Universality problem, Theory of Computation

The Universality Problem is the dual of the emptiness problem: is L(A) = Σ∗?

It can be solved by minor variations of any one of the algorithms for Emptiness or (with a little less work) it can simply be reduced to Emptiness.

Theorem (Universality) The Universality Problem for Regular Languages is decidable.

Proof: L(A) = Σ*⇔ L(A) = ∅. As regular languages are effectively closed under complement we can simply build the DFA for the complement of L(A) and ask if it recognizes the empty language.

Posted Date: 3/21/2013 1:55:24 AM | Location : United States







Related Discussions:- Universality problem, Assignment Help, Ask Question on Universality problem, Get Answer, Expert's Help, Universality problem Discussions

Write discussion on Universality problem
Your posts are moderated
Related Questions
Computation of a DFA or NFA without ε-transitions An ID (q 1 ,w 1 ) computes (qn,wn) in A = (Q,Σ, T, q 0 , F) (in zero or more steps) if there is a sequence of IDs (q 1

Our primary concern is to obtain a clear characterization of which languages are recognizable by strictly local automata and which aren't. The view of SL2 automata as generators le

Ask question #hhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhMinimum 100 words accepted#

This close relationship between the SL2 languages and the recognizable languages lets us use some of what we know about SL 2 to discover properties of the recognizable languages.

Both L 1 and L 2 are SL 2 . (You should verify this by thinking about what the automata look like.) We claim that L 1 ∪ L 2 ∈ SL 2 . To see this, suppose, by way of con

As de?ned the powerset construction builds a DFA with many states that can never be reached from Q′ 0 . Since they cannot be reached from Q′ 0 there is no path from Q′ 0 to a sta

For every regular language there is a constant n depending only on L such that, for all strings x ∈ L if |x| ≥ n then there are strings u, v and w such that 1. x = uvw, 2. |u

Design a turing machine to compute x + y (x,y > 0) with x an y in unary, seperated by a # (descrition and genereal idea is needed ... no need for all TM moves)

It is not hard to see that ε-transitions do not add to the accepting power of the model. The underlying idea is that whenever an ID (q, σ  v) directly computes another (p, v) via

Automaton (NFA) (with ε-transitions) is a 5-tuple: (Q,Σ, δ, q 0 , F i where Q, Σ, q 0 and F are as in a DFA and T ⊆ Q × Q × (Σ ∪ {ε}). We must also modify the de?nitions of th