Procedures followed in conducting an audit, Auditing

Procedures followed in Conducting an Audit

Procedures generally followed in conducting an audit by more than one firm of accountants and the division of work between them.

All auditors may be liable to the consequences of loss arising from negligence.  Each joint auditor accepts all the obligations of the office of auditor and this can mean that losses flowing from a wrong auditor's report may be recovered from either of both auditors.  Thus a joint auditor might be financially responsible for losses arising as a consequence of the negligence or incompetence of his fellow auditor.

Before accepting a joint office, an auditor must:

1. Consider whether he is prepared to serve jointly with the other auditor.  He may well ask himself if he would take him as a partner.

2. Assure him that adequate review and control of all aspects of the audit can be prepared.

3. Ensure such professional indemnity insurance cover can be acquiring to cover the individual situation.

Several possible arrangements could be made:

1. Each joint auditor could conduct its own audit with its own standard documentation and files.  Leading schedules would need to be photocopied and exchanged.

2. A unified set of documents and files could be produced by both firms.  This may involve some modification of each firm's methods.

3. Each firm could use one standard set of documents and files using the standards of the larger of the two firms.

Whatever the techniques is used, extensive conversation and planning must lead the commencement of any audit work.

The considerations that are likely to dictate the division of work are as:

i.     Expertise: Each firm may have individual expertise as in specific kinds of client, computers etc.

ii.    Geography: The particular place of the firms and their branches must be believed.

iii.   Competence: One of the joint auditors may be particularly competent along with small clients, the other along with large clients.

iv.   Availability and Size of staff.

v.    Cost: Audit costs may be minimised through a particular division of work.

 

Posted Date: 1/28/2013 5:27:43 AM | Location : United States







Related Discussions:- Procedures followed in conducting an audit, Assignment Help, Ask Question on Procedures followed in conducting an audit, Get Answer, Expert's Help, Procedures followed in conducting an audit Discussions

Write discussion on Procedures followed in conducting an audit
Your posts are moderated
Related Questions
Related Services to Auditing Additionally, audit services, auditors offer other services. These can be categorized as: Assurance engagements: •    Audits •    Reviews Non-a

Audit of Holding Companies and Group Accounts Authoritative documents are as: The Companies Act Cap 486 IAS 27 IAS 28 IAS 31 IFRS 3 ISA 600 r

It is a compulsory audit Completed by a CA. Finance Audit conduct by the CA to compliance the legal requirements of monitory issues.

With internal audit we always require to be careful of any manipulations within the company itself. Errors & frauds within the company cannot be denied /overlooked at any cost.

Accounting Treatment Prescribed by IAS 38 IAS 38 prescribes the accounting treatment about to intangible assets, except: a) Intangible assets which are under the scope of a

Provision and Accruals Previous to we consider the audit procedures along with regard to accruals and provisions, it is essential to clarify the meaning of two words in genera

Verification Procedures - Investment Verification actions should follow the common approach outlined in favor of tangible noncurrent assets. Conversely the following particula

You are auditing the accounts receivable balance of a cable television provider. Individual accounts receivables tend to be similar in amount to each other and cover one or two mon

Limitation of Audit Evidence The quantity and quality of evidence is constrained through the following factors as: Absolute proof is not possible; Some assert

Explain appropriate audit procedures you would apply in verification of cheque payments.