Liability , Business Law and Ethics

Liability:

Liability under the section may arise on the death of a member if the death reduces the membership below the statutory minimum for the particular company and:

          (i) no transferee is registered as a new member, and

          (ii) the personal representative of the deceased member  does not elect to be registered as a member, within the prescribed six months.

It should be noted that the section limits a member's  liability to debts contracted after the six months. It does not make the member liable for any debts incurred during the six months which follow the reduction of  membership. Neither does it make a member liable for any tort committed by the company during the relevant time.

Subsection (1) of Section 109 of the Act requires a company's officers and other agents to write its name on its seal, letters, business documents and negotiable  instruments. This is to be done primarily for the benefit of third parties who might contract with a limited company without realising that it is a limited  company.

Subsection (4) of the section provides that any officer   or agent of the company who does not comply with the aforesaid statutory requirements shall be liable to a  fine not exceeding one thousand shillings, and shall further be personally liable to the holder of any bill of exchange, promissory note, cheque or order for goods which did not bear the company's correct name, unless the amount due thereon is duly paid by the company. The  imposition of personal liability on the company's agent is what is regarded, in a somewhat loose sense, as  "lifting the veil of incorporation". A probably better view would be to regard the section as a codification of the common law rule which makes an agent personally  liable under a contract which he enters into with a third party without disclosing that he is acting for a  principal. That, in effect, is what happens if a  company's agent does not comply with the statutory  requirement.

Liability under this section is illustrated by Nasau  Steam Press v Tyler & Others (7) and Penrose v Martyr  (8). In the latter case the plaintiff told the court  that she was NOT aware that the company was limited till after the bills were accepted. She had therefore been misled as to the legal status of the company. It should however be noted that the section does not require that the third party suing the company's officer should have been misled by the officer's failure to write the company's name correctly.

Posted Date: 1/12/2013 2:06:15 AM | Location : United States







Related Discussions:- Liability , Assignment Help, Ask Question on Liability , Get Answer, Expert's Help, Liability Discussions

Write discussion on Liability
Your posts are moderated
Related Questions
QUESTION 1 Write in detail on the following (a) Agency shop orders and (b) Decrease from the remuneration of a worker for the employer's benefit QUESTION 2 An indust

I would like to know more about Domicile of Dependency at English Law: Married women and minors.

Misfeasance by the auditors: However it is not sufficient to describe that the frauds must have been detected whether the entries in the books had been put mutually in a way w

Direct Deliveries Limited (DDL). which is a company that specialises in selling a variety of goods to small independent retailers has grown quickly in the last three years.

Question 1: (a) Expliquez les conditions qui doivent être réunis pour la formation d'un contrat. (b) Expliquez les differentes modes selon lesquels un contrat peut prendre

Question 1: Explain the main elements that constitute a valid contract. Question 2: Explain the concepts of negligence and remoteness of damage in tort law. Questio

Benefits of non-accepting shareholders: The minority whose shares are acquired compulsory under s.210 are entitled to all the benefits included in the original offer and accep

What is the dispute resolving mechanism Obligation to follow a treaty between states arises only when it has been concluded in a written form. Moreover, a treaty must be in a

You are the HR manager of a large manufacturing company which employs both unionized and non-unionized employees. You have a non-unionized employee, Edith, who has worked for the c

Order for compulsory liquidation: The Official Receiver also calls separate meetings of creditors and of contributories within one month of the order for liquidation: s.236.