Procedures followed in conducting an audit, Auditing

Procedures followed in Conducting an Audit

Procedures generally followed in conducting an audit by more than one firm of accountants and the division of work between them.

All auditors may be liable to the consequences of loss arising from negligence.  Each joint auditor accepts all the obligations of the office of auditor and this can mean that losses flowing from a wrong auditor's report may be recovered from either of both auditors.  Thus a joint auditor might be financially responsible for losses arising as a consequence of the negligence or incompetence of his fellow auditor.

Before accepting a joint office, an auditor must:

1. Consider whether he is prepared to serve jointly with the other auditor.  He may well ask himself if he would take him as a partner.

2. Assure him that adequate review and control of all aspects of the audit can be prepared.

3. Ensure such professional indemnity insurance cover can be acquiring to cover the individual situation.

Several possible arrangements could be made:

1. Each joint auditor could conduct its own audit with its own standard documentation and files.  Leading schedules would need to be photocopied and exchanged.

2. A unified set of documents and files could be produced by both firms.  This may involve some modification of each firm's methods.

3. Each firm could use one standard set of documents and files using the standards of the larger of the two firms.

Whatever the techniques is used, extensive conversation and planning must lead the commencement of any audit work.

The considerations that are likely to dictate the division of work are as:

i.     Expertise: Each firm may have individual expertise as in specific kinds of client, computers etc.

ii.    Geography: The particular place of the firms and their branches must be believed.

iii.   Competence: One of the joint auditors may be particularly competent along with small clients, the other along with large clients.

iv.   Availability and Size of staff.

v.    Cost: Audit costs may be minimised through a particular division of work.

 

Posted Date: 1/28/2013 5:27:43 AM | Location : United States







Related Discussions:- Procedures followed in conducting an audit, Assignment Help, Ask Question on Procedures followed in conducting an audit, Get Answer, Expert's Help, Procedures followed in conducting an audit Discussions

Write discussion on Procedures followed in conducting an audit
Your posts are moderated
Related Questions
Sufficiency of audit evidence The audit evidence should in total enable the auditor to form an opinion on the financial statements. Sufficiency is a measurement of the quantity

Cost and Authorization - Auditing Process The cost of building and land acquired while the year should be vouched to suitable documentation.These are contract of sale, surveyo


You are the partner in charge of the audit of Drugs4U Ltd, a company which develops, manufactures and sells to the a trade market a wide range of drugs which promote healthy living

Management Representations as a Source of Audit Evidence International Standard on Auditing as abbreviated ISA 580 Management Representations gives guidance and standards on t

Audit of Group Accounts The main problems can be split into three sections in this area as: 1. The audit of the holding company confirming and obtaining information concern

Auditing appears to be a worse of time considering financial fraud cases in Zimbabwe and world over. Justify the existence of the audit profession and what to be done to improve it

Q. Which of the following statements is not considered a disadvantage of the corporate form of organization? a. Additional taxes b. Government regulations c. Limited liability of s

An auditor is conducting an audit of the financial statements of a wholesale cosmetics distributor with an inventory consisting of thousands of individual items. The distributor ke

discuss the verification procedure of current assets and long term liabilties