Noncomputability, math, Marketing Management

Theory of Noncomputability, Define Noncomputability

When we want to specify the elements of a set that contains only a few elements, the most direct and obvious way is to exhaustively list all the elements in the set. However, when a set contains a large number of an infinite number of elements, exhaustively listing all elements in the set becomes impractical or impossible. For example, we may have

P = {x|x is a high school student in Illinios}

Where P is a finite set with a large number of elements. We may have,

Q = {x|x is a perfect square}

Where Q is a countably infinite set of integers. Also, we may have,

R = {x| {a, b} ⊆ x}

Note that R is a set of sets such that every element in R has the set {a, b} as a subset.

We want to show that there is a possible pitfall when we specify the elements of a set by specifying the properties that uniquely characterize these elements.

Consider the set

S = {x|x ∉ x}

It seems that we have followed the "recipe" and have defined a set S such that a set x is an element of S ifx ∉ x. Thus for example, {a, b} is an element of S because {a, b} ∉ {a, b}. {{a}} is also an element of S because {{a}} ∉ {{a}}. However, suppose someone wants to know whether S is an element of S. In other words, she wants to know whether S ? S. Following the specification, we say that for S to be an element of S it must be the case that S ∉ S, which is a self contradictory statement. Let us turn around and assume that S is not an element of S; that is S ∉ S. Then, according to the specification, S should be an element of S. That is, if S ∉ S then S ? S- again, a self-contradictory statement. We hasten to point out that what we have said is not just a pun and have by no means attempted to confuse the reader with entangled and complicated syntax. Rather, contrary to our intuition, it is not always the case that we can precisely specify the elements of a set by specifying the properties of the elements in the set. Such an observation was first made by B. Russell in 1911, and is referred to as Russell's appendix. 

Posted Date: 2/15/2012 7:52:29 AM | Location : United States







Related Discussions:- Noncomputability, math, Assignment Help, Ask Question on Noncomputability, math, Get Answer, Expert's Help, Noncomputability, math Discussions

Write discussion on Noncomputability, math
Your posts are moderated
Related Questions
Marketing control: Because many surprises occur during the implementation of the marketing plan, the marketing department must practice constant marketing control. Marketing

What are Industrial Goods? Industrial Goods: Industrial goods are divided in five categories further. These goods are not directly utilized by consumers: installations, a

formula for the calculation of the area of equilateral triangle

Adver tising Advertising added any printed or broadcast message sent and paid for by a recognized organization to a goal market via television, radio, newspapers, magazine

various approches of test marketing in FMCG

Purpose: The purpose of this paper is for the student to reflect on the historical and current image and voice of nursing and the profession of nursing are affected. The student w

How is accessibility to customers increased in e-commerce? Increased accessibility to customers: a. Permit people to accomplish operations without barriers of time that i

Generic Product A generic product is an unbranded, inexpensive, plainly packaged version of a common consumer product. It is usually standard for slightly substandard quality c

Factors influencing changes in product mix 1.       Change in market demand: the change in the demand of a product (due to change in habits, fashion, purchasing power, in

What is different between Marketing Information System and Marketing research? Marketing Information System has extensive in scope with compared to marketing research. Whereas