Limited partnerships, Business Law and Ethics

Limited Partnerships

Through virtue of the Limited Partnerships Act, such the liability of certain partners that may be limited to a certain extent. Further the chief provisions of the Act are as:

(a)The number of partners in a limited partnership is such restricted to twenty. And one is

(b) In a limited type of partnership there be obliged to be one, or much general partners such who are liable for all the debts that so other liabilities of the firm. And one is

(c)Conversely in addition to the general partner or partners such there will be one or much limited partners. Perhaps limited partners are persons that who, at the property taken such at a certain value, and such as capital so the all are not liable to the debts and other liabilities about the firm beyond such amount of this contribution. So however this form of "limited liability" has such different meaning from such like prevails in registered companies also.

(d) Conversely concerning the Capital of the partnership like such a limited partner cannot, when during the lifetime about the firm withdraw or may receive back from the firm his like contribution or any part of it there.

(e) The death or bankruptcy of a limited partner such does not cause the dissolution of that limited partnership.

(f) Likewise, the lunacy of a limited partner is like not a cause of dissolving a limited partnership perhaps unless the share of which partner cannot be separated from the assets of that firm through any other method.

(g) A limited partner has no right to participate in such firm's management. Whether he does, he will be deemed for be a "general partner" about the consequent "unlimited liability" - then in respect of transactions that he engaged in there.

The Partnership Act and the universal rules of partnership law be relevant for limited partnership so then except whether these do not agree with such the Limited Partnership Act, whenever case of rules laid down in specific latter Act over-ride those that laid down in the former there.

Posted Date: 1/30/2013 7:57:50 AM | Location : United States







Related Discussions:- Limited partnerships, Assignment Help, Ask Question on Limited partnerships, Get Answer, Expert's Help, Limited partnerships Discussions

Write discussion on Limited partnerships
Your posts are moderated
Related Questions
QUESTION Many governments around the world have sought to address the problems posed by materials on the Internet that are illegal under their offline laws, and those considered

It has been estimated that about 6,000 phoenix companies operate in Australia, costing government and the community hundreds of millions of dollars per year and impacting on indi

Remuneration:             Article 108 provides that "a managing director shall receive such remuneration (whether by way of salary plus commission or may participation in earn

Function and Powers of Chairman: In the case of National Dwellings Society v Sykes Chitty, J. stated: "It is the duty of the chairman, and his function, to preserve order,

Bazil decided to celebrate a promotion he had received at work that week by having a few alcoholic drinks on the weekend. After a few hours spent in the local pub, Bazil decided he

Hire-Purchase and Credit Sale - Sales of good A Credit sale is a sale on credit. Whether A buyer of goods may be unable for pay the price in full on once and the seller may let

Presumed Agency or from Cohabitation Whether a woman who is living with a man is deemed that  be his agent for purposes of acquire necessaries to the family; marriage is not n

What are the disadvantages of doctrine of judicial precedent? Disadvantages of doctrine of judicial precedent: • Overtime here has been a huge number of cases, makes this ve

Differences between Liquidators and receivers: There are also significant differences: (a)a liquidator has numerous statutory powers. A receiver must rely on the powers given

Gist of Lord Buckleys statement: The gist of Lord Buckley's statement, above, may be summarised as follows: The judges will not regard a transaction undertaken by a company as