Mischief rule, Business Law and Ethics

Mischief rule:

"Four things are to be considered and discussed:;

(i) First is 'what was the common law earlier than the making of the Act?'

(ii) is 'what was the mischief and defect for that the common law did not offer'

(iii) is 'what remedy has Parliament appointed resolved to cure the disease?'

(iv) and  forth is 'what is the true reason for the remedy?'  Judges shall.... make such construction as shall suppress the advance and the remedy".

However a statute will only be construed in signify with this rule whether its construction in accordance relates to the literal rule would fail to suppress or the mischief or punish.  There an example like a case of SMITH v HUGHES whether it was held that a prostitute who attracted the consideration of passers from a balcony window above the street had solicited in a street within Section 1(1) of the English Street Offences Act, 1959.  Therefore the judge stated as follows: as;

"I approach the issue through considering like as what is the mischief aimed at through this Act.  Everybody knows that this was an Act intended to clean up the streets then to enable people to walk along the streets without being molested or solicited through common prostitutes".

However viewed into way that the actual place from whether a prostitute attracted the attention of somebody walking in the street did not matter as well as she will be deemed to have solicited in the street.

Posted Date: 1/16/2013 2:55:55 AM | Location : United States







Related Discussions:- Mischief rule, Assignment Help, Ask Question on Mischief rule, Get Answer, Expert's Help, Mischief rule Discussions

Write discussion on Mischief rule
Your posts are moderated
Related Questions
Mrs. Lanuzzi began smoking in 1951 when she was fifteen. She smoked two packs a day until her death from lung cancer in 1984. She had tried several times, unsuccessfully, to quit.

Trading arrangements: From this statement, it can be inferred that, if a court held that a company acted in a particular instance as an agent of its holding company, the veil

EXPLAINING THE PURPOSE OF THE CB ASSIGNMENTS An essential part of understanding the law is being able to read, digest, and synthesize legal cases (also referred to as case law o

Procedural Technicalities: In fact here the procedure in the common law courts was highly technical and many good causes of action that were lost due to procedural technicalit

Question 1: (i) Explain clearly the difference between Individual Bargaining and Collective Bargaining highlighting with examples the contexts in which each of them applies.

Question 1: (a) In which instances would the legal burden shift on the defence? (b) Briefly describe the purpose of Cross Examination? (c) What are the characteristics of C

Vacation of Office: In addition to vacating office under the aforesaid provisions of Article 88 a person may cease to be a director for various reasons like as;-

Directors to perform the duties: Therefore it cannot be that the auditors  are to be at the expense and trouble not merely of sending their report through the post but of deli

How was Negligence the main cause? Negligence was the major cause: A claim for damages can only succeed when there has been damage or loss to the claimant. Illustrations

LEGAL PROTECTION OF MINORITIES: According to decisions of English courts, companies are democratic organisations whose affairs are to be managed by the directors according to