Sale of goods, Business Law and Ethics

Sale of Goods

However in US Law relating to the sale and purchase of goods is such contained in the Sale of Goods Act like cap 31. Therefore the Act is a reproduction of Goods Act 1893 of the English Sale that was made part of the US Law through the colonial administration in the US on date 1st October 1931.

Explanation

Further section 3 (1) of the Act defines a sale of goods like "a contract where through the seller transfers may agrees to transfer the property in such goods to the buyer to a money consideration recognised the price".

Fundamentals of the defination

Although the legal consequences of the above definition are: like;

(a) Whether a sale of goods is "a contract". With Part II of the Act bears the heading "formation about the contract" there is nothing in it such regulates the actual formation of the contract of sale of goods. Conversely it appears reasonable to assume such the contract envisaged through the Act is to be formed according for the rules such govern the formation of contracts in like general, as namely, and like the rules of the common law. Subsequently before a sale of goods be capable of take place: like;

(i)There must be an offer for buy, may sell, tagging on a corresponding acceptance there.

(ii)All the other conditions prescribed through the common law to the validity of a contract be required to be met. Therefore by s.6 provides such a contract regards the sale of goods worth two hundred shillings may as more have to be entered in, otherwise evidenced, and may like in writing, or else the contract is unenforceable also.

(b) The contract effects a transfer like; "the property in such the goods" delineated through it to the buyer there.

(i)The transfer is immediate then the contract constitutes "a sale".

(ii)Although the transfer is delayed then the contract constitutes "an agreement for sell."

Hence "The property in goods" in this context because "the ownership of the goods" like sold or agreed for be sold. Further in effect what like the buyer pay to, is not the physical goods although the right to own them. So then he has acquired the ownership that he will be in a position for do anything he pleases-further frequently taking possession of them otherwise reselling them there.

(c) The consideration to the transfer of ownership must be there "a money consideration" there. Thus reason that a barter is not like "sale" of goods. So further it is an exchange of goods in view of the fact that never like "money" as cash else cheque is paid through either party.

Therefore in Aldridge v Johnson an agreement provided to the exchange of 52 bullocks by way of 100 quarters of barley so then the difference in their value being payable such in cash. Further it was held like the agreement constituted a sale of goods during the statutory definition. Further the money paid through the one party would be regarded like the "money consideration" with the goods delivered or to be delivered about the other party. Conversely the apparent inadequacy of the consideration is then legally irrelevant. Whether in any case the owner about the goods must be assumed for know what that he is doing there.

(d) However the provision that the property in the goods like; "transferred" because there must be two different parties for the contract. Subsequently a person cannot sell goods for himself-even though it appears probable such he can do so in two distinct capacities. Further even so there may like a sale during like a "part-owner" of the goods also.

Posted Date: 1/30/2013 8:04:57 AM | Location : United States







Related Discussions:- Sale of goods, Assignment Help, Ask Question on Sale of goods, Get Answer, Expert's Help, Sale of goods Discussions

Write discussion on Sale of goods
Your posts are moderated
Related Questions
Hire-Purchase and Sale The hire-purchase transaction is such not a sale since, according to the definition like: (i)There is no seller or buyer. Such like the parties are the

Criminal Appeal - District Magistrate's Court Therefore in Section 10(1) of the Magistrate's Courts Act gives that any person that who is convicted of an offence on the trial

Assignments should be submitted on or before the due date. Zero mark will follow late submission of an assignment unless you have an acceptable reason approved by the instructor.

Reduction of Capital:   4.1 The general rule is that it is illegal for a company to reduce its capital. This is so because such a reduction would be tantamount to reducing

Acceptance - Law of Contract Conversely an offer made to the general public can be established through anybody who fulfil that performs then the conditions stated therein.

Accuracy of the managers certificate: Was it the duty of the auditors to test the accuracy of the manager's certificate by a comparison of the figures in the books, and were t

Fitness for Purpose - Sales of Goods However that goods such are bought for a particular purpose that are reasonably fit about that purpose:(S.16 (a))like Whether this conditi

Explain Self determination Self determination is actually the foundation of United Nations (UN) Charter. It is defined as a right of people to determine and to choose their ow

Explain the Law of the Sea Convention 1982 The Law of the Sea Convention 1982 did not create a new area of law, as laws governing the sea date back to the dawn of maritime his

Group Accounts: Section 150 requires a company which has subsidiaries to lay before the company in general meeting accounts or  statements dealing with the state of affairs an