Statutory provisions, Business Law and Ethics

Statutory Provisions:

 i) Definition of "Prospectus"

A prospectus is defined by S.2 as "any prospectus, notice, circular, advertisement or other invitation offering to the public for subscription or purchase any shares or debentures of a company" This particular definition was intended to prevent companies from evading the legal duties pertaining to the issue of a prospectus by issuing a prospectus under such name as "notice", "circular" or "advertisement". Whether a particular document is a prospectus will ultimately depend on the function it fulfills rather than the name given to it by its authors. Regarding the word "offering" in the definition it should be remembered that the issue of a prospectus by a company is not an offer as such but is a mere "invitation to treat". It is the application made in response to the prospectus that will constitute the "offer"

 ii) Dating of the prospectus

s.39 provides that a prospectus shall be dated. The date shall, unless the contrary is proved, be taken as the date on which the prospectus was issued to the public.

 iii) Contents of the prospectus

The authors of a prospectus are legally free to state therein whatever they deem appropriate to state but the contents must include, where applicable, the eighteen matters specified in Part I of the Third Schedule to the Act and the three reports specified in Part II of the said Schedule. Section 40(3) provides that, except as provided therein, it shall not be lawful for a company to issue any form of application for shares in or debentures of a company unless the form is issued with a prospectus which complies with the statutory requirements. However, a form of application for shares need not be issued with a prospectus if the form was issued either:-

i) There in connection with a bona fide invitation to a person to enter into an underwriting agreement with respect to the shares or debentures; or

ii) There in relation to shares or debentures which were not offered to the public; or

iii)  to existing members or debenture holders of the company (irrespective of whether the applicant had the right to renounce in favour of other persons); or

iv) in relation to shares or debentures which are or are to be in all respects uniform with shares or debenture previously issued.

Posted Date: 1/12/2013 3:04:24 AM | Location : United States







Related Discussions:- Statutory provisions, Assignment Help, Ask Question on Statutory provisions, Get Answer, Expert's Help, Statutory provisions Discussions

Write discussion on Statutory provisions
Your posts are moderated
Related Questions
Liability of Retiring Partner Whether unless there is a special agreement for the contrary like a retiring partner can be held liable no more in respect of debts incurred prev

Warranties - Terms of a Contract However there is no precise legal definition of such "warranty" that in legal nomenclature, where is susceptible for a variety of interpretati

Legal Profession - Judges However in general speaking that judges of the High Court of Kenya are appointed from among advocates of in case of seven years' standing as like i.e

Normal 0 false false false EN-IN X-NONE X-NONE MicrosoftInternetExplorer4

I am an international Law student. am taking International Financial Institutions I wrote a paper about the Europe Crisis I would like to find a lawyer or a tutor that can review a

Ratification - Law of Agency and Partnership However this is the adoption or confirmation through a person of a contract previously entered in through another.  Well

Explain the right of self determination The right of self determination amounts to an exception in the sense that when fighting for self determination, the state can render as

State Article 29 of international law Article 29 states that a member of a diplomatic mission enjoys immunity from arrest or prosecution.

QUESTION 1 Corruption is the cancer eating at the heart of good governance of public institutions. Discuss QUESTION 2 The Prevention of Corruption Act 2002 is dangerous

What is the difference between the plain meaning and the liberal approaches to the interpretation of contracts? Provide me with an example of each to show me you understand the dif