Tort law assignment help: causation, Business Law and Ethics

The second factor which is necessary for a claimant to impose claim on other person is to have a cause for the action taken by him. Hence it is important to have a proper link between the breach caused by one person and the damage which has been done to other person. The general test would be why the damage has been done and action which is necessary for damage to be done. Case of McGhee vs National coal board, 1971 is a typical example of the above causation principle. In this case McGhee claimed over the hospital for the skin infection which was caused by the improper medicine being given by the hospital hence the main cause of the skin infection was the medicine given to him. Due to causation principle hospital was found liable for their action.

Another example of the causation principle is case of Barnett vs Chelsea Hospital management, 1968 where in Barnett swallowed the Arsenic and thereafter he was taken to the hospital. In hospital doctor denied to diagnose the patient and patient died after some time. But in this case there was no liability on the doctor due to causation principle as the damage was already done to the patient and patient would have died regardless of the diagnosis. Hence in this case there was no cause of damage involved from the side of doctor as it was involved in case of the McGhee vs National coal board case.

In our case wherein builder have poured in neat varnish in the bottle labelled with varnish there involved principle of causation. When builder is pouring varnish in water labelled bottle and leaving it unattended in this case there can be damage caused to the people who may use the bottle. Hence the cause is being linked with the damage done to any person. The general test which is applicable on the causation principle shows that there is strong relationship in our case between the breach and the damage being done. Due to breach and damage, causation has been developed between the two which is the main reason of the damage being caused to the person who have used the bottle. Hence the builder who has poured in varnish in water labelled bottle would be entirely liable for the damage being done to the person who have unknowingly used the water bottle. It shows that in our case causation is the main reason of the liability being imposed on the builder and there is no fault from the side of person who is using the bottle. Hence general test is applicable in all the conditions where in we have to find out liability of a person due to cause of damage and breach from that person.

Tort law assignment help is a part of law assignment help service that our online law assignment help experts provide. Law homework help in other law topics is also available to law students at a fairly cheap price.

Posted Date: 8/9/2012 3:58:01 AM | Location : United States

Related Discussions:- Tort law assignment help: causation, Assignment Help, Ask Question on Tort law assignment help: causation, Get Answer, Expert's Help, Tort law assignment help: causation Discussions

Write discussion on Tort law assignment help: causation
Your posts are moderated
Related Questions
Explain UNHCR UNHCR provides protection and assistance not only to refugees, but also to other categories of displaced or needy people. These include asylum seekers, refugees w

Registration Procedures: The procedures to be followed by persons who intend to form a registered company will depend on whether the proposed company is to be a public company

What is Codifying treaty Codifying treaty, meaning whereby, certain existing customary laws are codified in order to develop international law and make it binding between the s

Explain the important provisions of the UN charter Some important provisions of the UN charter are the Article 92, which makes the ICJ an integral part of the UN charter, Artic

I am an executive being transferred from my home city on the west coast to one in the Midwest. I know nothing about the city I'm moving to, but I have to buy a house there. Realtor

Frantic Fast Foods had earnings after taxes of $420,000 in 2012 with 309,000 shares outstanding. On January 1, 2013, the firm issued 20,000 new shares. Because of the proceeds from

Promotion: A company comes into existence from the moment of its registration by the registrar of companies. However, the  registration is preceded by what is called "promotio

Question: a. An Ethical dilemma is a complex situation that often involves an apparent mental conflict between moral imperatives, in which to obey one would result in transgre

Liquidators' Powers:                                       The liquidator (in any type of liquidation) has numerous statutory powers but in the exercise of some of them he mus

Question 1: (A) What are the functions of the Employment Relations Tribunal established under the Employment Relations Act 2008? (B) What are the functions of the Commissi