situation is, therefore, as follows:

1. Purchase of investment cum. div.  The life tenant is entitled to the whole income when received, except where the investment is purchased cum. div. after the dividend has been declared, when the whole dividend goes to capital (Re. Peel's Settled Estates).

2. Disposal of investment cum. div. The life tenant is not entitled to any of the sale proceeds (Scholefield v. Redfern).

3. Disposal of investment ex. div.  The whole dividend received after disposal belongs to the life tenant. Any organized course of action to the detriment of the life tenant or the remainderman would be actionable by that party as a breach of trust.

Posted Date: 12/13/2012 5:27:21 AM | Location : United States







Related Discussions:- Variation of securities-executorship laws and accounts, Assignment Help, Ask Question on Variation of securities-executorship laws and accounts, Get Answer, Expert's Help, Variation of securities-executorship laws and accounts Discussions

Write discussion on Variation of securities-executorship laws and accounts
Your posts are moderated
Related Questions
I have a presentation on an article (around 20 pages). I also need 2 current real life examples (2 companies) to support the presentation. Can you do that? How long it will take yo

Absorption costing is a cost accounting method that tries to charge all direct costs and all production costs of an organization to specific units of pr


APPLICABILITY OF THE OPERATING CYCLE IN VEGETABLE GROWING BUSINESS

The business changed their policy with regards to the profit mark-upfrom 2018 to 2019 financial year. What was the changed.

On 1 January 2009, a company, Yeti, granted an employee the right to choose between (i) 30,000 Yeti shares or (ii) a cash-payment equivalent to the price of 24,000 Yeti shares on 3

Q. Problems and difficulties associated with forecasting? We have relied to a great degree on the forecasting of data in order to provide an evaluation of the proposal. Not the

RSC Designs quarterly selling and distribution expenses are $100,000 including ($10,000 depreciation), and are expected to be paid in the quarter incurred. Quarterly administrat

Beginning balance 24,000 cash Sales 250,000 Gross profit 45% of sales Accounts receivable increase by 24,000 Accounts payable increased by 51,000 Inventory increased by 98,000 Sell

BFD Co has occurrence rapid growth in turnover since its formation three years ago but it has been unable to maintain net profit margin which has fallen from 19% in 2002 to 12% in