Non - sl languages, Theory of Computation

The key thing about the Suffx Substitution Closure property is that it does not make any explicit reference to the automaton that recognizes the language.

While the argument that establishes it is based on the properties of a Myhill graph that we know must exist, those properties are properties of Myhill graphs in general and don't depend on the speci?cs of that particular graph. This lets us reason about the strings in an SL2 language without having to actually produce the automaton that recognizes it. Perhaps more importantly, it lets us establish that a particular language is not SL2 by supposing (counterfactually) that it was SL2 and showing that Suffx Substitution Closure would then imply that it included strings that it should not.

Posted Date: 3/21/2013 6:11:15 AM | Location : United States







Related Discussions:- Non - sl languages, Assignment Help, Ask Question on Non - sl languages, Get Answer, Expert's Help, Non - sl languages Discussions

Write discussion on Non - sl languages
Your posts are moderated
Related Questions

Different types of applications and numerous programming languages have been developed to make easy the task of writing programs. The assortment of programming languages shows, dif

The generalization of the interpretation of strictly local automata as generators is similar, in some respects, to the generalization of Myhill graphs. Again, the set of possible s

Exercise Show, using Suffix Substitution Closure, that L 3 . L 3 ∈ SL 2 . Explain how it can be the case that L 3 . L 3 ∈ SL 2 , while L 3 . L 3 ⊆ L + 3 and L + 3 ∈ SL

can you plz help with some project ideas relatede to DFA or NFA or anything

Find the Regular Grammar for the following Regular Expression:                    a(a+b)*(ab*+ba*)b.

#Your company has 25 licenses for a computer program, but you discover that it has been copied onto 80 computers. You informed your supervisor, but he/she is not willing to take an

The key thing about the Suffx Substitution Closure property is that it does not make any explicit reference to the automaton that recognizes the language. While the argument tha

prove following function is turing computable? f(m)={m-2,if m>2, {1,if

Computer has a single unbounded precision counter which you can only increment, decrement and test for zero. (You may assume that it is initially zero or you may include an explici