Purpose of the rule - statutory provisions, Business Law and Ethics

Purpose of the rule:

It has been stated by various English judges that without the rule in Foss v Harbottle

(i)            There would be futile actions.

 A court order made on an application by an aggrieved minority of members (such as the two members of the Victoria Park Co.) would be made redundant by a resolution passed later on at the company's meeting confirming or ratifying what the minority had complained of in court.

 (ii) There is a likelihood of multiplicity of suits if each and every shareholder were to institute proceedings without any co-ordination with the others.

 (iii) The principle of corporate personality enunciated in Salomon v Salomon and Co. Ltd would be undermined.  Since a company is a separate legal person it is the company that has suffered a wrong but not its members.

(iv) The principle of majority rule would be violated.

 The law views companies as democracies of the majority shareholders. On the other hand whereas the thing complained of is a thing which in substance the majority of the company are entitled to do, or whether something has been done irregularly that the majority of the company are entitled to do regularly, or whether something has been done illegally that the majority of the company are entitled to do legally, there can be no utilize in having litigation about it, the ultimate end of that is only like a meeting has to be recognized, and then ultimately the majority gets its wishes" (per Mellish, L.J. in MacDougall v Gardiner).

Posted Date: 1/15/2013 2:59:13 AM | Location : United States







Related Discussions:- Purpose of the rule - statutory provisions, Assignment Help, Ask Question on Purpose of the rule - statutory provisions, Get Answer, Expert's Help, Purpose of the rule - statutory provisions Discussions

Write discussion on Purpose of the rule - statutory provisions
Your posts are moderated
Related Questions
3 ways in which the restaurant can engage in socially responsive activities in the community within which it operates.

Order for compulsory liquidation: The Official Receiver also calls separate meetings of creditors and of contributories within one month of the order for liquidation: s.236.

CONDITIONS FOR RELIEF: In H.R. Harmer Ltd (1959) Jenkins L.J. summarised the conditions which must be met before relief under the section can be granted by the court when he s

Undischarged Bankrupts: S.188 provides that if an undischarged bankrupt acts as director of any company without leave of the court he shall be liable to imprisonment for a ter

Issuing shares at a discount: In Ooregum Gold Mining Co of India Ltd v Roper (45) the House of Lords held that it is illegal for a limited company to issue its shares at a dis

Nemo Dat Quod Non Habet - Goods Therefore another common law maxim such applies to sale of goods is like "nemo dat quod non habet": whether a person cannot give such he does

QUESTION 1 (a) List down the remedies that are available for breach of contract (b) Elaborate on two of them QUESTION 2 What are the duties of seller and buyer under

Legal Procedures: The court may order the examination in private or public (ie. open court) of an officer of a company in liquidation or of any person known or suspected to ha

Mr. D is a professional basketball player who orders some shoes through the mail. The mail order house promises all customers delivery within 30 days of receiving the order. Mr. D'

Ostensible Authority - Authority of Partners A difference is something drawn among the genuine and ostensible authority about a partner. Whether it is actual or express author