Objection to a variation of class rights, Business Law and Ethics

Objection to a variation of class rights:

The company proposed to reduce its share capital by repayment of the 5% 1 pound Cumulative Preference Shares (which were entitled to repayment of capital in priority to ordinary shares)  and to effect repayment by the allotment to the holders an equivalent amount of 6% unsecured loan stock, repayable 1985/90.  The trustees of trusts which held 90% of the issued preference shares voted at a class meeting in favour of the scheme because they had been advised that as holders of 52% of the company's ordinary stock and non-voting ordinary shares they would derive overall benefit from the change.

It was held that the resolution passed at the class meeting was invalid since the trustees who provided the majority of votes cast were not concerned with benefit to holders of the preference shares as a class.  They had instead considered what was best in their own interests, based on their large holding of stock and ordinary shares.  Although this case came to the court for approval of the reduction of share capital and not as an objection to variation of class rights, it is in fact the leading case on the principles which the court will apply in dealing with the objection to a variation of class rights approved by a majority of the class.

Posted Date: 1/15/2013 3:04:55 AM | Location : United States







Related Discussions:- Objection to a variation of class rights, Assignment Help, Ask Question on Objection to a variation of class rights, Get Answer, Expert's Help, Objection to a variation of class rights Discussions

Write discussion on Objection to a variation of class rights
Your posts are moderated
Related Questions
Compensation for Loss of Office: (a) Section 192 makes it unlawful for a company to make a director any payment by way of compensation for loss of office, or  may as considera

What are the state foreign policy The states disregard the operational rule, that power must be counter balanced - they place their over security in jeopardy. "The balance of p

Illustrtaion of Rules relating to consideration Foakes v Beer (1884) Actually On the date 11th of August, 1875 Mrs Beer wrapped judgment next to Dr. Foakes for £2,077 1

Explain the Universal Declaration of Human Rights 1948 The Universal Declaration of Human Rights 1948 (UDHR) is the nucleus of all Human Rights legal instruments from which oth

QUESTION (i) Briefly explain the following in relation to the legal structure of Mauritius- Legislative branch Executive branch Judiciary branch Local Government

What is Utilitarianism?

QUESTION 1 The Financial Services Commission (FSC) is the licensing authority for businesses operating in the Global Business sector. By referring to the Global Business Catego

Judges of Appeal, Attorney and Registrar Judges of Appeal However a "judge of appeal" is a judge that who is appointed to the Court of Appeal. Attorney - General

Amount of compensation payable: In CLARK V URQUHART (44) the court explained that the amount of compensation payable under S.45 of the Act is calculated or measured in the sam

Determine the term - cyclic majority voting The cyclic majority voting, a problem first recognized by Marquis de Condorcet in 1785, the indeterminacy of voting process, has bee