Procedures in evaluating the work of expert, Auditing

Procedures in Evaluating the Work of Expert

The auditor must get reasonable assurance which the expert's work constitutes suitable audit evidence in based of the financial information.  Therefore he must consider the source data utilized and whether it is suitable in the circumstances, the method used and the assumptions and their consistency along with prior duration and the results of the expert's work in the light of the auditor's overall knowledge of the results and business of his other audit process.  So he should satisfy himself which the substance of the expert's finding is appropriately reflected in the financial information.  How reasonable and suitable the assumptions and methods utilized are and how they have been applied that is the expert's responsibility. 

Such the auditor does not have the similar expertise so he cannot forever challenge the expert's assumptions and methods.  Although the auditor is not an expert on the expert's field of specialist, the auditor must be able to determine what is reasonable and what is not.  Therefore he must obtain an understanding of the assumptions and the methods to determine that they are reasonable.  There are times when the work of the expert does not support the related representations in the financial statements then the auditor should attempt to resolve the inconsistency by holding discussions with the client and the expert.  He may need to engage another expert in resolving the inconsistency.

Posted Date: 1/24/2013 7:38:22 AM | Location : United States

Related Discussions:- Procedures in evaluating the work of expert, Assignment Help, Ask Question on Procedures in evaluating the work of expert, Get Answer, Expert's Help, Procedures in evaluating the work of expert Discussions

Write discussion on Procedures in evaluating the work of expert
Your posts are moderated
Related Questions

How do internal auditors add to the credibility of financial statements?

Assertions about disclosure Assertions about disclosure and presentation : a) Rights and Occurrence and obligations -disclosed transactions and events and other issues

Question 1: "While their roles sometimes overlap, financial statement auditors and forensic accounting investigators tackle financial fraud issues from different perspectives,

Reporting to the members Except the faults and irregularities outcome in the accounts not giving an accurate and fair view, or do not conform to statute, or appropriate books h

Existence of Debtors - Audit Process The easiest technique to establish the existence of a debtor is to enquire the debtor if he exists. This is done through use of a practice

Length: 2000 words Submission method options Alternative submission method Task Question 1 (5%) Case: Battersby and Associates Chartered Accountants is a successful mid-tier ac

Wal-Mart Locate the 2009 Form 10-K for Wal-Mart in Appendix A and consider the following questions: 1. With respect to the report of the external auditors to "the Board of Directo

Fleet Bhd operates a chain of high street retail outlets selling clothing and household items. In 1995, this company was heading for a financial loss and was deemed to have lost st