Nash equilibrium, Game Theory

 

A Nash equilibrium, named when John Nash, may be a set of methods, one for every player, such that no player has incentive to unilaterally amendment her action. Players are in equilibrium if a amendment in methods by anyone of them would lead that player to earn but if she remained along with her current strategy. For games during which players randomize (mixed strategies), the expected or average payoff should be a minimum of as massive as that obtainable by the other strategy.

 

Posted Date: 7/21/2012 4:36:02 AM | Location : United States







Related Discussions:- Nash equilibrium, Assignment Help, Ask Question on Nash equilibrium, Get Answer, Expert's Help, Nash equilibrium Discussions

Write discussion on Nash equilibrium
Your posts are moderated
Related Questions
Nineteenth century French economist attributed with the introduction of the theory of profit maximizing producers. In his masterpiece, The Recherches, published in 1838, Cournot pr

A type of initial worth auction during which a "clock" initially indicates a worth for the item for sale substantially beyond any bidder is probably going to pay. Then, the clock g

An outcome of a game is Pareto dominated if another outcome would build a minimum of one player at an advantage while not hurting the other player. That is, another outcome is weak

1. (a) True or False: If a 2x2 game has a unique pure strategy Nash Equilibrium, then both players always have dominant strategies. (b) Draw a table representing the Prisoner.s Dil

In a repeated game it is often unspecified that players move concurrently at predefined time intervals. However, if few players update their policies at different time intervals, t

1. This question and the next is based on the following description. Consider the coalitional game (referred to as Game 1) given by: N = {1,2,3,4}; v(N) = 3, v{i} = 0, i = 1,...,4,

Another term for a preserved bid auction in which bidders simultaneously submit bids to the auctioneer with no knowledge of the amount bid by other member. Usually, the uppermost b

What is the different monopolistic competition and perfect competition? Monopolistic Competition versus Perfect Competition Into the long-run equilibrium of a monopolistical

Cardinal payoffs are numbers representing the outcomes of a game where the numbers represent some continuum of values, such as money, market share or quantity. Cardinal payoffs per

A sequential game is one among imperfect data if a player doesn't grasp precisely what actions different players took up to that time. Technically, there exists a minimum of one da