Use of shares of the minority, Business Law and Ethics

Use of shares of the minority:

X, Y and Z held 4,500, 4,500 and 1,000 one pound shares respectively, of Company B.  They were the only shareholders and  X and Y were the directors.  X and Y wished to eliminate Z.  S.210 however is not available to individuals.  So X and Y formed a new company (Company A) in which they were the only two shareholders.  Company A then offered to acquire all the shares of Company B.  X and Y accepted the offer but Z did not.  Company A served notice on Z that it has secured 90 per cent acceptance (the shares of X and Y) and intended to acquire Z's 1,000 shares under s.210.  Z applied to court.

Held:

Company A was a sham since (lifting the veil of incorporation) it was merely the majority shareholders (X and Y) in Company B seeking to expropriate the shares of the minority (Z). S.210 could not be used in these circumstances.  Z's objections were upheld.

 The alternative to acquisition under s.210 (in a take-over bid) is a scheme of arrangement under s.207.  The choice may be determined by comparative costs (see paragraphs 8.3.7(c) and 8.3.8).  Stamp duty is payable (at the two per cent ad valorem rate) on transfers of shares of Company B in a transaction to which s.210 applies.  It can be avoided under s.207.  But under s.210 procedure there is usually no expense of court proceeds as few minority shareholders persist in their objections to the point of making application to the court (at some expense to themselves).

 On the other hand if there is uncertainty about obtaining 90 per cent acceptance and a scheme of arrangement is not excessive in costs it is an easier route to the intended result.  It is particularly useful when Company A is seeking to acquire those shares of a partly-owned subsidiary (Company B) which it does not own.  In such cases some minority shareholders of B may be indifferent or passively opposed; Company A cannot count on their acceptances (to achieve 90 per cent) but reckons that they cannot or will not deny it a three quarters majority at a meeting.  There is often a delicate balance of conflicting risks and considerations in choosing between s.207 and s.210 in such situations.

Posted Date: 1/15/2013 4:32:32 AM | Location : United States







Related Discussions:- Use of shares of the minority, Assignment Help, Ask Question on Use of shares of the minority, Get Answer, Expert's Help, Use of shares of the minority Discussions

Write discussion on Use of shares of the minority
Your posts are moderated
Related Questions
Question 1: (a) Expliquez les conditions qui doivent être réunis pour la formation d'un contrat. (b) Expliquez les differentes modes selon lesquels un contrat peut prendre

List of Members: S.130(6) provides that the directors shall cause a list showing the names and postal addresses of the members of the company, and the number of shares held th

Principles and Presumptions of Construction: However in the course of settling some of these disputes the courts in England have elaborated the rules that they will utilized i

Negotiable Instruments - Law of Contract However past services may constitute valuable consideration to a bill of exchange under by s.27 of the Bills of Exchange Act that prov

Question : a. What are the procedures established under the Employment Rights Act 2008 on the reporting of labour disputes? b. One of the fundamental requirements of a val

Many stakeholders emphasised that it would be difficult to quantify phoenix activity as phoenix operators are very skilled at 'flying under the radar'. Impacts, beyond those listed

# difference between variation of class right and variation of enjoyment

State Montevideo Convention Montevideo Convention states : "The political existence of the state is independent of recognition by other States. Even before recognition the st

Acceptance - Negotiable Instruments Meaning The word "acceptance" such used in relation to bills of exchange like has a special meaning also. Acceptance of a bill of ex

an impartial jury must