Misfeasance - winding up, Business Law and Ethics

Misfeasance:

Under s.324, misfeasance proceedings may be instituted against a director, promoter, manager, liquidator or "officer" (including an auditor) of a company in liquidation either to recover the company's property from him or to claim compensation for the loss to the company caused by his misfeasance.

The most obvious case of misfeasance is where a director or other officer of the company is found to have misappropriated property of the company.  He can be compelled by misfeasance proceedings to return it.  His conduct may also be criminal misappropriation of property for which he can be prosecuted.

The other type of misfeasance case is where the company has suffered loss owing to the incompetence or neglect of a director or other officer.  It is not however easy to establish that there has been breach of a fiduciary duty such that an order should be made (on grounds of misfeasance) for payment of compensation.  For some lesser default the liquidator could bring an action for negligence.

In the context of misfeasance proceedings an auditor is exceptionally an "officer" who can be liable: he is not an "officer" in any other situation since he has no management functions.

A receiver is not an "officer" who can be held liable (if the company later goes into liquidation) for misfeasance.

                                      Case. RE B JOHNSON & JOHNSON CO (BUILDERS) (1955)

Misfeasance proceeds were brought against a receiver on the ground that he had in his management of the company's business taken decisions which were "detrimental from the company's point of view", eg. closing down parts of its business. 

Held:

A receiver is a representative of the secured creditors by or for whom he is appointed.  He is not an officer of the company who can be liable for misfeasance. If however a receiver does not act bona fide (ie. honestly) the company might have a claim against him but not misfeasance.

Posted Date: 1/15/2013 5:52:14 AM | Location : United States







Related Discussions:- Misfeasance - winding up, Assignment Help, Ask Question on Misfeasance - winding up, Get Answer, Expert's Help, Misfeasance - winding up Discussions

Write discussion on Misfeasance - winding up
Your posts are moderated
Related Questions
Question : (a) Discuss the four main reasons for planning public relations programmes. (b) How you would define ‘publics' and give two examples of internal and external pu

Law Society of US Establishment However it is established through sec 3 of the Law Society of US Act Cap 18.  Hence it is a body corporate through the name Law Society

Q. Describe the Cole Inquiry recommendation? In 2003 the Cole Inquiry made a range of recommendations to reform the building and construction industry. The Inquiry found that t

As part of this project, expert input was provided by employment law specialists Herbert Geer. Herbert Geer raised the possibility that the FWO could recover amounts lost by indivi

PROTECTION OF CREDITORS: Where the reduction of capital involves diminution of unpaid capital or repayment to shareholders of paid-up capital, creditors have a statutory right

Criminal Law: However criminal law has been defined as the law of crimes.  So a crime has been defined just like an act or omission or committed, omitted in violation of publi

Legal Profession - Judges However in general speaking that judges of the High Court of Kenya are appointed from among advocates of in case of seven years' standing as like i.e

Discuss the Role of agend setting in policy process In policy process, agenda setting plays a vital role. It helps determine what policies are chosen. When there are many compe

Registration of Prospectus:  S.43 (1) provides that no prospectus shall be issued by or on behalf of a company unless, on or before the date of its publication, there has been

Explain the basic criticism of the stages framework The basic criticism of the stages framework is that it, in a formal sense, parallels the cognitive steps of the rational ap