Use of shares of the minority, Business Law and Ethics

Use of shares of the minority:

X, Y and Z held 4,500, 4,500 and 1,000 one pound shares respectively, of Company B.  They were the only shareholders and  X and Y were the directors.  X and Y wished to eliminate Z.  S.210 however is not available to individuals.  So X and Y formed a new company (Company A) in which they were the only two shareholders.  Company A then offered to acquire all the shares of Company B.  X and Y accepted the offer but Z did not.  Company A served notice on Z that it has secured 90 per cent acceptance (the shares of X and Y) and intended to acquire Z's 1,000 shares under s.210.  Z applied to court.

Held:

Company A was a sham since (lifting the veil of incorporation) it was merely the majority shareholders (X and Y) in Company B seeking to expropriate the shares of the minority (Z). S.210 could not be used in these circumstances.  Z's objections were upheld.

 The alternative to acquisition under s.210 (in a take-over bid) is a scheme of arrangement under s.207.  The choice may be determined by comparative costs (see paragraphs 8.3.7(c) and 8.3.8).  Stamp duty is payable (at the two per cent ad valorem rate) on transfers of shares of Company B in a transaction to which s.210 applies.  It can be avoided under s.207.  But under s.210 procedure there is usually no expense of court proceeds as few minority shareholders persist in their objections to the point of making application to the court (at some expense to themselves).

 On the other hand if there is uncertainty about obtaining 90 per cent acceptance and a scheme of arrangement is not excessive in costs it is an easier route to the intended result.  It is particularly useful when Company A is seeking to acquire those shares of a partly-owned subsidiary (Company B) which it does not own.  In such cases some minority shareholders of B may be indifferent or passively opposed; Company A cannot count on their acceptances (to achieve 90 per cent) but reckons that they cannot or will not deny it a three quarters majority at a meeting.  There is often a delicate balance of conflicting risks and considerations in choosing between s.207 and s.210 in such situations.

Posted Date: 1/15/2013 4:32:32 AM | Location : United States







Related Discussions:- Use of shares of the minority, Assignment Help, Ask Question on Use of shares of the minority, Get Answer, Expert's Help, Use of shares of the minority Discussions

Write discussion on Use of shares of the minority
Your posts are moderated
Related Questions
Liability of auditors: It would cover any act of negligence - any actionable wrong by an officer of a company which did not involve any misapplication of the assets of the com

Estate Planning Case Study Rich and his wife, Ruby, heard that you are an expert in the field of Estate Planning as a result of the superior education you received at WPU.  The

3 ways in which the restaurant can engage in socially responsive activities in the community within which it operates.

Transfer of Immovable Property By S.54 Property Act, 1882 as Note: This Act is applicable in the US requires that a transfer of immovable property worth over as 100 rupees mus

I don''t know how to make a maxim. And my case is

What are the effects of the monetary expansion The first diagram corresponds to the case when both countries maintain a fixed exchange rate, and the second is when they allow

Loans to Directors: Section 191(1) renders unlawful any loan made by a company to a director of the company or its holding company. It is also unlawful for the company to guar

Define the act of Obstructions of Justice UNCTOC has also criminalized the act of Obstructions of Justice and it is stated in the Article 23 that. "Each State Party shall adopt

Explain the Nuclear law Nuclear law Nuclear Law is a branch of International Law that surrounds, regulates and administers issues regarding nuclear weapons. It is also ass