Tort law assignment help: causation, Business Law and Ethics

The second factor which is necessary for a claimant to impose claim on other person is to have a cause for the action taken by him. Hence it is important to have a proper link between the breach caused by one person and the damage which has been done to other person. The general test would be why the damage has been done and action which is necessary for damage to be done. Case of McGhee vs National coal board, 1971 is a typical example of the above causation principle. In this case McGhee claimed over the hospital for the skin infection which was caused by the improper medicine being given by the hospital hence the main cause of the skin infection was the medicine given to him. Due to causation principle hospital was found liable for their action.

Another example of the causation principle is case of Barnett vs Chelsea Hospital management, 1968 where in Barnett swallowed the Arsenic and thereafter he was taken to the hospital. In hospital doctor denied to diagnose the patient and patient died after some time. But in this case there was no liability on the doctor due to causation principle as the damage was already done to the patient and patient would have died regardless of the diagnosis. Hence in this case there was no cause of damage involved from the side of doctor as it was involved in case of the McGhee vs National coal board case.

In our case wherein builder have poured in neat varnish in the bottle labelled with varnish there involved principle of causation. When builder is pouring varnish in water labelled bottle and leaving it unattended in this case there can be damage caused to the people who may use the bottle. Hence the cause is being linked with the damage done to any person. The general test which is applicable on the causation principle shows that there is strong relationship in our case between the breach and the damage being done. Due to breach and damage, causation has been developed between the two which is the main reason of the damage being caused to the person who have used the bottle. Hence the builder who has poured in varnish in water labelled bottle would be entirely liable for the damage being done to the person who have unknowingly used the water bottle. It shows that in our case causation is the main reason of the liability being imposed on the builder and there is no fault from the side of person who is using the bottle. Hence general test is applicable in all the conditions where in we have to find out liability of a person due to cause of damage and breach from that person.

Tort law assignment help is a part of law assignment help service that our online law assignment help experts provide. Law homework help in other law topics is also available to law students at a fairly cheap price.

Posted Date: 8/9/2012 3:58:01 AM | Location : United States

Related Discussions:- Tort law assignment help: causation, Assignment Help, Ask Question on Tort law assignment help: causation, Get Answer, Expert's Help, Tort law assignment help: causation Discussions

Write discussion on Tort law assignment help: causation
Your posts are moderated
Related Questions
Strong and Weakness of Acts of Parliament: There an Act of Parliament may be said to possess the giving advantages: as; (i) Democratic in nature Now here it is democrati

As you have already learned during your tenure at Midwest Valueland (MV) and from exposure to business news, it is not unusual for leaders and managers to encounter ethical situati

Q. Describe the Cole Inquiry recommendation? In 2003 the Cole Inquiry made a range of recommendations to reform the building and construction industry. The Inquiry found that t

When was International Criminal Court for Rwanda established Moreover, in early 1990s the International Criminal Tribunal for Yugoslavia (ICTY) was established under UNSC Resol

State Article 29 of international law Article 29 states that a member of a diplomatic mission enjoys immunity from arrest or prosecution.

Advocates Whether in sec 3(1) of the Interpretation and General Provisions Act cap 2 and sec 2 of the Advocates Act (1989) an advocate is a person that whose name has been dul

Normal 0 false false false EN-IN X-NONE X-NONE MicrosoftInternetExplorer4

Country Strategy in harmonising national It is proposed that the OMC should enhance the role of such Country Strategy in harmonising national and EC aid programmes. The OMC wi

Correspond With Description - Terms Used In Contract With S.15 provides that, where goods are sold through description whether is an implied matter that the goods correspond w

REGULATIONS REGARDING ELECTRICITY : You are aware that electricity is the most common and convenient source of power. You know that carelessness in handling or maintenance of elec