Use of shares of the minority, Business Law and Ethics

Use of shares of the minority:

X, Y and Z held 4,500, 4,500 and 1,000 one pound shares respectively, of Company B.  They were the only shareholders and  X and Y were the directors.  X and Y wished to eliminate Z.  S.210 however is not available to individuals.  So X and Y formed a new company (Company A) in which they were the only two shareholders.  Company A then offered to acquire all the shares of Company B.  X and Y accepted the offer but Z did not.  Company A served notice on Z that it has secured 90 per cent acceptance (the shares of X and Y) and intended to acquire Z's 1,000 shares under s.210.  Z applied to court.

Held:

Company A was a sham since (lifting the veil of incorporation) it was merely the majority shareholders (X and Y) in Company B seeking to expropriate the shares of the minority (Z). S.210 could not be used in these circumstances.  Z's objections were upheld.

 The alternative to acquisition under s.210 (in a take-over bid) is a scheme of arrangement under s.207.  The choice may be determined by comparative costs (see paragraphs 8.3.7(c) and 8.3.8).  Stamp duty is payable (at the two per cent ad valorem rate) on transfers of shares of Company B in a transaction to which s.210 applies.  It can be avoided under s.207.  But under s.210 procedure there is usually no expense of court proceeds as few minority shareholders persist in their objections to the point of making application to the court (at some expense to themselves).

 On the other hand if there is uncertainty about obtaining 90 per cent acceptance and a scheme of arrangement is not excessive in costs it is an easier route to the intended result.  It is particularly useful when Company A is seeking to acquire those shares of a partly-owned subsidiary (Company B) which it does not own.  In such cases some minority shareholders of B may be indifferent or passively opposed; Company A cannot count on their acceptances (to achieve 90 per cent) but reckons that they cannot or will not deny it a three quarters majority at a meeting.  There is often a delicate balance of conflicting risks and considerations in choosing between s.207 and s.210 in such situations.

Posted Date: 1/15/2013 4:32:32 AM | Location : United States







Related Discussions:- Use of shares of the minority, Assignment Help, Ask Question on Use of shares of the minority, Get Answer, Expert's Help, Use of shares of the minority Discussions

Write discussion on Use of shares of the minority
Your posts are moderated
Related Questions
Describe in detail about the European Monetary Union The experimental lab for international policy coordination has been the European Union where monetary unification of member

Question 1: The question of morality of Public Servants has become a public issue nowadays. What according to you are the factors that have contributed to such a situation?

Question : Mr Brown was employed by Sun Company Ltd as manager of Star Hotel on a 3 year contract starting 1 st July 1990. It was agreed that either side may put an end to the

Termination of an Offer - Revocation Such offer is "revoked" whether the offeror changes his thinking and withdraws it as for expressly or impliedly.  However to be valid suc

State succession concerns international organizations Issue regarding state succession concerns international organizations. There are more than 30,000 treaties entered into be

Question 1: (a) What do you meant by the term misconduct in employment law. How does the English definition of misconduct differ from the French definition of misconduct? (b

Question 1: (a) Describe about a Trade Union. (b) Show the objectives of the Trade Union in the Republic of Mauritius. Justify your answer. (c) If you were nominated as

Restricted Names:  Section 17)1) of the Registration of Business Names Act provides that no company shall be registered under a business name: (a)     which contains any wo

Mode of Alteration:  The alteration of capital may be made by - 1) Increasing the company's share capital by new shares of such amount as the resolution prescribes; or 2

Usual business at an annual general meeting: The registrar is not bound to call or direct the calling of the meeting but, in the event of his refusing to do so, the aggrieved