Use of shares of the minority, Business Law and Ethics

Use of shares of the minority:

X, Y and Z held 4,500, 4,500 and 1,000 one pound shares respectively, of Company B.  They were the only shareholders and  X and Y were the directors.  X and Y wished to eliminate Z.  S.210 however is not available to individuals.  So X and Y formed a new company (Company A) in which they were the only two shareholders.  Company A then offered to acquire all the shares of Company B.  X and Y accepted the offer but Z did not.  Company A served notice on Z that it has secured 90 per cent acceptance (the shares of X and Y) and intended to acquire Z's 1,000 shares under s.210.  Z applied to court.

Held:

Company A was a sham since (lifting the veil of incorporation) it was merely the majority shareholders (X and Y) in Company B seeking to expropriate the shares of the minority (Z). S.210 could not be used in these circumstances.  Z's objections were upheld.

 The alternative to acquisition under s.210 (in a take-over bid) is a scheme of arrangement under s.207.  The choice may be determined by comparative costs (see paragraphs 8.3.7(c) and 8.3.8).  Stamp duty is payable (at the two per cent ad valorem rate) on transfers of shares of Company B in a transaction to which s.210 applies.  It can be avoided under s.207.  But under s.210 procedure there is usually no expense of court proceeds as few minority shareholders persist in their objections to the point of making application to the court (at some expense to themselves).

 On the other hand if there is uncertainty about obtaining 90 per cent acceptance and a scheme of arrangement is not excessive in costs it is an easier route to the intended result.  It is particularly useful when Company A is seeking to acquire those shares of a partly-owned subsidiary (Company B) which it does not own.  In such cases some minority shareholders of B may be indifferent or passively opposed; Company A cannot count on their acceptances (to achieve 90 per cent) but reckons that they cannot or will not deny it a three quarters majority at a meeting.  There is often a delicate balance of conflicting risks and considerations in choosing between s.207 and s.210 in such situations.

Posted Date: 1/15/2013 4:32:32 AM | Location : United States







Related Discussions:- Use of shares of the minority, Assignment Help, Ask Question on Use of shares of the minority, Get Answer, Expert's Help, Use of shares of the minority Discussions

Write discussion on Use of shares of the minority
Your posts are moderated
Related Questions
Requisites of Acceptance - Rules Relating To Acceptance Section number S.17 (2) provides like an acceptance is invalid unless since it complies with the following conditions:

Contract for Work and Materials In Robinson v Graves a dispute arose over an agreement below such an artist had promised to make a portrait about 250 guineas. So query had to

How to solve multiple equilibria problem The approach of equilibrium selection to solve multiple equilibria problem aims to retain the definition of equilibrium and accepts th

Star Club is a casino established in mid-eighties in Sri Lanka. Since it is in the business for more than 25 years it is famous among local and foreign gamblers. John has been work

Prospectus Issue And Statutory Provisions: A company's shares are legally regarded as goods. Consequently, the common law rule known as "caveat emptor" applied to their sale.

District Magistrate's Court - Criminal Jurisdiction However Statute Law like as Miscellaneous Amendments Act 1983 amended the criminal jurisdiction of district magistrate's co

Define the term - Media are a potentially privileged Media are a potentially privileged means of communication in three ways: They help to coordinate and link policy relevant a

Purpose of the rule: It has been stated by various English judges that without the rule in Foss v Harbottle (i)            There would be futile actions.  A court order

Assignments should be submitted on or before the due date. Zero mark will follow late submission of an assignment unless you have an acceptable reason approved by the instructor.

Disadvantages of Stare Decisis - Rigidity However the case law method of administration of justice has been criticized on the grounds which it leads to rigidity because the di