Proposal to reduce the votes of preference shares, Business Law and Ethics

Proposal to reduce the votes of preference shares:

In making this approach the courts have nonetheless kept the door open for action to deal with discrimination against a class by indirect means.  In the Bristol Aeroplane Case it was said (as an obiter dictum) that if the ordinary shareholders had passed a resolution simply to double the votes attached to the ordinary shares this would have been a variation of the voting rights of preference shares (to which the safeguards described above would apply).

A class of shares may carry different rights in one respect (e.g. a preference dividend) but the same rights as other classes in other respects.  Because of the difference it ranks as a class to which the safeguards apply.  This is so even when the class right to be varied is shared with the other class.  Suppose, for example, the articles give one vote per share to both ordinary and preference shares.  A proposal to reduce the votes of preference shares to, say, 1 vote for 10 preference shares is a variation of a class right since it is enjoyed by that class (and also by the ordinary shareholders).

S.74(4) provides that the decision of the court on any application shall be final.  the company must deliver a certified copy of the court order to the registrar within thirty days after the making of the order.

Posted Date: 1/15/2013 3:11:36 AM | Location : United States







Related Discussions:- Proposal to reduce the votes of preference shares, Assignment Help, Ask Question on Proposal to reduce the votes of preference shares, Get Answer, Expert's Help, Proposal to reduce the votes of preference shares Discussions

Write discussion on Proposal to reduce the votes of preference shares
Your posts are moderated
Related Questions
Laws relating to air and outer space as follows: Article 1 states that the contracting states should recognize that every state has complete and exclusive sovereignty over the

QUESTION 1 Discuss the sources of the Mauritian law QUESTION 2 (a) Tom, Pim and Pam enter into a lease agreement. The agreement has already been signed by Pim and Pam.

Contractual Capacity of Drunken Persons Whether a person purported to enter with a contract at a time at what time he was too drunk to understand then what he was doing and th

Personal rights invaded:                    A shareholder may sue to protect from invasion their own individual rights as members.  This is illustrated by Pender v Lushington

QUESTION 1 (a) According to Thomas Dye "Public Policy is whatever governments choose to do or not to do". How far do you agree? (b) Explain clearly how the first important s

Compulsory winding up: At the hearing other creditors of the company may oppose the petition.  If so, the court is likely to decide in favour of those to whom the larger amoun

Variation of class rights of the preference shareholders: This was not a variation of class rights of the preference shareholders.  The company could resolve to go keen on liq

What is Policy Clustering Adoption of policies is motivated by the observation that nation-states, or some other jurisdictional unit, choose similar institutions within a fairl

QUESTION 1 Outline the procedure and criteria for the granting of recognition of representational status and recognition of negotiating rights QUESTION 2 (a) What do yo

Unity and continuity of domicile Conversely S.10 of the Act provides such no person may have more than one domicile at any one time and no person shall be deemed for be witho