Use of shares of the minority, Business Law and Ethics

Use of shares of the minority:

X, Y and Z held 4,500, 4,500 and 1,000 one pound shares respectively, of Company B.  They were the only shareholders and  X and Y were the directors.  X and Y wished to eliminate Z.  S.210 however is not available to individuals.  So X and Y formed a new company (Company A) in which they were the only two shareholders.  Company A then offered to acquire all the shares of Company B.  X and Y accepted the offer but Z did not.  Company A served notice on Z that it has secured 90 per cent acceptance (the shares of X and Y) and intended to acquire Z's 1,000 shares under s.210.  Z applied to court.

Held:

Company A was a sham since (lifting the veil of incorporation) it was merely the majority shareholders (X and Y) in Company B seeking to expropriate the shares of the minority (Z). S.210 could not be used in these circumstances.  Z's objections were upheld.

 The alternative to acquisition under s.210 (in a take-over bid) is a scheme of arrangement under s.207.  The choice may be determined by comparative costs (see paragraphs 8.3.7(c) and 8.3.8).  Stamp duty is payable (at the two per cent ad valorem rate) on transfers of shares of Company B in a transaction to which s.210 applies.  It can be avoided under s.207.  But under s.210 procedure there is usually no expense of court proceeds as few minority shareholders persist in their objections to the point of making application to the court (at some expense to themselves).

 On the other hand if there is uncertainty about obtaining 90 per cent acceptance and a scheme of arrangement is not excessive in costs it is an easier route to the intended result.  It is particularly useful when Company A is seeking to acquire those shares of a partly-owned subsidiary (Company B) which it does not own.  In such cases some minority shareholders of B may be indifferent or passively opposed; Company A cannot count on their acceptances (to achieve 90 per cent) but reckons that they cannot or will not deny it a three quarters majority at a meeting.  There is often a delicate balance of conflicting risks and considerations in choosing between s.207 and s.210 in such situations.

Posted Date: 1/15/2013 4:32:32 AM | Location : United States







Related Discussions:- Use of shares of the minority, Assignment Help, Ask Question on Use of shares of the minority, Get Answer, Expert's Help, Use of shares of the minority Discussions

Write discussion on Use of shares of the minority
Your posts are moderated
Related Questions
1. Explain the role of ‘Ethics' in Entrepreneurship. 2. What do you understand by ‘Public Limited Company'? 3. Difference between ‘Intrapreneur' & ‘Intrepreneur'. 4. What is ‘Copyr

Question 1: (a) Discuss the powers and duties of the employer under the Employment Rights Act 2008? (b) Discuss the powers and duties of the worker under the Employme

Perpetual Succession:                      According to the Concise Oxford Dictionary, "perpetual" means, inter alia, "applicable, valid, for ever or for indefinite time " wh

What forces the policy maker to obey the law When law directs a policy maker to carryout policy, what forces the policy maker to obey the law? When there is no restriction from

Relate the military and economic power with each other The balance of military and economic power of equilibrium is therefore desirable. A balance of power is a pre-requisite f

Q. Diffrence between phoenix activity and  honest behaviour? There are circumstances where a business has been managed responsibly and fails, and after a period of time, its di

Variation of class rights of the preference shareholders: This was not a variation of class rights of the preference shareholders.  The company could resolve to go keen on liq

What is Recessionary Bias To illustrate the possibility of recessionary bias we assume that both countries have two policy objectives but only one policy instrument. The policy

Former Assistant Treasurer Bill Shorten has cited estimates, based on ATO expertise, that there are 6,000 phoenix operators in Australia. It is recognised that this estimate is a ‘

QUORUM: However a quorum is the minimum number of persons who must be present at a meeting in order that the meeting may validly transact the business for that it was convened