Proceedings at meetings - held, Business Law and Ethics

Proceedings at meetings - Held:

Held: The resolution as passed was invalid since it was not the special resolution of which notice had been given.  Even the retention of 321 pounds out of 1.4m pounds is a change of substance.

(b)  If the chairman wrongly rejects an amendment and the resolution is carried in its original form it is invalid.  If he allows the amendment to be discussed it should be put to the vote before the original resolution.  If the amendment is carried the resolution as amended is then put to the vote.

(c) The rights of members to vote and the number of votes to which they are entitled in respect of their shares are fixed by the articles.  One vote per share is normal but some shares, eg. preference shares, may carry no voting rights in normal circumstances.  To shorten the proceedings at meetings the procedure is:

 i. on putting a resolution to the vote the chairman calls for a show of hands, ie. one vote may be given by each member present in person: proxies do not vote.  The chairman declares the result.  Unless a poll is then demanded, the chairman's declaration (duly recorded in the minutes) is conclusive.  No one can re-count hands after the meeting (but see para 35 below).

 ii. If a real test of voting strength is required a poll may be demanded.  The result of the previous show of hands is then disregarded.  On a poll every member and also proxies representing absent members may cast the full number of votes to which they are entitled.  A poll need not be held forthwith but may be postponed so that arrangements to hold it can be made.

Although the chairman's declaration of the result of a vote on a show of hands is made "conclusive" (by the articles {Table A Art 58} and by CA s.141(2) as regards special resolutions) unless a poll is demanded, this is not as absolute and final a decision as the word "conclusive" suggests.  It prevents subsequent argument about the count of hands raised on a show of hands.  But it is still possible to challenge the chairman's declaration on the ground that it was fraudulent or manifestly wrong.

Posted Date: 1/12/2013 5:47:22 AM | Location : United States







Related Discussions:- Proceedings at meetings - held, Assignment Help, Ask Question on Proceedings at meetings - held, Get Answer, Expert's Help, Proceedings at meetings - held Discussions

Write discussion on Proceedings at meetings - held
Your posts are moderated
Related Questions
Normal 0 false false false EN-IN X-NONE X-NONE MicrosoftInternetExplorer4 Who are refugees

Payee - Negotiable Instruments Some the payee like: (i) Section 7(1) gives such where a bill is not payable for the bearer, such the payee must be named otherwise indicated

Question 1: a) Explain the four principles of effective financial regulations. b) Describe briefly the various regulatory tools used to achieve objectives of financ

Question 1: How does Kelsen distinguish between the act of a gang of robbers and the act of a tax authority? Question 2: Referring to legal theorists you have studied,

Duties or Obligations of Hirer However these are not provided in the Act although are usually found in such the agreement itself Like: a) Take delivery: whether upon ente

The Laws of Contract DSL Limited decide to buy a ferry on operate it between CMI and Downtown, Kingston. They did not have enough money to buy the vessel, so they borrow some from

A is large property developer who is listed on the Kuala Lumpur Stock Exchange. B is a building contractor. A employed B in 2008 to build a large office complex comprising 3 towers

Partnership Law However section 3(1) of the Partnership Act characterize like partnership; such; Therefore "The relation that subsists between persons carrying at a busines

Article 1 - State Responsibility The laws on state responsibility are derived from state practices and various other customs and practices. However the main text on the law of

What are the main areas of case law? Case law: There are two main areas, as follows: • Common law: It is an amalgamation of past cases that are used to make decision