Parks test, Advanced Statistics

The Null Hypothesis - H0: β1 = 0 i.e. there is homoscedasticity errors and no heteroscedasticity exists

The Alternative Hypothesis - H1: β1 ≠ 0 i.e. there is no homoscedasticity error and there is heteroscedasticity

MTB > let c33=loge(c20)

MTB > let c34=loge(c7)

MTB > let c35=loge(c8)

MTB > let c36=loge(c9)

MTB > let c37=loge(c10)

C33 = lnsqres

C34 = lntotexp

C35 = lnincome

C36 = lnage

C37 = lnnk

 

Regression Analysis: lnsqres versus lntotexp

The regression equation is

lnsqres = - 5.41 - 0.155 lntotexp

 

Predictor     Coef  SE Coef      T      P

Constant   -5.4069   0.6430  -8.41  0.000

lntotexp   -0.1550   0.1420  -1.09  0.275

 

S = 2.15075   R-Sq = 0.1%   R-Sq(adj) = 0.0%

Analysis of Variance

Source               DF        SS     MS     F      P

Regression         1     5.515  5.515  1.19  0.275

Residual Error  1517  7017.227  4.626

Total                1518  7022.743

Since β1 ≠ 0 and is 0.155, H1 would be accepted suggesting that there are no homoscedasticity errors but there is indication that there is heteroscedasticity.

 

Regression Analysis: lnsqres versus lnincome

The regression equation is

lnsqres = - 5.77 - 0.070 lnincome

 

Predictor     Coef  SE Coef      T      P

Constant   -5.7687   0.7111  -8.11  0.000

lnincome   -0.0698   0.1465  -0.48  0.634

 

S = 2.15143   R-Sq = 0.0%   R-Sq(adj) = 0.0%

Analysis of Variance

Source               DF        SS     MS     F      P

Regression         1     1.050  1.050  0.23  0.634

Residual Error  1517  7021.693  4.629

Total                1518  7022.743

Since β1 ≠ 0 and is 0.070, H1 would be accepted suggesting that there are no homoscedasticity errors but there is indication that there is heteroscedasticity.

Regression Analysis: lnsqres versus lnage

The regression equation is

lnsqres = - 7.23 + 0.315 lnage

 

Predictor     Coef  SE Coef      T      P

Constant   -7.2276   0.9125  -7.92  0.000

lnage         0.3155   0.2563   1.23  0.219

 

S = 2.15052   R-Sq = 0.1%   R-Sq(adj) = 0.0%

 

Analysis of Variance

Source                DF        SS     MS     F      P

Regression          1      7.007  7.007  1.52  0.219

Residual Error    1517  7015.736  4.625

Total                  1518  7022.743

Since β1 ≠ 0 and is 0.315, H1 would be accepted suggesting that there are no homoscedasticity errors but there is indication that there is heteroscedasticity.

Regression Analysis: lnsqres versus lnnk

The regression equation is

lnsqres = - 5.99 - 0.281 lnnk

Predictor     Coef        SE Coef           T      P

Constant   -5.98771  0.08819  -67.89  0.000

lnnk           -0.2812   0.1631   -1.72  0.085

 

S = 2.14949   R-Sq = 0.2%   R-Sq(adj) = 0.1%

Analysis of Variance

Source            DF        SS          MS            F      P

Regression      1       13.738    13.738  2.97  0.085

Residual Error 1517  7009.004  4.620

Total               1518  7022.743

Since β1 ≠ 0 and is 0.281, H1 would be accepted suggesting that there are no homoscedasticity errors but there is indication that there is heteroscedasticity.

MTB > # lntotexp is significant and estimate of beta/2 is -0.155/2 or -0.775

Posted Date: 3/4/2013 6:14:32 AM | Location : United States







Related Discussions:- Parks test, Assignment Help, Ask Question on Parks test, Get Answer, Expert's Help, Parks test Discussions

Write discussion on Parks test
Your posts are moderated
Related Questions
Mauchly test is a test which a variance-covariance matrix of pair wise differences of responses in the set of longitudinal data is the scalar multiple of identity matrix, a proper

Observational study   is the study in which the objective is to discover cause-and-effect relationships but in which it is not feasible to use the controlled experimentation, in th

Isobologram  is a diagram used to characterize the interactions among jointly administered drugs or the chemicals. The contour of the constant response (that is the isobole), which

It is the diagram used to display the values graphically in a frequency distribution. The frequencies are graphed as an ordinate against the class mid-points as abscissae. The p

Perturbation theory : The theory useful in assessing how well a specific algorithm or the statistical model performs when the observations suffer less random changes. In very commo

The contingency tables in which the row and column both the categories follow a natural order. An instance for this might be, drug toxicity ranging from mild to severe, against the

How large would the sample need to be if we are to pick a 95% confidence level sample: (i) From a population of 70; (ii) From a population of 450; (iii) From a population of 1000;

The tabulation of a sample of observations in terms of numbers falling below particular values. The empirical equivalent of the growing probability distribution. An example of such

The method or technique for producing the sequence of parameter estimates that, under the mild regularity conditions, converges to maximum likelihood estimator. Of particular signi

An analyst counted 17 A/B runs and 26 time series observations. Do these results suggest that the data are nonrandom? Explain