Misfeasance - winding up, Business Law and Ethics

Misfeasance:

Under s.324, misfeasance proceedings may be instituted against a director, promoter, manager, liquidator or "officer" (including an auditor) of a company in liquidation either to recover the company's property from him or to claim compensation for the loss to the company caused by his misfeasance.

The most obvious case of misfeasance is where a director or other officer of the company is found to have misappropriated property of the company.  He can be compelled by misfeasance proceedings to return it.  His conduct may also be criminal misappropriation of property for which he can be prosecuted.

The other type of misfeasance case is where the company has suffered loss owing to the incompetence or neglect of a director or other officer.  It is not however easy to establish that there has been breach of a fiduciary duty such that an order should be made (on grounds of misfeasance) for payment of compensation.  For some lesser default the liquidator could bring an action for negligence.

In the context of misfeasance proceedings an auditor is exceptionally an "officer" who can be liable: he is not an "officer" in any other situation since he has no management functions.

A receiver is not an "officer" who can be held liable (if the company later goes into liquidation) for misfeasance.

                                      Case. RE B JOHNSON & JOHNSON CO (BUILDERS) (1955)

Misfeasance proceeds were brought against a receiver on the ground that he had in his management of the company's business taken decisions which were "detrimental from the company's point of view", eg. closing down parts of its business. 

Held:

A receiver is a representative of the secured creditors by or for whom he is appointed.  He is not an officer of the company who can be liable for misfeasance. If however a receiver does not act bona fide (ie. honestly) the company might have a claim against him but not misfeasance.

Posted Date: 1/15/2013 5:52:14 AM | Location : United States







Related Discussions:- Misfeasance - winding up, Assignment Help, Ask Question on Misfeasance - winding up, Get Answer, Expert's Help, Misfeasance - winding up Discussions

Write discussion on Misfeasance - winding up
Your posts are moderated
Related Questions
DIVIDENDS: As a commercial term, the word "dividends" has a variable meaning which depends on the context in which it is used. For purposes of company law, it denotes the paym

Unincorporated Associations:                 A group of people may come together in order to pursue or  promote a common purpose or activity but without going through the vari

how evidence is used to prove a criminal offence: This question is asking you to consider the importance of evidence, how it is used and how reliable it may be in supporting

Appointment of Arbitrators However under sec 12(1) the parties are free just for agree on the procedure of appointing arbitrators. Therefore under sec 31(1) the parties are

As you have already learned during your tenure at Midwest Valueland (MV) and from exposure to business news, it is not unusual for leaders and managers to encounter ethical situati

1. Explain the role of ‘Ethics' in Entrepreneurship. 2. What do you understand by ‘Public Limited Company'? 3. Difference between ‘Intrapreneur' & ‘Intrepreneur'. 4. What is ‘Copyr

Formation and Characteristics of Agency An agency may come into existence by the following ways: Contract (Appointment) or agreement Further this can be done in any

Court-Martial Establishment Moreover Section 65 (1) of the Constitution empowers Parliament to establish court martial that shall have such jurisdiction and powers as m

Goods - Sales of Goods Even if "goods" like in common parlance has like the Act has given the word such technical meaning. Whether it provides like; "goods" consist of "all chat

Unsecured trade creditors: It refers to a "class" of members or of creditors. Obviously if two or more companies are involved or if one company has two classes of shares, eg.