Use of shares of the minority, Business Law and Ethics

Use of shares of the minority:

X, Y and Z held 4,500, 4,500 and 1,000 one pound shares respectively, of Company B.  They were the only shareholders and  X and Y were the directors.  X and Y wished to eliminate Z.  S.210 however is not available to individuals.  So X and Y formed a new company (Company A) in which they were the only two shareholders.  Company A then offered to acquire all the shares of Company B.  X and Y accepted the offer but Z did not.  Company A served notice on Z that it has secured 90 per cent acceptance (the shares of X and Y) and intended to acquire Z's 1,000 shares under s.210.  Z applied to court.

Held:

Company A was a sham since (lifting the veil of incorporation) it was merely the majority shareholders (X and Y) in Company B seeking to expropriate the shares of the minority (Z). S.210 could not be used in these circumstances.  Z's objections were upheld.

 The alternative to acquisition under s.210 (in a take-over bid) is a scheme of arrangement under s.207.  The choice may be determined by comparative costs (see paragraphs 8.3.7(c) and 8.3.8).  Stamp duty is payable (at the two per cent ad valorem rate) on transfers of shares of Company B in a transaction to which s.210 applies.  It can be avoided under s.207.  But under s.210 procedure there is usually no expense of court proceeds as few minority shareholders persist in their objections to the point of making application to the court (at some expense to themselves).

 On the other hand if there is uncertainty about obtaining 90 per cent acceptance and a scheme of arrangement is not excessive in costs it is an easier route to the intended result.  It is particularly useful when Company A is seeking to acquire those shares of a partly-owned subsidiary (Company B) which it does not own.  In such cases some minority shareholders of B may be indifferent or passively opposed; Company A cannot count on their acceptances (to achieve 90 per cent) but reckons that they cannot or will not deny it a three quarters majority at a meeting.  There is often a delicate balance of conflicting risks and considerations in choosing between s.207 and s.210 in such situations.

Posted Date: 1/15/2013 4:32:32 AM | Location : United States







Related Discussions:- Use of shares of the minority, Assignment Help, Ask Question on Use of shares of the minority, Get Answer, Expert's Help, Use of shares of the minority Discussions

Write discussion on Use of shares of the minority
Your posts are moderated
Related Questions
QUESTION 1 What are the scope and limitations of administrative law? Is the demarcation clear? What are the criteria by which you would decide on which side of the line a case

QUESTION The Occupational, Safety and Health Act 2005 states that Every employer shall, so far as is reasonably practicable, ensure the safety, health and welfare at work of

What are the international policies  -  Policy process In international policy, (politics) each state is part of a system and each is the guardian of its own security and indep

Q. Indicator based definition of phoenix activity? Many stakeholders emphasised the importance of educating the community about the signs or indicators of phoenix activity. A d

Recovery of Possession of Goods However below S.15 where two-thirds or more about the hire-purchase price has been paid the owner is such precluded from enforcing the rights a

Public Company - Registration Procedures: Consent to act as director (Form No 209) If any person is appointed director of the company by the articles which are to be deli

Committal Stage: In this such order 103 offers that a Bill having been read a second moment shall stand committed to a committee of the Whole House, unless the House commits t

what ethical issue relate to nuclear energy industry

i.Over the years a number of systems have been developed which record coded information across a range of factors about disabilities in ethnic communities. A new coding convention

Termination - Duties of Owner Although below S.12 of the Act the hirer may on any time before the final payment may or instalment falls due to terminate the agreement through li