Objection to a variation of class rights, Business Law and Ethics

Objection to a variation of class rights:

The company proposed to reduce its share capital by repayment of the 5% 1 pound Cumulative Preference Shares (which were entitled to repayment of capital in priority to ordinary shares)  and to effect repayment by the allotment to the holders an equivalent amount of 6% unsecured loan stock, repayable 1985/90.  The trustees of trusts which held 90% of the issued preference shares voted at a class meeting in favour of the scheme because they had been advised that as holders of 52% of the company's ordinary stock and non-voting ordinary shares they would derive overall benefit from the change.

It was held that the resolution passed at the class meeting was invalid since the trustees who provided the majority of votes cast were not concerned with benefit to holders of the preference shares as a class.  They had instead considered what was best in their own interests, based on their large holding of stock and ordinary shares.  Although this case came to the court for approval of the reduction of share capital and not as an objection to variation of class rights, it is in fact the leading case on the principles which the court will apply in dealing with the objection to a variation of class rights approved by a majority of the class.

Posted Date: 1/15/2013 3:04:55 AM | Location : United States







Related Discussions:- Objection to a variation of class rights, Assignment Help, Ask Question on Objection to a variation of class rights, Get Answer, Expert's Help, Objection to a variation of class rights Discussions

Write discussion on Objection to a variation of class rights
Your posts are moderated
Related Questions
A strong and fair health care system Today, I delivered on my commitment to have a judicial inquiry into allegations of queue jumping in our health care system. The governm

Provision of Fiduciary Duties - company management: This provision is supplemented by Article 84 of Table A which provides that-  i. The director shall not vote in respect

Business and Social Agreements Business Agreements Therefore is a rebuttable presumption that parties intended generate a legally enforceable agreement to example in Cr

Partnerships - Unincorporated Associations Conversely Partnership is defined through S.3 (1) of the Partnership Act as "the relation that subsists between persons carrying at

Implied Powers:                                     The statement of Lord Cairns in 1875 in Ashbury Rail Co Ltd v Riche (22) to the effect that a contract beyond the objects o

Societies - Unincorporated Associations However these types of associations are registered under the Societies Act 1968.  Section 2(1) of the Act justify a society very broa

PROXIES - meetings and resolutions: By S.136(1), any member of a company entitled to attend and vote at a meeting of the company shall be entitled to appoint one more person (

What is hire purchase?

State the royal assent for the procedure of parliamentary. The Royal Assent: It is specified when the Bill has passes by both Houses successfully and is usually simply fo

Determine the focal point for coordination The focal point for coordination is point C, which is the unique symmetrical Pareto efficient outcome. Compared to this outcome the N