Misfeasance - winding up, Business Law and Ethics

Misfeasance:

Under s.324, misfeasance proceedings may be instituted against a director, promoter, manager, liquidator or "officer" (including an auditor) of a company in liquidation either to recover the company's property from him or to claim compensation for the loss to the company caused by his misfeasance.

The most obvious case of misfeasance is where a director or other officer of the company is found to have misappropriated property of the company.  He can be compelled by misfeasance proceedings to return it.  His conduct may also be criminal misappropriation of property for which he can be prosecuted.

The other type of misfeasance case is where the company has suffered loss owing to the incompetence or neglect of a director or other officer.  It is not however easy to establish that there has been breach of a fiduciary duty such that an order should be made (on grounds of misfeasance) for payment of compensation.  For some lesser default the liquidator could bring an action for negligence.

In the context of misfeasance proceedings an auditor is exceptionally an "officer" who can be liable: he is not an "officer" in any other situation since he has no management functions.

A receiver is not an "officer" who can be held liable (if the company later goes into liquidation) for misfeasance.

                                      Case. RE B JOHNSON & JOHNSON CO (BUILDERS) (1955)

Misfeasance proceeds were brought against a receiver on the ground that he had in his management of the company's business taken decisions which were "detrimental from the company's point of view", eg. closing down parts of its business. 

Held:

A receiver is a representative of the secured creditors by or for whom he is appointed.  He is not an officer of the company who can be liable for misfeasance. If however a receiver does not act bona fide (ie. honestly) the company might have a claim against him but not misfeasance.

Posted Date: 1/15/2013 5:52:14 AM | Location : United States







Related Discussions:- Misfeasance - winding up, Assignment Help, Ask Question on Misfeasance - winding up, Get Answer, Expert's Help, Misfeasance - winding up Discussions

Write discussion on Misfeasance - winding up
Your posts are moderated
Related Questions
Following are different time zones in which the issue of Jammu & Kashmir could be divided: 1. 1947: when the dispute came up 2. 1948-1957: when the matter goes to UN, the su

Determine the term Uncertainty - Policy process We know that uncertainty is one of main influencing factor in policy process and especially in coordination of economic policies

As a senior HR officer in Catastrophe Concepts HR department, you have been asked by George Chapel to prepare a management briefing regarding the situation. Your report should:

Normal 0 false false false EN-IN X-NONE X-NONE MicrosoftInternetExplorer4

Explain the term RECOGNITION RECOGNITION The term Recognition under international law means and involves the acceptance or acknowledgment of the existence by a State of an

QUESTION (a) Tom is 15 ½ and he has not eaten for three days because his parents did not have any money to buy food when he approached Mr. Taylor for a job in his factory and t

The United States form of government is often described as a "Constitutional Democracy ". The existence and importance of a written Constitution is a major difference between the A

What are the Consensus in the political stream Political events move along at their own pace, and according to their own dynamics and rules. Developments in the political sphe

Q. Name based definition of phoenix activity? The approach taken in New Zealand has been to define phoenix activity in terms of the re-use of the name, or a name similar, to th

Utmost Good Faith Whether a partnership is such contract of the chief good faith. Every one partner is entitled for utmost gaviness rom his co-partners. Therefore this equitab