Risk breakdown structure (rbs) , Project Management

Risk Breakdown Structure (RBS) 

Risk Breakdown Structure (RBS) is a tool developed by Dr. David Hillson that is used to guide the risk management process. He describes RBS as "A Source-oriented grouping of project risks that organise and defines the total risk exposure of the project. Each descending level represents an increasingly detailed definition of sources of risk to the project." (Introduction to IT project management By Cynthia Snyder, Frank Parth).

The Risk Breakdown Structure (RBS) helps a project manager and the risk manager to structure the risks being identified. RBS is considered as the "hierarchically organized depiction of the identified project risks arranged by risk category." The risk data can be arranged in an organised and structured manner to provide standard presentation of the risk data, which help in better understanding, communication and management. 

Problem related to the structuring of project risk can be solved by using hierarchical approach with levels that are required to provide essential understanding of tracked risks for effective  risk management. This hierarchical structure of potential risk sources is known as a Risk Breakdown Structure (RBS). The RBS arranges the risk items into labelled rows and columns within a table called Matrix. This Risk Matrix is considered as tool used to determine the severity of the risk of an event. 

Risk Breakdown Structure (RBS) has proven to be the most useful method when compared to other methods such as listing and tracking risks in the spread-sheets. RBS helps you to have a better knowledge on addressed risks which in turn helps you to get into the depth of each risk. 

The Table 2.2 shows an example of how the risks are broken down into a matrix structure: 

Table 2.2: Matrix Structure   

1466_matrix structure.png

After arranging the tracked risk items in table as matrix form, the company then computes the levels of risk to take with different events. For example, you may face any kind of risks such as having a crane dropped on you, or hit by a car, or the risk of being caught in a stampede. Each risk has probability and a consequence. Probability of being hit by car is more when compared to the risk of being caught in a stampede. However, the consequence of the risk of being caught in a stampede is more terrifying than the risk of being hit by a car. The below Table 2.3 shows the possible risks with their probability and consequence: 

Table 2.3: Risk Probability and Consequence  

1402_matrix structure1.png

Posted Date: 9/24/2012 8:41:07 AM | Location : United States







Related Discussions:- Risk breakdown structure (rbs) , Assignment Help, Ask Question on Risk breakdown structure (rbs) , Get Answer, Expert's Help, Risk breakdown structure (rbs) Discussions

Write discussion on Risk breakdown structure (rbs)
Your posts are moderated
Related Questions
What is productivity? Productivity: Productivity may be described as the ratio between input and output. Output implies the amount produced or the number of items produce

What have RAD and extreme programming got in common? What are the claimed advantages of these approaches? Both XP and RAD have as their common intention, and when their primary

I have been in chemo after surgery, and have missed quite a bit of Project Risk Management. I was wondering if you guys are able to complete a few assignments that could catch me

Question: (a) An internal audit program (or schedule ) is prepared taking into consideration ‘the status and importance of the various processes and areas.' With reference to

Are the principal advantages and disadvantages of the sequential approach to system development offered through the waterfall and ‘V’ lifecycle models? The waterfall approach a

Problem: According to the PRB report, "Performance management is often confused with performance appraisal or the confidential reporting system presently in force in the servi

Factor Affecting Process Planning Size and form of Raw Materials: Process planning actually starts with the blank selection. The blank or initial raw material may be ava

Chapter 6 presents several tools that can be useful when assessing for project uncertainties. Compare and contrast risk mapping, FMEA, and the gut-feeling method. Which method do y

Program planning  An effective and disciplined planning of a project is directly related to customer satisfaction. Since customer expectations always include timely delivery as