Liability , Business Law and Ethics

Liability:

Liability under the section may arise on the death of a member if the death reduces the membership below the statutory minimum for the particular company and:

          (i) no transferee is registered as a new member, and

          (ii) the personal representative of the deceased member  does not elect to be registered as a member, within the prescribed six months.

It should be noted that the section limits a member's  liability to debts contracted after the six months. It does not make the member liable for any debts incurred during the six months which follow the reduction of  membership. Neither does it make a member liable for any tort committed by the company during the relevant time.

Subsection (1) of Section 109 of the Act requires a company's officers and other agents to write its name on its seal, letters, business documents and negotiable  instruments. This is to be done primarily for the benefit of third parties who might contract with a limited company without realising that it is a limited  company.

Subsection (4) of the section provides that any officer   or agent of the company who does not comply with the aforesaid statutory requirements shall be liable to a  fine not exceeding one thousand shillings, and shall further be personally liable to the holder of any bill of exchange, promissory note, cheque or order for goods which did not bear the company's correct name, unless the amount due thereon is duly paid by the company. The  imposition of personal liability on the company's agent is what is regarded, in a somewhat loose sense, as  "lifting the veil of incorporation". A probably better view would be to regard the section as a codification of the common law rule which makes an agent personally  liable under a contract which he enters into with a third party without disclosing that he is acting for a  principal. That, in effect, is what happens if a  company's agent does not comply with the statutory  requirement.

Liability under this section is illustrated by Nasau  Steam Press v Tyler & Others (7) and Penrose v Martyr  (8). In the latter case the plaintiff told the court  that she was NOT aware that the company was limited till after the bills were accepted. She had therefore been misled as to the legal status of the company. It should however be noted that the section does not require that the third party suing the company's officer should have been misled by the officer's failure to write the company's name correctly.

Posted Date: 1/12/2013 2:06:15 AM | Location : United States







Related Discussions:- Liability , Assignment Help, Ask Question on Liability , Get Answer, Expert's Help, Liability Discussions

Write discussion on Liability
Your posts are moderated
Related Questions
Explain Universal jurisdiction of criminal jurisdiction It is concerned with the application of a State's criminal jurisdiction in respect of offences committed against the int

Contents and Form of Accounts - Accounts and audit: By s.149(1), every balance sheet shall give a true and fair view of the state of affairs of the company as at the end of it

Companys objects: A company's objects are stated pursuant to the provisions of an Act of Parliament. It must therefore be deduced, for example, that a company whose object has

QUESTION 1 Evaluate the circumstances under which an employer would be justified in terminating his worker's contract of employment under the Employment Rights Act QUESTION

Recognition of disputes Recognition of disputes relates to a State not recognizing a certain dispute. However, if the whole world acknowledges a certain dispute then it is nece

Illustrate the example for Policy Convergence Suppose there are two candidates, with known positions, policy proposal p A and policy proposal p B , representing policy offers

QUESTION (a) Define the term 'contract' and explain the basic elements which constitute a valid and legally enforceable contract under the English Law (b) What do you unders

What is Legislative Lobbying Lobbying, if comes after elections, may take place either by contribution (to be used in future) or by inducting some strategic information to affe

QUESTION 1 S.38(2) and S.38(3) of the Employment Relations Act require that an employee should be given the "opportunity to answer the charge" before the employer decides to te

Objects Clause: Reasons for Stating Objects  Section 5 (1) (c) requires the memorandum of association to state the objects of the company. The section does not however indi