Noncomputability, math, Marketing Management

Theory of Noncomputability, Define Noncomputability

When we want to specify the elements of a set that contains only a few elements, the most direct and obvious way is to exhaustively list all the elements in the set. However, when a set contains a large number of an infinite number of elements, exhaustively listing all elements in the set becomes impractical or impossible. For example, we may have

P = {x|x is a high school student in Illinios}

Where P is a finite set with a large number of elements. We may have,

Q = {x|x is a perfect square}

Where Q is a countably infinite set of integers. Also, we may have,

R = {x| {a, b} ⊆ x}

Note that R is a set of sets such that every element in R has the set {a, b} as a subset.

We want to show that there is a possible pitfall when we specify the elements of a set by specifying the properties that uniquely characterize these elements.

Consider the set

S = {x|x ∉ x}

It seems that we have followed the "recipe" and have defined a set S such that a set x is an element of S ifx ∉ x. Thus for example, {a, b} is an element of S because {a, b} ∉ {a, b}. {{a}} is also an element of S because {{a}} ∉ {{a}}. However, suppose someone wants to know whether S is an element of S. In other words, she wants to know whether S ? S. Following the specification, we say that for S to be an element of S it must be the case that S ∉ S, which is a self contradictory statement. Let us turn around and assume that S is not an element of S; that is S ∉ S. Then, according to the specification, S should be an element of S. That is, if S ∉ S then S ? S- again, a self-contradictory statement. We hasten to point out that what we have said is not just a pun and have by no means attempted to confuse the reader with entangled and complicated syntax. Rather, contrary to our intuition, it is not always the case that we can precisely specify the elements of a set by specifying the properties of the elements in the set. Such an observation was first made by B. Russell in 1911, and is referred to as Russell's appendix. 

Posted Date: 2/15/2012 7:52:29 AM | Location : United States







Related Discussions:- Noncomputability, math, Assignment Help, Ask Question on Noncomputability, math, Get Answer, Expert's Help, Noncomputability, math Discussions

Write discussion on Noncomputability, math
Your posts are moderated
Related Questions
Market segmentation producer or how to segment the market: 1.       Survey stage: this is divided into two parts, (1) focus group discussions and in depth interviews with a v

Question: (a) List and discuss with examples the four factors that influence consumer purchase decision. (b) To what extent ‘branding' is important for a product and ho

Choosing the advertising messages: The task now is to translate all of the objectives into a specific advertising message to meet the goals. Advertising companies very in their

Should video game companies continue to alter their products to include other functions, such as e-mail?


As marketing manager you have been assigned to promote a new product of beer. Your competitors are Angkor & Cambodia beer. Describe the factor that you would have to deal with to

what are the pricing objectives?


How should Shoppers? Stop develop its demand forecasts?

For this Final Project, imagine that an organisation that owns and manages a brand is experiencing a critical downturn in its business. The organisation needs to expand its brand o