Noncomputability, math, Marketing Management

Theory of Noncomputability, Define Noncomputability

When we want to specify the elements of a set that contains only a few elements, the most direct and obvious way is to exhaustively list all the elements in the set. However, when a set contains a large number of an infinite number of elements, exhaustively listing all elements in the set becomes impractical or impossible. For example, we may have

P = {x|x is a high school student in Illinios}

Where P is a finite set with a large number of elements. We may have,

Q = {x|x is a perfect square}

Where Q is a countably infinite set of integers. Also, we may have,

R = {x| {a, b} ⊆ x}

Note that R is a set of sets such that every element in R has the set {a, b} as a subset.

We want to show that there is a possible pitfall when we specify the elements of a set by specifying the properties that uniquely characterize these elements.

Consider the set

S = {x|x ∉ x}

It seems that we have followed the "recipe" and have defined a set S such that a set x is an element of S ifx ∉ x. Thus for example, {a, b} is an element of S because {a, b} ∉ {a, b}. {{a}} is also an element of S because {{a}} ∉ {{a}}. However, suppose someone wants to know whether S is an element of S. In other words, she wants to know whether S ? S. Following the specification, we say that for S to be an element of S it must be the case that S ∉ S, which is a self contradictory statement. Let us turn around and assume that S is not an element of S; that is S ∉ S. Then, according to the specification, S should be an element of S. That is, if S ∉ S then S ? S- again, a self-contradictory statement. We hasten to point out that what we have said is not just a pun and have by no means attempted to confuse the reader with entangled and complicated syntax. Rather, contrary to our intuition, it is not always the case that we can precisely specify the elements of a set by specifying the properties of the elements in the set. Such an observation was first made by B. Russell in 1911, and is referred to as Russell's appendix. 

Posted Date: 2/15/2012 7:52:29 AM | Location : United States







Related Discussions:- Noncomputability, math, Assignment Help, Ask Question on Noncomputability, math, Get Answer, Expert's Help, Noncomputability, math Discussions

Write discussion on Noncomputability, math
Your posts are moderated
Related Questions
Define the storage in marketing functions of physical treatment. Storage: Goods are usually produced into anticipation of the demand. All they are stored into warehouses u

Explain about the public carriers or transport carriers in distribution channels. Public carriers or transport carriers: Transportation makes a cost centre within distrib

Value proposition of Cadbury dairy milk?

What are processes for selecting target Markets? Market Targeting: Once the form has known its market segment opportunities, this has to evaluate different segments and a

Ordering Stock for ProductPusher An important part of your duties as manager is to determine how much of each product to order for ProductPusher's monthly stock inventory.  Yo

Question 1 Detail the process of marketing a product Question 2 Write a long note on the budgets of company advertising Question 3 Write a long note on advertising as in

What is Message reception Contextual conditions in which messages are received and ascribed meanings are very different. In organisational setting the context is more formal

Illustrate the overview of Trade Advertisement? Trade Advertisement: • Advertisement addressed to wholesalers, • Advertisement addressed to distributors, agents, •

Question: (a) Discuss how information technology has contributed to the expansion of the service sector, illustrating your answer with examples. (b) As a senior bank execut

Importance of marketing to the firm: Marketing plays an important role for the well being of a firm. This is evident from the following words of the Peter F. Ducker, "Marketing