Non - sl languages, Theory of Computation

The key thing about the Suffx Substitution Closure property is that it does not make any explicit reference to the automaton that recognizes the language.

While the argument that establishes it is based on the properties of a Myhill graph that we know must exist, those properties are properties of Myhill graphs in general and don't depend on the speci?cs of that particular graph. This lets us reason about the strings in an SL2 language without having to actually produce the automaton that recognizes it. Perhaps more importantly, it lets us establish that a particular language is not SL2 by supposing (counterfactually) that it was SL2 and showing that Suffx Substitution Closure would then imply that it included strings that it should not.

Posted Date: 3/21/2013 6:11:15 AM | Location : United States







Related Discussions:- Non - sl languages, Assignment Help, Ask Question on Non - sl languages, Get Answer, Expert's Help, Non - sl languages Discussions

Write discussion on Non - sl languages
Your posts are moderated
Related Questions
A problem is said to be unsolvable if no algorithm can solve it. The problem is said to be undecidable if it is a decision problem and no algorithm can decide it. It should be note

construct a social network from the real-world data, perform some simple network analyses using Gephi, and interpret the results.

If the first three words are the boys down,what are the last three words??

1. Does above all''s properties can be used to prove a language regular? 2..which of the properties can be used to prove a language regular and which of these not? 3..Identify one

Suppose A = (Q,Σ, T, q 0 , F) is a DFA and that Q = {q 0 , q 1 , . . . , q n-1 } includes n states. Thinking of the automaton in terms of its transition graph, a string x is recogn

In Exercise 9 you showed that the recognition problem and universal recognition problem for SL2 are decidable. We can use the structure of Myhill graphs to show that other problems

1. Simulate a TM with infinite tape on both ends using a two-track TM with finite storage 2. Prove the following language is non-Turing recognizable using the diagnolization

In general non-determinism, by introducing a degree of parallelism, may increase the accepting power of a model of computation. But if we subject NFAs to the same sort of analysis

Let G be a graph with n > 2 vertices with (n2 - 3n + 4)/2 edges. Prove that G is connected.

Computer has a single unbounded precision counter which you can only increment, decrement and test for zero. (You may assume that it is initially zero or you may include an explici