Traditional case brief, Business Law and Ethics

The  defendants, while sympathetic, may believe that the ultimate responsibility of a child's safety and welfare belongs to the parent themselves. To the extent that the parents were aware the child was attending a party where alcohol was served, it was the parent's duties (Ryan's parents) to educate  their child about the dangers of alcohol consumption and drinking and driving.

From a social perspective, perhaps, each of them  should be  liable to some degree, especially where  there is  an adult knowingly violating the teenage drinking law. There should have been a social obligation for these parents to abide by the law, even if not out of personal concern for the minor children.

Moral convictions might weight against  the defendants.   It would seem that just a common sense notion of human decency and caring for children should have compelled the defendants to be more concerned about a young person drinking and driving.

In your traditional case brief, you will not have this section.  So, don't be confused or alarmed if you are unfamiliar with having this section in your case brief assignments.  For my courses, I ask students to include this section for several reasons, the most important of which is that it is an exercise in critical thinking.

An essential aspect to critical thinking is being able to evaluate the same set of facts from different and diverse perspectives.  This is a key skill in legal analysis, as you are tasked to think about the legal issues from not only your own or your client's perspective, but from that of opposing sides as well.  This is necessary so that you understand both the strengths and weaknesses of a case.  Moreover, it is a crucial aspect of demonstrating objectivity within the law.  As sometimes no matter how passionate you and/or the client might be about a particular matter, if the law does not support the position, then you have to be able to see and explain that.  The only way that you get to this understanding is being able to evaluate, articulate, and argue various perspectives.   It is often very easy for us to argue and support our own opinions and beliefs.   It is  much more challenging task to understand and articulate those opinions and beliefs to which we are opposed and/or unaware.

In this section, you don't have to believe it.  The task here is for you to be able to at least see the other  possible  perspectives,  understand the legitimate arguments that might be made from those  perspectives, and articulate those perspectives with the intellectual integrity  and vigor they merit.

Posted Date: 2/26/2013 4:41:35 AM | Location : United States







Related Discussions:- Traditional case brief, Assignment Help, Ask Question on Traditional case brief, Get Answer, Expert's Help, Traditional case brief Discussions

Write discussion on Traditional case brief
Your posts are moderated
Related Questions
Payee - Negotiable Instruments Some the payee like: (i) Section 7(1) gives such where a bill is not payable for the bearer, such the payee must be named otherwise indicated

Void Contracts - Law of Contract Whereas  the Infant's Relief Act 1874 of the UK applies to the US as a statute of general application such was in force in the UK on date 12 A

Determine the Case against Coordination Coming again to EMU platform we find some arguments against coordination also. For example, the core of the argument against coordinatio

Stakeholders felt the working definition was broadly appropriate. It was also noted that the Treasury definition, used as the working definition, has been endorsed by the ATO. A nu

QUESTION (a) Define the term 'contract' and explain the basic elements which constitute a valid and legally enforceable contract under the English Law (b) What do you unders

Question: Joe is the regional manager of a multinational company operating in your country. This business manufactures toys for children and sells them in several other countri

Determine the focal point for coordination The focal point for coordination is point C, which is the unique symmetrical Pareto efficient outcome. Compared to this outcome the N

Judicial and Legislative Function of Chief Justice Judicial Function However a judge of the High Court and the court of Appeal he participates in the adjudicatory proce

Directors liability: This was fraudulent preference and the bank must repay the sums received. The directors' liability under their guarantee to the bank then revived. A paym

Question: a. An Ethical dilemma is a complex situation that often involves an apparent mental conflict between moral imperatives, in which to obey one would result in transgre