Presumed agency or from cohabitation, Business Law and Ethics

Presumed Agency or from Cohabitation

Whether a woman who is living with a man is deemed that  be his agent for purposes of acquire necessaries to the family; marriage is not necessary.

However "Necessaries" will depend at the standard of living set through the husband and not on the family's authentic income.  Like example is like Nanyuki General Stores v. Mrs Peterson whether the plaintiffs failed for recover the price of the goods so they had sold to the defendant.  Although they thought that she was contracting with them then personally he court held in law contracting for her husband even however she did not tell them like expressly.  Moreover they should have implied this from such the fact that she was like "Mrs".

Posted Date: 1/22/2013 5:16:15 AM | Location : United States







Related Discussions:- Presumed agency or from cohabitation, Assignment Help, Ask Question on Presumed agency or from cohabitation, Get Answer, Expert's Help, Presumed agency or from cohabitation Discussions

Write discussion on Presumed agency or from cohabitation
Your posts are moderated
Related Questions
QUESTION 1 Explain clearly how Public Policy making constitutes a major function of Government QUESTION 2 Account for the role of Public opinion in the identification o

Question 1: (a) What is meant by: (i) Ratio Decidendi (ii) Obiter Dicta (iii) Legal Doctrine (b) Distinguish between Criminal Law and Civil Law.

Hire-Purchase Law A person who wants to buy goods through does not have the like "money consideration" prescribed through the Sale of Goods Act like their price may enter in a

Ratification of Corporate Acts: A number of English cases which are regarded as instances of lifting the veil are those relating to informal ratification by the members of act

Condition for liquidation: The liquidation itself may render a charge over the company's assets void in any of the following circumstances: (a)     the charge was not reg

Question 1: Should the Judicial Committee of the Privy Council be maintained at the summit of the hierarchy of our judicial system? Critically discuss on the above. Ques

What is the neighbour rule? Duty of care: There is a duty of care by anyone to other where this can be reasonably foreseen which one’s action may injure another (negligen

Question 1: (a) "A tourist resort which does business in a single currency is not exposed to currency risk." Discuss (use example to support your answer). (b) Case: Hedging

Standard of proof in criminal cases: Whenever the standard of proof in criminal cases is away from any reasonable doubt.  Further in the event of any reasonable doubt the accu

Transfer of Immovable Property By S.54 Property Act, 1882 as Note: This Act is applicable in the US requires that a transfer of immovable property worth over as 100 rupees mus