Property as control over access, Other Subject

Property as Control over Access

And so continues our search for the inner mystery of "property". Let us look back and see how far we have got since we started. There is no real likelihood that we have arrived at our destination, for the quest for the essential nature of "property" has beguiled thinkers for many centuries. The essence of "property" is indeed elusive. That is why, in a sense, we have tried to catch the concept by surprise by asking not "What is property?" but rather "What is not property?" We have started from the other end of the earth- both geographically and conceptually-and we have deliberately come by the direction which seemed least probable. But along the way we may have discovered something of value. We may have discovered the irreducible conditions which underlie any claim of "property".

The classic common law criteria of "property" have tended to rest a twin emphasis onĀ  the assignability of the benefits inherent in a resource and on the relative permanence of those benefits if unassigned. Before a right can be admitted within the category of "property" it must, according to Lord Wilberforce in National Provincial Bank Ltd. v. Ainsworth, be "definable, identifiable by third parties, capable in its nature of assumption by third parties, and have some degree of permanence or stability". This preoccupation with assignability of benefit and enforceability of burden doubtless owes much to the fact that the formative phases of the common law concept of property coincided with a remarkable culture of bargain and exchange. Non-transferable rights or rights which failed on transfer were simply not "property". Within the crucible of transfer lawyers affected to demarcate rights of "property" from rights founded in contract and tort or, for that matter, from human rights and civil liberties. Only brief reflection is required in order to perceive the horrible circularity of such hallmarks of "property". If naively we ask which rights are proprietary, we are told that they are those rights which are assignable to and enforceable against third parties. When we then ask which rights these may be, we are told that they comprise, of course, the rights which are traditionally identified as "proprietary". "Property" is "property" because it is "property": property status and proprietary consequence confuse each other in a deadening embrace of cause and effect.

Posted Date: 2/21/2013 6:21:32 AM | Location : United States







Related Discussions:- Property as control over access, Assignment Help, Ask Question on Property as control over access, Get Answer, Expert's Help, Property as control over access Discussions

Write discussion on Property as control over access
Your posts are moderated
Related Questions
factors will you keep in mind while planning for a library building

Gender behaviour management in secondary school

Cargo Management: Project Name : Cargo Management Role : Managing & Leading the Team. Involved in Gathering, Estimation, System Design, Database Design. Documentation

Public Key Cryptography Today's asymmetric or public key cryptography systems are a significant development over conventional symmetric cryptography systems in that they permit

which syllabus should read for IAS pre and main


how do I get better at writing?

COMMERCIAL ENVIRONMENT The commercial environment team is made up of four main fundamentals: health & safety, food, entertainment premises, and the consultation team. They make

when does the earth rotates though 360 degrees of longitude

Could i get some help with a normalization exercise? I don''t have much experience and i have to put it into 1NF, 2NF, and 3NF