It is a case study


The ChoicePoint Attack
ChoicePoint, a Georgia-based corporation, provides risk-management and fraud-prevention data. Traditionally, ChoicePoint provided motor vehicle reports, claims histories, and similar data to the automobile insurance industry; in recent years, it broadened its customer base to include general business and government agencies. Today, it also offers data for volunteer and job-applicant screening and data to assist in the location of missing children. ChoicePoint has over 4,000 employees, and its 2004 revenue was $918 million.
In the fall of 2004, ChoicePoint was the victim of a fraudulent spoofing attack in which unauthorized individuals posed as legitimate customers and obtained personal data on more than 145,000 individuals. According to the company''s Web site:
These criminals were able to pass our customer authentication due diligence processes by using stolen identities to create and produce the documents needed to appear legitimate. As small business customers of ChoicePoint, these fraudsters accessed products that contained basic telephone directory-type data (name and address information) as well as a combination of Social Security numbers and/or driver''s license numbers and, at times, abbreviated credit reports. They were also able to obtain other public record information including, but not limited to bankruptcies, liens, and judgments; professional licenses; and real property data.
ChoicePoint became aware of the problem in November 2004, when it noticed unusual processing activity on some accounts in Los Angeles. Accordingly, the company contacted the Los Angeles Police Department, which requested that ChoicePoint not reveal the activity until the department could conduct an investigation. In January, the LAPD notified ChoicePoint that it could contact the customers whose data had been compromised.
This crime is an example of a failure of authentication and not a network break-in. ChoicePoint''s firewalls and other safeguards were not overcome. Instead, the criminals spoofed legitimate businesses. The infiltrators obtained valid California business licenses, and until their unusual processing activity was detected, appeared to be legitimate users.
In response to this problem, ChoicePoint established a hotline for customers whose data were compromised to call for assistance. They also purchased a credit report for each of these people and paid for a one-year credit-report-monitoring service. In February 2005, attorneys initiated a class-action lawsuit for all 145,000 customers with an initial loss claim of $75,000 each. At the same time, the U.S. Senate announced that it would conduct an investigation.
Ironically, ChoicePoint exposed itself to a public relations nightmare, considerable expense, a class-action lawsuit, a Senate investigation, and a 20 percent drop in its share price because it contacted the police and cooperated in the attempt to apprehend the criminals. When ChoicePoint noticed the unusual account activity, had it simply shut down data access for the illegitimate businesses, no one would have known. Of course, the 145,000 customers whose identities had been compromised would have unknowingly been subject to identity theft, but it is unlikely that such thefts could have been tracked back to ChoicePoint.
Source: choicepoint.com/news/statement_0205_1.html#sub1 (accessed February 2005). Used with permission of Choice.Point.com.
Questions to be used as homework assignment prior to the case discussion or as the basis for a case discussion in class:

Choice Point Case

1. Itemize the nature of the information security breach at ChoicePoint and how this adversely affected the organization. Be sure to include both tangible and intangible losses in preparing your response. [table]
2. What actions were taken by both ChoicePoint and the “authorities” to address the crisis, and what is your assessment of each action taken? [table]
3. What reactive steps by ChoicePoint might have mitigated their losses subsequent to their discovery of the information security breach? Explain/justify your choices. [table]
4. What proactive steps by ChoicePoint might deter a reoccurrence of such an information security breach? Explain/justify your choices. [table]

Posted Date: 6/19/2013 2:06:18 PM | Location : United States

Ask an Expert

Related Discussions:- The ChoicePoint Attack Case Study, Assignment Help, Ask Question on The ChoicePoint Attack Case Study, Get Answer, Expert's Help, The ChoicePoint Attack Case Study Discussions

Write discussion on The ChoicePoint Attack Case Study
Your posts are moderated

Write your message here..

Related Questions

Management information system for library and information , MANAGEMENT  I... MANAGEMENT  INFORMATION SYSTEM FOR  LIBRARY AND INFORMATION  Users Regular members who have borrowing privileges and use the library well. Visitors who are not regular but use

What is web stickiness and how important is stickiness, Question 1: (a)... Question 1: (a) Explain in details the 5 main E-Business Models. (b) Explain the different factors to be taken into consideration in order to manage an E-Business infrastruc

Electronics, bjt and fet bjt and fet

Historical simulation approach, Ch 17 problem 17.11 What difference does it... Ch 17 problem 17.11 What difference does it make to the Var calculated in Example 17.2 if the exponentially weighted moving average model is used to assign weights to scenarios as

Homework, Hello are there experts that can help me with my MIS projects. th... Hello are there experts that can help me with my MIS projects. they are access and excel projects..

Functions of an information retrieval system, Functions of an IRS   Info... Functions of an IRS   Information Retrieval (IR) is best understood if one remembers the information being processed consists mainly of documents. In that context, IR deals with

Print materials - information materials, Print Materials: The author, ... Print Materials: The author, publisher and bookseller are all partners in turning ideas into a finished product. These groups operate  as a team with division of responsibilit

Devloping mis, problems and solution implementing mis problems and solution implementing mis

What do you understand by detailed system design, What is understand by Det... What is understand by Detailed System Design ? What are its main aims ? How is it carried out ? Illustrate through examples. Describe in brief : Enterprise Resource Planning (ER

Cobit 4.1 framework, CobiT 4.1 CobiT 4.1 is a very popular framework wh... CobiT 4.1 CobiT 4.1 is a very popular framework which mission is: "To research, develop, publicise and promote an authoritative, up-to-date, internationally accepted IT governa