Lack of integration in policy formulation, Microeconomics

Lack of Integration in Policy Formulation and Policy Implementation:

A common thread uniting these diverse diagnoses and prescriptions can be seen among most of the critical evaluation of various policies. Often, they seem to find little fault with the theoretical basis (like, e.g., the direct effects of taxes, public debt, public spending and indirect effects on the incentive to work, save and undertake risky entrepreneurial activities, import and/or export, etc.) and the choice of objectives, etc. Whatever limitation and drawbacks of these issues are pointed out are often rectified. For example, the high marginal tax rates have successively been brought down; many privatisation measures have been carried out, ostensibly to move the state out of the activities the private sector,  particularly the big companies, are confident of undertaking. Trade and financial opening up have scaled new heights. The main culprits they identify are the agencies, the bureaucracy, politicians, business ethics, the implementation procedures, legal and administrative framework wanting in transparency, accountability, archaic methods of financial controls, etc. which impede effective implementation of policies.  

In brief, while the theoretical framework and the mechanism of the interaction between the policy variables and the economy are usually declared appropriate and/or easily correctible, a  rather sticky and difficult terrain is encountered in the sphere of implementation. The whole understanding is predicated upon the treatment of policy formulation and implementation as two distinct processes with little common ground to extend the logic of the one to the other. On this reasoning, implementation is considered the main factor for policy failures. It seems the policy analysis proceeds on the basis of stipulating a sharp division between the policy or plan formulation and policy or plan-implementation processes. While the former is usually taken to be not much at fault, the latter is, by and large, taken to be defective. This understanding seems to be based on an incomplete non-operational, truncated comprehension of the policy processes.   

Posted Date: 11/10/2012 5:16:24 AM | Location : United States







Related Discussions:- Lack of integration in policy formulation, Assignment Help, Ask Question on Lack of integration in policy formulation, Get Answer, Expert's Help, Lack of integration in policy formulation Discussions

Write discussion on Lack of integration in policy formulation
Your posts are moderated
Related Questions
calculate demand function is Q=100-P, where Q is quantity demand and P is price


I have to make a research paper project on Investigating the buying behavior of individuals in the white goods sector and seeing if there exists any negative relationship between d

Question: (a) Long Run Incremental Cost (LRIC) is considered as the "gold standard" for setting interconnection charges. Discuss the strengths and weaknesses of the three ap

Problem 1: i) To what extent can a country actually rely on the principle of Comparative advantage before engaging in international trade? ii) Explain the different types

Frictional and Cyclical Unemployment: Frictional Unemployment: It refers to unemployment caused by changes in individual labour markets. This is the type of unemploymen

The government decides to implement a new economic stimulus package targeted at American Farmers. The stimulus package gives every household a $300 prepaid credit card that may on

Nature of Expectations in Keynes' Theory : The above discussion on the nature of expectations in Keynes' theory may be summarised as follows: 1) In forming long-term expec

in the context of managerial economics how do you explain a rational producer.illustrate giving example.

The plant cell when placed under hypertonic medium loses a great quantity of water and its cell membrane detaches from the cell wall. In that situation the cell is known as plasmol