Use of shares of the minority, Business Law and Ethics

Use of shares of the minority:

X, Y and Z held 4,500, 4,500 and 1,000 one pound shares respectively, of Company B.  They were the only shareholders and  X and Y were the directors.  X and Y wished to eliminate Z.  S.210 however is not available to individuals.  So X and Y formed a new company (Company A) in which they were the only two shareholders.  Company A then offered to acquire all the shares of Company B.  X and Y accepted the offer but Z did not.  Company A served notice on Z that it has secured 90 per cent acceptance (the shares of X and Y) and intended to acquire Z's 1,000 shares under s.210.  Z applied to court.

Held:

Company A was a sham since (lifting the veil of incorporation) it was merely the majority shareholders (X and Y) in Company B seeking to expropriate the shares of the minority (Z). S.210 could not be used in these circumstances.  Z's objections were upheld.

 The alternative to acquisition under s.210 (in a take-over bid) is a scheme of arrangement under s.207.  The choice may be determined by comparative costs (see paragraphs 8.3.7(c) and 8.3.8).  Stamp duty is payable (at the two per cent ad valorem rate) on transfers of shares of Company B in a transaction to which s.210 applies.  It can be avoided under s.207.  But under s.210 procedure there is usually no expense of court proceeds as few minority shareholders persist in their objections to the point of making application to the court (at some expense to themselves).

 On the other hand if there is uncertainty about obtaining 90 per cent acceptance and a scheme of arrangement is not excessive in costs it is an easier route to the intended result.  It is particularly useful when Company A is seeking to acquire those shares of a partly-owned subsidiary (Company B) which it does not own.  In such cases some minority shareholders of B may be indifferent or passively opposed; Company A cannot count on their acceptances (to achieve 90 per cent) but reckons that they cannot or will not deny it a three quarters majority at a meeting.  There is often a delicate balance of conflicting risks and considerations in choosing between s.207 and s.210 in such situations.

Posted Date: 1/15/2013 4:32:32 AM | Location : United States







Related Discussions:- Use of shares of the minority, Assignment Help, Ask Question on Use of shares of the minority, Get Answer, Expert's Help, Use of shares of the minority Discussions

Write discussion on Use of shares of the minority
Your posts are moderated
Related Questions
There are three main categories of international humanitarian laws: 1) The Hague conventions 2) The Geneva conventions 3) The additional protocols

Business Names:                             If a company has a place of business in Kenya and carries on business under a business name which does not consist of its corporate

Liquidators' Powers:                                       The liquidator (in any type of liquidation) has numerous statutory powers but in the exercise of some of them he mus

What are the organisations made up by United Nations? The United Nations was set up to make international public law after the Second World War. This is represented by nearly e

Your first big case is a multiple murder. As defense attorney for SyKopath, you have come to the realization that he really did break into a couple's home and torture and kill them

Hirer Requires Information from the Owner Conversely the hirer requires some information from the owner whether he should send him a written request so and then like pay to hi

Implied powers rule: The courts would regard such things as impliedly within the company's powers unless they are "expressly prohibited" by the memorandum. The range of transa

Resident Magistrate's Court Establishment Further Resident Magistrate's Court is constituted through S.3 (1) of the Magistrate's Courts Act that is provides that 'ther

State article 2 of International law Article 2 states that there is no right of a State under international law to diplomatic relations; these exist by mutual consent. However

Legal justification - Constructive notice: The legal justification for this rule is that since the company's public documents in its file at the Companies Registry are availab