Reading for the literature review, HR Management

There is, potentially, a great deal of material to get through in undertaking the reading for the literature review. Some of it may be quite difficult - coming to grips with complex concepts and detailed research reports.

It is important, therefore, that you approach reading in a way which makes it most effective from day one. This is a skill which, the more you practise, the better and faster you can become.

At the heart of the skill is knowing how to approach reading a particular source. You do not need to read everything. You do, though, need to study in some depth material that is relevant to your particular needs. There are a number of elements to this.

• Be clear about the focus of the review.

• Get an overview of the publication, for example by reading the contents page, the introduction and the conclusion.

• Having identified the relevance of a publication and which parts you need to study, "skim-read" them. This is rapid reading, aiming to get a general impression of the material before starting to study it in depth. It is actually easier to follow arguments if we keep going reasonably quickly through the material, than to slow down and try to understand each separate sentence or phrase in detail. In practice, it is better to read something through twice, rather than to read it once at half the speed.

• In-depth reading may be either receptive or reflective. In receptive mode, you are reading quickly and in a relaxed way - aiming to get a good feel for the subject and listening to what the author has to say. In reflective mode, you are working more slowly - analysing, comparing and evaluating the content. Give yourself time to do this properly. You need to reflect and consider the material after your initial reading, and probably then to re-read it with specific questions in mind.

• Remember your overall focus when reading in this way. It is useful to think of questions about the material - how will it assist your understanding, how does it relate to other material, what approach is adopted to particular themes, etc. In particular, question the material to help you frame your research issue or problem, so that you are constantly tightening its definition and, thus, focusing on the key aspects for your research.

• Make notes - this is the key to effective understanding as well as providing the basis for recall at a later stage. We shall consider note taking in more detail below.

• Review the material once more when you have finished the in-depth reading and note taking. Scan the content to ensure that you have an accurate overall understanding of what the author is putting across.

Posted Date: 2/20/2013 5:03:09 AM | Location : United States







Related Discussions:- Reading for the literature review, Assignment Help, Ask Question on Reading for the literature review, Get Answer, Expert's Help, Reading for the literature review Discussions

Write discussion on Reading for the literature review
Your posts are moderated
Related Questions
Difference between personnel management and human resource management

To counter the challenges associated with diversity in teams, Leonard - Barton (1995) uses the term creative abrasion to describe the process of involving a variety of people with

Pilgrim Industries, a 2,000-employee firm with 400 managers, holds 40 of off-site meetings per year. Outside consultants develop and conduct the meetings, and, on average, 20 manag

emerging performance management management topics

Question 1: The right to join and to participate in the activities of a trade union is a right conferred upon every employee who has chosen to be a member of a trade union. In

Q. Sectoral level of training needs? Sectoral level: the definition of sect oral needs may be quite meaningful if a sect oral development policy or plan is being considered or

Question 1: Organizations today face a dynamic and changing environment to which they have to adapt in order to be successful. (a) What are the forces which act as stimulan

Richness versus Reach Another perspective that accelerated the enthusiasm for KM and the development of knowledge products is the 'richness versus reach' thesis of Evans and Wu

advantage and disadvantage of external recruitment

Q. Enhancing quality and productivity of human resource development system ? Enhancing quality and productivity: to evolve the human resource development system so that the emp