Misfeasance - winding up, Business Law and Ethics

Misfeasance:

Under s.324, misfeasance proceedings may be instituted against a director, promoter, manager, liquidator or "officer" (including an auditor) of a company in liquidation either to recover the company's property from him or to claim compensation for the loss to the company caused by his misfeasance.

The most obvious case of misfeasance is where a director or other officer of the company is found to have misappropriated property of the company.  He can be compelled by misfeasance proceedings to return it.  His conduct may also be criminal misappropriation of property for which he can be prosecuted.

The other type of misfeasance case is where the company has suffered loss owing to the incompetence or neglect of a director or other officer.  It is not however easy to establish that there has been breach of a fiduciary duty such that an order should be made (on grounds of misfeasance) for payment of compensation.  For some lesser default the liquidator could bring an action for negligence.

In the context of misfeasance proceedings an auditor is exceptionally an "officer" who can be liable: he is not an "officer" in any other situation since he has no management functions.

A receiver is not an "officer" who can be held liable (if the company later goes into liquidation) for misfeasance.

                                      Case. RE B JOHNSON & JOHNSON CO (BUILDERS) (1955)

Misfeasance proceeds were brought against a receiver on the ground that he had in his management of the company's business taken decisions which were "detrimental from the company's point of view", eg. closing down parts of its business. 

Held:

A receiver is a representative of the secured creditors by or for whom he is appointed.  He is not an officer of the company who can be liable for misfeasance. If however a receiver does not act bona fide (ie. honestly) the company might have a claim against him but not misfeasance.

Posted Date: 1/15/2013 5:52:14 AM | Location : United States







Related Discussions:- Misfeasance - winding up, Assignment Help, Ask Question on Misfeasance - winding up, Get Answer, Expert's Help, Misfeasance - winding up Discussions

Write discussion on Misfeasance - winding up
Your posts are moderated
Related Questions
Transfer or Passing of Property - Sales of Goods Perhaps assuming like the seller has a right to sell the goods, so it like necessary to determine the precise moment the trans

Jerry contracted with Sally to purchase Sally’s Restaurant for $50,000ion #Minimum 100 words accepted#

QUESTION (a) Mr Raj owns a plot of land and wishes to invest in the tourism industry and seeks your advice as to whether he needs to apply for a tourist enterprise licence and

Proceedings for Compulsory Liquidation: When the petition is presented to the court a copy is delivered to the company in case it objects, and it is advertised so that other

QUESTION 1 One of the main ingredients of a system of collective bargaining is the right to join and participate in the activities of a trade union. What is the extent of this

Exceptions: The rule in Turquand's case will not apply if: i.The person suing the company is in fact an insider, such as a director of the company: Howard v Patent Ivory

QUESTION 1 Explain clearly how Public Policy making constitutes a major function of Government QUESTION 2 Account for the role of Public opinion in the identification o

Question 1: Public Private Partnership (PPP) means investment through private sector participation by a contractual arrangement between a procuring entity and a private sector

a) Explain two scenarios in which a restraint of trade clause would typically be used. b) Suppose your employer wanted to include a restraint of trade clause in your employment

Vacation of Office: In addition to vacating office under the aforesaid provisions of Article 88 a person may cease to be a director for various reasons like as;-