Misfeasance - winding up, Business Law and Ethics

Misfeasance:

Under s.324, misfeasance proceedings may be instituted against a director, promoter, manager, liquidator or "officer" (including an auditor) of a company in liquidation either to recover the company's property from him or to claim compensation for the loss to the company caused by his misfeasance.

The most obvious case of misfeasance is where a director or other officer of the company is found to have misappropriated property of the company.  He can be compelled by misfeasance proceedings to return it.  His conduct may also be criminal misappropriation of property for which he can be prosecuted.

The other type of misfeasance case is where the company has suffered loss owing to the incompetence or neglect of a director or other officer.  It is not however easy to establish that there has been breach of a fiduciary duty such that an order should be made (on grounds of misfeasance) for payment of compensation.  For some lesser default the liquidator could bring an action for negligence.

In the context of misfeasance proceedings an auditor is exceptionally an "officer" who can be liable: he is not an "officer" in any other situation since he has no management functions.

A receiver is not an "officer" who can be held liable (if the company later goes into liquidation) for misfeasance.

                                      Case. RE B JOHNSON & JOHNSON CO (BUILDERS) (1955)

Misfeasance proceeds were brought against a receiver on the ground that he had in his management of the company's business taken decisions which were "detrimental from the company's point of view", eg. closing down parts of its business. 

Held:

A receiver is a representative of the secured creditors by or for whom he is appointed.  He is not an officer of the company who can be liable for misfeasance. If however a receiver does not act bona fide (ie. honestly) the company might have a claim against him but not misfeasance.

Posted Date: 1/15/2013 5:52:14 AM | Location : United States







Related Discussions:- Misfeasance - winding up, Assignment Help, Ask Question on Misfeasance - winding up, Get Answer, Expert's Help, Misfeasance - winding up Discussions

Write discussion on Misfeasance - winding up
Your posts are moderated
Related Questions
Question Note the behaviour of all parties with respect to the Mitchell Jones scenario which is (or could potentially be) a breach of the RTL Code and why you believe the beh

writhe some stetment about morality of international context

(a) How will you plan to establish your own business? (b) What are the merits and demerits in owning a business? (c) What are the aspects you have to think in establishing an

Liability:             The secretary is an officer of the company and thus he owes fiduciary duties to the company which are similar to those of a director, eg. he must act in

A strong and fair health care system Today, I delivered on my commitment to have a judicial inquiry into allegations of queue jumping in our health care system. The governm

Pre-incorporation Contracts:                             A pre-incorporated contract is an agreement which is entered into, usually by a promoter or promoters, on behalf of a

Calls On Contributories:                                       Every person who is a member of the company at the commencement of winding up and every past member is in princi

QUESTION The Employment Rights Act provides- No employer shall terminate a worker's agreement for reasons related to the worker's misconduct unless the worker has been affor

Types oF Goods - Sales of Goods Further the Act classifies goods into: like; (i) Specific Goods Whether specific goods are "goods" like are acknowledged and agreed on

Set of circumstances of policy maker The distinction leads to think what to say then, to a policy, which is feasible in only one set of circumstances. Then the expectations on