Receivables management, Financial Management

Receivables Management

The decision on whether to grant or not to grant credit to a particular customer can be taken if certain subjective probabilities of the payment pattern of the customer can be specified based on an analysis of the customer's financial viability, the nature of profession or employment or business he is engaged in, his relationship with other suppliers, his past record of payments to other suppliers, etc. has been carried out. The decision to grant credit or not to grant credit is usually based on expected value calculations.

Example 

A textile manufacturer must decide whether a credit of Rs.30 lakh can be extended to a new customer who manufactures dresses. The customer is expected to make a repeat purchase. The textile manufacturer on credit evaluation of the customer feels that the probability that the customer will pay is 0.85 and the probability that the customer will default is 0.15. If the customer pays for the first purchase, the probability that he will pay for the repeat purchase would increase to 0.95. The repeat purchase is also expected to be worth Rs.30 lakh. The cost of sales for both orders is 80 percent of sales value. Should the textile manufacturer grant credit?

The possibilities when credit is granted for the first order are as follows:

  1. The customer defaults and no repeat purchase is allowed.

  2. The customer pays and places a repeat purchase order.

The outcome of the repeat order could be that the customer pays or does not pay.

In the example, at the first decision node we have two choices: to allow credit or not to allow credit. If credit is allowed on the first order, the subsequent events are the customer will pay with a probability of 0.85 or he will not pay with a probability of 0.15. If the customer pays then at the second decision node he is expected to make a repeat purchase. The subsequent events on allowing credit for the second order are that the customer will pay with a probability of 0.95 or not pay with a probability of 0.05.

We can draw the following decision tree:

Figure 

663_recievables management.png

Evaluating expected pay-offs from right to left,

At node D2:

Decision - Go for 2nd order

 

prob.

x

pay-off

=

Exp. pay-off

Event: customer will pay

0.85

x

(6 + 4.5)

=

8.925

Event: customer will not pay

(+)0.15

x

0.8*(-)30

=

(-)3.6

 

Net Expected Pay-off

=

5.325

Therefore, by going for the 2nd order the net expected pay-off is Rs.4.5 lakh.

At node D1:

Decision - Allow Credit and go for 1st order

 

prob.

x

pay-off

=

Exp. pay-off


Event: customer will pay

0.85

x

(6 + 4.5)

=

8.925

Event: customer will not pay

(+)0.15

x

0.8*(-)30

=

(-)3.6

 

Net Expected Pay-off

=

5.325

* (Note that for the event, customer will pay, we consider the total expected pay-off i.e. 6 + 4.5. This is because if the customer pays for the 1st order he will make a profit of Rs.6 lakh on the 1st order as well as make a net expected pay-off of Rs.4.5 lakh on the 2nd order which takes place as a result of the customer paying for the 1st order.)

Decision - Do not allow credit

Here the pay-off is 0.

We find that if the decision of allowing credit is followed then a net expected pay-off of Rs.5.325 lakh can be made as opposed to no pay-off by not allowing credit. Hence the decision of allowing credit is followed.

Posted Date: 9/15/2012 2:41:32 AM | Location : United States







Related Discussions:- Receivables management, Assignment Help, Ask Question on Receivables management, Get Answer, Expert's Help, Receivables management Discussions

Write discussion on Receivables management
Your posts are moderated
Related Questions
Q. Explain about Discount Rate? Discount Rate - Rate at which INTEREST is deducted in advance of the issuance, selling, purchasing or lending of a financial instrument. Also, t

Joe and Sam each invested $20,000 in the stock market. Joe's investment increased in value by 5% per year for 10 years. Sam's investment decreased in value by 5% for 5 years and th

Q. Conservative Approach of Financial Management? An exact matching plan may not be followed in practice. A firm may adopt a conservative approach in financing its current and


Factors Affecting cost of capital are elements in the business environment that cause a company cost of capital to be high and low. Figure below illustrative the various primary fa

Inflation in International Markets In 1983, Gultekin tried to find out the relation between stock return and the inflation rates (expected/unexpected). He accomplished this by

On-the-run treasury issues are the most recently auctioned issues of a given maturity. They include Treasury bills of 3-month, 6-month and 1-year maturity;  treas

Q. Final stage of career? The final stage in one's career is difficult for everyone but is it hardest for those who have had continued successes in the earlier stages. After se

Is it possible to make money in the stock market when the quotations are going down? What is credit sale? There are three simple moves to make money when prices are going down:

Advantages of ARR: It is simple to calculate and easy to catch. With the help of this technique, direct comparisons among proposed projected of varying lives with no bu