Legal justification - constructive notice, Business Law and Ethics

Legal justification - Constructive notice:

The legal justification for this rule is that since the company's public documents in its file at the Companies Registry are available there for inspection by any interested member of the public he should have gone to the Registry, asked for the Company's file, inspect the contents and, having found the memorandum of association, read the objects clause in order to ascertain whether the proposed contract is consistent with the company's objects. He would then have realised that the contract was not within the company's objects. If he fails to do so and it happens that the concluded contract was neither expressly nor impliedly within the company's objects, he will be regarded as having been aware that the contract was ultra vires. He cannot therefore be allowed to enforce it. The "constructive notice' rule may be likened to the old adage, "you can take a donkey to the river but you cannot force it to drink", but with the addition that, on your way back home, you would be entitled to tell the donkey: "Since you have simply refused to drink for no apparent reason, I will take it that you have drunk for today. I will therefore not take you to the river again today but will do so tomorrow when the drinking time comes".

There appears to be no moral justification for allowing a person contracting with a company to rely on his own inaction as the basis for instituting legal proceedings against the company. It is rather tempting to say that the law, like God, protects only those who also protect themselves.

The only plausible criticism that could be made against the constructive notice rule is its assumption that a potential contracting party who reads a company's objects will be able to make the correct legal conclusion regarding the vires of the proposed transaction, and its refusal to validate the transaction in cases where the party mistakenly believed the proposed contract to be intra vires the company.

The fact that a perusal of the company's objects clause does not guarantee its correct interpretation is amply demonstrated by a number of English cases in which judges of the High Court, having read a disputed clause, concluded that the transaction was intra vires but the decision was later on reversed by the Court of Appeal or the House of Lords. If such senior judges can differ over the vires of a particular transaction, why should an ordinary businessman, or his legal advisor, be expected to decide the matter correctly?

A close study of some of the relevant English cases pertaining to this issue, particularly the Ashbury case, seem to indicate that the decision of the higher court which finally disposed of the case was "correct" only in the sense that the higher court, being constitutionally mandated to make the final decision, also made the "correct" decision.

There seems to be no legal justification for retention of the constructive notice rule. The fact that a person intending to contract with a company read the company's objects does not guarantee that he will interpret it correctly. And there appears to be no moral justification for blaming a person for not making a decision that was beyond his technical competence to make.

Posted Date: 1/12/2013 2:36:38 AM | Location : United States







Related Discussions:- Legal justification - constructive notice, Assignment Help, Ask Question on Legal justification - constructive notice, Get Answer, Expert's Help, Legal justification - constructive notice Discussions

Write discussion on Legal justification - constructive notice
Your posts are moderated
Related Questions
APPLICATION OF THE UNWRITTEN SOURCES OF ENGLAND LAW: Conversely it is a rule of England Law that unwritten laws are to be applied subject to the provisions' that any applicabl

(a)  In Malaysia, there are many sources of written and unwritten law. Discuss the sources of unwritten law.      (b)  What are the different methods used in interpretation of s

District Magistrate's Court - Civil Jurisdiction Conversely the civil jurisdiction of the district magistrate's courts in claims not below customary law was changed through St

Prohibition:  Section 18 of the Registration of Business Names Act provides that the registration of a company's business name under the Act shall not be construed as authoris

Q. Fair Work Ombudsman options? The following are a range of potential options for the FWO to mitigate phoenix activity. These options recognise that the FWO does not currently

QUESTION 1 Discuss the sources of the Mauritian law QUESTION 2 (a) Tom, Pim and Pam enter into a lease agreement. The agreement has already been signed by Pim and Pam.

Judicial and Legislative Function of Chief Justice Judicial Function However a judge of the High Court and the court of Appeal he participates in the adjudicatory proce

A man is standing at a bar.  His friend Sam says to him, "Jim, it was Claude who scratched your car and slashed all your seats." Two days later Jim is found beaten i

Sense of Urgenc: Entrepreneurs have a never-ending sense of urgency to develop their ideas. Inactivity makes them impatient, tense, and uneasy. They thrive on activity and are tir

Registered Office Clause:                          Section 5(1) (b) provides that the memorandum of association shall state that "the registered office of the company is to be