Nash equilibrium, Game Theory

 

A Nash equilibrium, named when John Nash, may be a set of methods, one for every player, such that no player has incentive to unilaterally amendment her action. Players are in equilibrium if a amendment in methods by anyone of them would lead that player to earn but if she remained along with her current strategy. For games during which players randomize (mixed strategies), the expected or average payoff should be a minimum of as massive as that obtainable by the other strategy.

 

Posted Date: 7/21/2012 4:36:02 AM | Location : United States







Related Discussions:- Nash equilibrium, Assignment Help, Ask Question on Nash equilibrium, Get Answer, Expert's Help, Nash equilibrium Discussions

Write discussion on Nash equilibrium
Your posts are moderated
Related Questions
One of the foremost common assumptions created in game theory (along with common information of rationality). In its mildest kind, rationality implies that each player is motivated

How much time you want to spend on this material willdepend on the focus of your course. For many social sciencecourses, a general exposure to the ideas, based on a quick runthroug

Two individuals, Player 1 and Player 2, are competing in an auction to obtain a valuable object. Each player bids in a sealed envelope, without knowing the bid of the other player.

A method by that players assume that the methods of their opponents are randomly chosen from some unknown stationary distribution. In every amount, a player selects her best respon

Explain oligopoly's structure and use game theory to explain why oligopoly firms tend not to use price to compete. Answer- Oligopoly is an imperfect market where there are

What terms are included in the monopolistic competition? Product Differentiation: 1. The meaning of monopolistic competition and product differentiation 2. Why monopolist

In any game, payoffs are numbers that represent the motivations of players. Payoffs might represent profit, quantity, "utility," or different continuous measures (cardinal payoffs)

A priori knowledge usually enables us to decide that some coefficients must be zero in the particular equation, while they assume non-zero values in other equations of the system.

Consider two quantity-setting firms that produce a homogeneous good. The inverse demand function for the good is p = A - (q 1 +q 2 ). Both firms have a cost function C = q 2 (a

if the first three words are "the boy''s down" what are the last three words?