The ChoicePoint Attack Case Study, Management Information Sys

It is a case study

The ChoicePoint Attack
ChoicePoint, a Georgia-based corporation, provides risk-management and fraud-prevention data. Traditionally, ChoicePoint provided motor vehicle reports, claims histories, and similar data to the automobile insurance industry; in recent years, it broadened its customer base to include general business and government agencies. Today, it also offers data for volunteer and job-applicant screening and data to assist in the location of missing children. ChoicePoint has over 4,000 employees, and its 2004 revenue was $918 million.
In the fall of 2004, ChoicePoint was the victim of a fraudulent spoofing attack in which unauthorized individuals posed as legitimate customers and obtained personal data on more than 145,000 individuals. According to the company''s Web site:
These criminals were able to pass our customer authentication due diligence processes by using stolen identities to create and produce the documents needed to appear legitimate. As small business customers of ChoicePoint, these fraudsters accessed products that contained basic telephone directory-type data (name and address information) as well as a combination of Social Security numbers and/or driver''s license numbers and, at times, abbreviated credit reports. They were also able to obtain other public record information including, but not limited to bankruptcies, liens, and judgments; professional licenses; and real property data.
ChoicePoint became aware of the problem in November 2004, when it noticed unusual processing activity on some accounts in Los Angeles. Accordingly, the company contacted the Los Angeles Police Department, which requested that ChoicePoint not reveal the activity until the department could conduct an investigation. In January, the LAPD notified ChoicePoint that it could contact the customers whose data had been compromised.
This crime is an example of a failure of authentication and not a network break-in. ChoicePoint''s firewalls and other safeguards were not overcome. Instead, the criminals spoofed legitimate businesses. The infiltrators obtained valid California business licenses, and until their unusual processing activity was detected, appeared to be legitimate users.
In response to this problem, ChoicePoint established a hotline for customers whose data were compromised to call for assistance. They also purchased a credit report for each of these people and paid for a one-year credit-report-monitoring service. In February 2005, attorneys initiated a class-action lawsuit for all 145,000 customers with an initial loss claim of $75,000 each. At the same time, the U.S. Senate announced that it would conduct an investigation.
Ironically, ChoicePoint exposed itself to a public relations nightmare, considerable expense, a class-action lawsuit, a Senate investigation, and a 20 percent drop in its share price because it contacted the police and cooperated in the attempt to apprehend the criminals. When ChoicePoint noticed the unusual account activity, had it simply shut down data access for the illegitimate businesses, no one would have known. Of course, the 145,000 customers whose identities had been compromised would have unknowingly been subject to identity theft, but it is unlikely that such thefts could have been tracked back to ChoicePoint.
Source: (accessed February 2005). Used with permission of
Questions to be used as homework assignment prior to the case discussion or as the basis for a case discussion in class:

Choice Point Case

1. Itemize the nature of the information security breach at ChoicePoint and how this adversely affected the organization. Be sure to include both tangible and intangible losses in preparing your response. [table]
2. What actions were taken by both ChoicePoint and the “authorities” to address the crisis, and what is your assessment of each action taken? [table]
3. What reactive steps by ChoicePoint might have mitigated their losses subsequent to their discovery of the information security breach? Explain/justify your choices. [table]
4. What proactive steps by ChoicePoint might deter a reoccurrence of such an information security breach? Explain/justify your choices. [table]

Posted Date: 6/19/2013 2:06:18 PM | Location : United States

Related Discussions:- The ChoicePoint Attack Case Study, Assignment Help, Ask Question on The ChoicePoint Attack Case Study, Get Answer, Expert's Help, The ChoicePoint Attack Case Study Discussions

Write discussion on The ChoicePoint Attack Case Study
Your posts are moderated
Related Questions
Question: (a) What is a prototype and describe how a prototype can help towards successful Information systems implementation? (b) Briefly describe the "water-fall model" o

Question: (a) Illustrate with the help of a diagram the three levels of an organisation and illustrate at which level the transaction processing system would operate. (b) A

MIS audit

Using the NCU library, do some research on the theory that you chose from the above list. Also, using your area of specialization, choose an area of interest and a common problem o

KWOC (Key Word-Out of Context) index   A KWOC index extracts the keyword from the title and the keyword is used as a separate heading with title and accession numbers listed be

Hello please could you assist ?

(a) What are the several information sources required for conceptual system design and how will you gather information from them ? (b) What will be the possible dominant and tra

The phrase called information overload may be a bit of a problem because it used so often, but the fact remain that managers & support staff are merged in information of all kinds.