Purpose of the rule - statutory provisions, Business Law and Ethics

Purpose of the rule:

It has been stated by various English judges that without the rule in Foss v Harbottle

(i)            There would be futile actions.

 A court order made on an application by an aggrieved minority of members (such as the two members of the Victoria Park Co.) would be made redundant by a resolution passed later on at the company's meeting confirming or ratifying what the minority had complained of in court.

 (ii) There is a likelihood of multiplicity of suits if each and every shareholder were to institute proceedings without any co-ordination with the others.

 (iii) The principle of corporate personality enunciated in Salomon v Salomon and Co. Ltd would be undermined.  Since a company is a separate legal person it is the company that has suffered a wrong but not its members.

(iv) The principle of majority rule would be violated.

 The law views companies as democracies of the majority shareholders. On the other hand whereas the thing complained of is a thing which in substance the majority of the company are entitled to do, or whether something has been done irregularly that the majority of the company are entitled to do regularly, or whether something has been done illegally that the majority of the company are entitled to do legally, there can be no utilize in having litigation about it, the ultimate end of that is only like a meeting has to be recognized, and then ultimately the majority gets its wishes" (per Mellish, L.J. in MacDougall v Gardiner).

Posted Date: 1/15/2013 2:59:13 AM | Location : United States







Related Discussions:- Purpose of the rule - statutory provisions, Assignment Help, Ask Question on Purpose of the rule - statutory provisions, Get Answer, Expert's Help, Purpose of the rule - statutory provisions Discussions

Write discussion on Purpose of the rule - statutory provisions
Your posts are moderated
Related Questions
Power to dispense with the word "Limited":                             Although s.5 provides that the last word of the name of a limited company must be "limited" this would n

# difference between variation of class right and variation of enjoyment

Words are imprecise. Interpretation of words and the passages in which they are contained is a difficult task, but one nonetheless that is required when Courts are asked to apply t

Why International law is very different from domestic law International law is very different from domestic law because in domestic disputes there are Courts to adjudicate upon

State in brief aboput the Monetary Effects Besides real income effects there will also be monetary effects if nations seek to intervene in foreign exchange markets which govern

Invitation to Treat - Law of Contract Well this is a mere invitation through a party to another or others to make offers.  Another time the offeror become offeree and invitee

Disadvantages of Arbitration First is, Arbitral awards have no precedential value as that they cannot be relied on in subsequent proceedings Second is, Arbitrati

Mrs. Rusholme occupied the firm of Saunders and Watts to refinish floors in assured rooms of a home owned by her and her husband in Red Deer, Alberta. She told Mr. Saunders that sh

Q. Suggested actions for addressing phoenix activity? The following actions are suggested for addressing phoenix activity. Those that have been suggested are the actions that:

Appropriate method adopted is to make new laws The more appropriate method adopted is to make new laws in compliance with the international laws because it would not only help