Property as control over access, Other Subject

Property as Control over Access

And so continues our search for the inner mystery of "property". Let us look back and see how far we have got since we started. There is no real likelihood that we have arrived at our destination, for the quest for the essential nature of "property" has beguiled thinkers for many centuries. The essence of "property" is indeed elusive. That is why, in a sense, we have tried to catch the concept by surprise by asking not "What is property?" but rather "What is not property?" We have started from the other end of the earth- both geographically and conceptually-and we have deliberately come by the direction which seemed least probable. But along the way we may have discovered something of value. We may have discovered the irreducible conditions which underlie any claim of "property".

The classic common law criteria of "property" have tended to rest a twin emphasis onĀ  the assignability of the benefits inherent in a resource and on the relative permanence of those benefits if unassigned. Before a right can be admitted within the category of "property" it must, according to Lord Wilberforce in National Provincial Bank Ltd. v. Ainsworth, be "definable, identifiable by third parties, capable in its nature of assumption by third parties, and have some degree of permanence or stability". This preoccupation with assignability of benefit and enforceability of burden doubtless owes much to the fact that the formative phases of the common law concept of property coincided with a remarkable culture of bargain and exchange. Non-transferable rights or rights which failed on transfer were simply not "property". Within the crucible of transfer lawyers affected to demarcate rights of "property" from rights founded in contract and tort or, for that matter, from human rights and civil liberties. Only brief reflection is required in order to perceive the horrible circularity of such hallmarks of "property". If naively we ask which rights are proprietary, we are told that they are those rights which are assignable to and enforceable against third parties. When we then ask which rights these may be, we are told that they comprise, of course, the rights which are traditionally identified as "proprietary". "Property" is "property" because it is "property": property status and proprietary consequence confuse each other in a deadening embrace of cause and effect.

Posted Date: 2/21/2013 6:21:32 AM | Location : United States







Related Discussions:- Property as control over access, Assignment Help, Ask Question on Property as control over access, Get Answer, Expert's Help, Property as control over access Discussions

Write discussion on Property as control over access
Your posts are moderated
Related Questions
Culture: Culture refers to the knowledge; ways of thinking, feeling and behaving that give each society its coherence and its distinctive way of life. Culture is demonstrated b

Question: The experience of growing old will bring with it many emotional and social traumas. These will be lived differently by those concerned and in some cases will need cou

Question: (a) I) Describe career development and illustrate why we need to study related theories? II) Define decision making and explain how this relates to career counse

role of school ,parents and peers imparting family life education

Problem 1: i. Distinguish between Commercial and Institutional Catering. ii. How are cost factors treated in Commercial and Institutional Catering? iii. What kind of Food

what is law?

how to design a website for a college or university?


select one single task of hr activities and coordinate, motivate and develop the hr employees of your organization by using IS

How to Product on Aeroplane