Negligence in general, Auditing

Negligence in General

There is no case against auditors and this made it hard to be accurate as to where the auditor’s legal liability falls.  We require therefore referring to decided cased. Though even in countries there are in fact very few decided cases against the auditors. The vast majority of actions against auditors are completed out of court. This saves what could or else be very costly court costs.  It is also important to note that this saves dragging the professional firm's name via the courts and most probable via the newspapers. Firms are of course concerned to avoid such awful publicity.

It is though usually known that the auditor's liability falls beneath three specific headings:

(a) To his clients underneath contract law;
(b) To third parties beneath the law of tort;
(c) Civil and criminal liability beneath statute law

To his clients: 

The auditor is under responsibility to report to the members in common meetings on all accounts observed by him and lay before them. His contract is thus with the company as an entire and not with separate shareholders. The auditor can thus be accused of carelessness if:

(a) He fails to notice scam or error that he must reasonably have noticed;
(b) When he fails to obey with generally admitted auditing standards and practices.

Though, it is also usually held that for an auditor to suffer real financial loss, the following situation should be met.

  • He must be confirmed to have been neglectful;
  • The complainant should have suffered a loss;
  • The loss should be as a direct result of his reliance on the auditor's report and the auditor’s carelessness.

 

Hence when the auditor fails to detect a scam that is immaterial to the accounts and unless there are suspicious situations which he had observed or must reasonably have observed, it is unlikely that he will be held neglectful.

Even when the fraud was material to the accounts, he might still escape liability if detection could not reasonably have been attained by using normal audit process.  It should be admitted though this is a very dubious region of law.

The auditor has no responsibility to separate shareholders. A shareholder who makes an investment decision by relying on the auditor's report and suffers loss cannot claim under the law of contract. Only when the company as an entire has suffered, can the entire body of shareholders claim from the auditor.

Posted Date: 12/3/2012 5:00:54 AM | Location : United States







Related Discussions:- Negligence in general, Assignment Help, Ask Question on Negligence in general, Get Answer, Expert's Help, Negligence in general Discussions

Write discussion on Negligence in general
Your posts are moderated
Related Questions
Q. Explain about Wash Sale? Wash Sale - A wash sale takes place if stock or securities are sold at a LOSS and seller acquires substantially identical stock or SECURITIES 30 day

IAS 12 Income Taxes 1AS 12 needs a deferred tax liability should be well known for all taxable temporary difference with minor exceptions as goodwill that is not allowable for

(a) In order to draw reasonable conclusions, an auditor is required to identify and use audit procedures to gather audit evidence. You are required to identify and explain, five

Standardization of Working Papers - Auditing The ICPAK guideline states that the needs of standardized working papers may improve the effectiveness along with that they are re

Valuation and Allocation - Audit Process As we saw assets are usually valued at cost or a valuation less a provision for usage or loss of value.  We have to ensure therefore t

Audit of Assets- Audit Process Non current assets have the fundamental characteristic which they are held for require in the business and not about resale. IAS 1 Presentation

Advantages and disadvantages

Attempts at definition of the 'true and fair' view There following quotations represent authoritative views on the meaning of true and fair view. A true and fair view impli

Long-Term Liabilities Long-term liabilities are generally evidenced through an agreement called a debenture. For this purpose, long-term loans are often called debentures. The

State four factors considered determining sufficiency of audit evidence