Local and recognizable languages, Theory of Computation

We developed the idea of FSA by generalizing LTk transition graphs. Not surprisingly, then, every LTk transition graph is also the transition graph of a FSA (in fact a DFA)-the one in which the state set Q is just the set of nodes of the LTk transition graph. We get, as an immediate consequence, that every LT language (and, hence, every SL language and every ?nite language) is recognizable. In generalizing to arbitrary state sets, though, we have actually increased the power of our automata.

Posted Date: 3/21/2013 3:36:25 AM | Location : United States







Related Discussions:- Local and recognizable languages, Assignment Help, Ask Question on Local and recognizable languages, Get Answer, Expert's Help, Local and recognizable languages Discussions

Write discussion on Local and recognizable languages
Your posts are moderated
Related Questions
Let G be a graph with n > 2 vertices with (n2 - 3n + 4)/2 edges. Prove that G is connected.

I want a proof for any NP complete problem


Theorem The class of ?nite languages is a proper subclass of SL. Note that the class of ?nite languages is closed under union and concatenation but SL is not closed under either. N

Another way of representing a strictly 2-local automaton is with a Myhill graph. These are directed graphs in which the vertices are labeled with symbols from the input alphabet of

We have now de?ned classes of k-local languages for all k ≥ 2. Together, these classes form the Strictly Local Languages in general. De?nition (Strictly Local Languages) A langu


Question 2 (10 pt): In this question we look at an extension to DFAs. A composable-reset DFA (CR-DFA) is a five-tuple, (Q,S,d,q0,F) where: – Q is the set of states, – S is the alph

The Recognition Problem for a class of languages is the question of whether a given string is a member of a given language. An instance consists of a string and a (?nite) speci?cat

Exercise:  Give a construction that converts a strictly 2-local automaton for a language L into one that recognizes the language L r . Justify the correctness of your construction.