Universality problem, Theory of Computation

The Universality Problem is the dual of the emptiness problem: is L(A) = Σ∗?

It can be solved by minor variations of any one of the algorithms for Emptiness or (with a little less work) it can simply be reduced to Emptiness.

Theorem (Universality) The Universality Problem for Regular Languages is decidable.

Proof: L(A) = Σ*⇔ L(A) = ∅. As regular languages are effectively closed under complement we can simply build the DFA for the complement of L(A) and ask if it recognizes the empty language.

Posted Date: 3/21/2013 1:55:24 AM | Location : United States







Related Discussions:- Universality problem, Assignment Help, Ask Question on Universality problem, Get Answer, Expert's Help, Universality problem Discussions

Write discussion on Universality problem
Your posts are moderated
Related Questions
As de?ned the powerset construction builds a DFA with many states that can never be reached from Q′ 0 . Since they cannot be reached from Q′ 0 there is no path from Q′ 0 to a sta

Prove that Language is non regular TRailing count={aa ba aaaa abaa baaa bbaa aaaaaa aabaaa abaaaa..... 1) Pumping Lemma 2)Myhill nerode

When an FSA is deterministic the set of triples encoding its edges represents a relation that is functional in its ?rst and third components: for every q and σ there is exactly one

For every regular language there is a constant n depending only on L such that, for all strings x ∈ L if |x| ≥ n then there are strings u, v and w such that 1. x = uvw, 2. |u

i want to do projects for theory of computation subject what topics should be best.


The Last Stop Boutique is having a five-day sale. Each day, starting on Monday, the price will drop 10% of the previous day’s price. For example, if the original price of a product

The universe of strings is a very useful medium for the representation of information as long as there exists a function that provides the interpretation for the information carrie

Both L 1 and L 2 are SL 2 . (You should verify this by thinking about what the automata look like.) We claim that L 1 ∪ L 2 ∈ SL 2 . To see this, suppose, by way of con

how to find whether the language is cfl or not?