Use of shares of the minority, Business Law and Ethics

Use of shares of the minority:

X, Y and Z held 4,500, 4,500 and 1,000 one pound shares respectively, of Company B.  They were the only shareholders and  X and Y were the directors.  X and Y wished to eliminate Z.  S.210 however is not available to individuals.  So X and Y formed a new company (Company A) in which they were the only two shareholders.  Company A then offered to acquire all the shares of Company B.  X and Y accepted the offer but Z did not.  Company A served notice on Z that it has secured 90 per cent acceptance (the shares of X and Y) and intended to acquire Z's 1,000 shares under s.210.  Z applied to court.

Held:

Company A was a sham since (lifting the veil of incorporation) it was merely the majority shareholders (X and Y) in Company B seeking to expropriate the shares of the minority (Z). S.210 could not be used in these circumstances.  Z's objections were upheld.

 The alternative to acquisition under s.210 (in a take-over bid) is a scheme of arrangement under s.207.  The choice may be determined by comparative costs (see paragraphs 8.3.7(c) and 8.3.8).  Stamp duty is payable (at the two per cent ad valorem rate) on transfers of shares of Company B in a transaction to which s.210 applies.  It can be avoided under s.207.  But under s.210 procedure there is usually no expense of court proceeds as few minority shareholders persist in their objections to the point of making application to the court (at some expense to themselves).

 On the other hand if there is uncertainty about obtaining 90 per cent acceptance and a scheme of arrangement is not excessive in costs it is an easier route to the intended result.  It is particularly useful when Company A is seeking to acquire those shares of a partly-owned subsidiary (Company B) which it does not own.  In such cases some minority shareholders of B may be indifferent or passively opposed; Company A cannot count on their acceptances (to achieve 90 per cent) but reckons that they cannot or will not deny it a three quarters majority at a meeting.  There is often a delicate balance of conflicting risks and considerations in choosing between s.207 and s.210 in such situations.

Posted Date: 1/15/2013 4:32:32 AM | Location : United States







Related Discussions:- Use of shares of the minority, Assignment Help, Ask Question on Use of shares of the minority, Get Answer, Expert's Help, Use of shares of the minority Discussions

Write discussion on Use of shares of the minority
Your posts are moderated
Related Questions
QUESTION 1 One of the main ingredients of a system of collective bargaining is the right to join and participate in the activities of a trade union. What is the extent of this

Promotion: A company comes into existence from the moment of its registration by the registrar of companies. However, the  registration is preceded by what is called "promotio

QUESTION 1 In the exercise of its disciplinary power an employer can terminate an employee's contract. Should an employer decide not to terminate the contract of employment, wh

Reconstruction Under S.280: The essential features of this type of reconstruction have been described at 8.2.1(b).  It is subject to several disadvantages and is little used.

Question 1: (A) What do you understand by Collective Bargaining? (B) What is collective bargaining from: (I) The economic point of view

Explain International Atomic Energy Agency The  NPT  also  creates  rights and  obligations on  the  members of  NPT  to  comply  with  the provisions of the treaty and to ensu

Q. Evaluate nature of phoenix activity? The literature on phoenix activity and the stakeholders consulted in this project emphasised that phoenix activity has evolved significa

Agency Law - Agency and Partnership Sources of Agency Law However the law of agency in the US is based on the common law rules that have been developed through the Engl

Advantage of the information on the legislature The main result was that voters take advantage of the information on the legislature - executive trade-offs in policy process. W

steeple analysis about setting up a buisiness