Measure account for risk, Risk Management

The asset management industry uses a variety of "performance measures" to asses the relative performance of managed portfolios or funds, mostly (but not always) relative to an appropriate benchmark. One such measure, the "Sharpe ratio", was introduced in the  lectures. The "Treynor ratio" is defined in very much the same way, with the only exception that the denominator is not the portfolio's volatility ("sigma"), but instead it's  "beta" (i.e. the slope coefficient in a CAPM-style regression of portfolio returns onto a benchmark). Another performance measure used frequently is "alpha" (the intercept in the aforementioned regression). There are other measures (e.g. "M2" or the "Information  Ratio"); feel free to include any of these in your discussion at your discretion.

(a) Provide a discussion of the characteristics of these performance measures (and any others you may choose to include). Discuss in particular:

  • What exactly is being measured?
  • How does the measure account for risk (and what kind of risk)?
  • What are the differences between the measures?

(b) Discuss what performance measure(s) you would employ (and why?) if you were any of the following:

  • The manager of a "fund of funds", selecting a portfolio of funds.
  • A "high-net-worth" individual choosing a hedge fund to invest in.
  • An individual choosing a pension fund to invest their life savings.

(c) Below are two statements that we found in articles on performance measures.

Chose either one of these statements and provide a brief discussion:

 Statement (1):

 Investors use performance measures to decide where to drop their money. But clearly, since very few of us can see into the future, we are constrained to using historical (past) data to compute those measures. But investors probably do not care about how much they would have made if they had invested in the fund in the past, but how much they will make in the future if they invest now. The question is thus, how much does past performance tell us about future performance? Based on the empirical evidence, the answer seems to be: very little!

Posted Date: 2/22/2013 6:12:23 AM | Location : United States







Related Discussions:- Measure account for risk, Assignment Help, Ask Question on Measure account for risk, Get Answer, Expert's Help, Measure account for risk Discussions

Write discussion on Measure account for risk
Your posts are moderated
Related Questions
Question: (a) What are the two major types of risk analysis? (b) Which type is generally used in risk analysis of information systems and why? (c) Explain the methodology

Beta- measure of systematic risk for an investor who holds the shares of one company, it is total variance that is more relevant. But for most usual active investor who wishes to d

Systematic Risk Systematic risk is any risk which affects the value of a huge number of assets; therefore, each asset will have a various degree of sensitivity to the underlyin

State about the Interest Rate Risk Variability in a security's return resulting from changes in the level of interest rates is referred to as interest rate risk. Such change

Q. Show Security market line? The CML represent the equilibrium relation between the expected return and standard for efficient portfolio. But it does not indicate how individu

On successful completion of FSAP, the EC concluded that the EU FS industry still had strong untapped economic and employment growth potential. As a result, the White Paper on Finan

what are the characteristics of hedgeable risks


The risk register and risk management strategy should justify and report on the rationale of the register, priority and its management . Guidelines Risk  is assessed

what are the listing procedures for a company in international stock exchange