Lack of integration in policy formulation, Microeconomics

Lack of Integration in Policy Formulation and Policy Implementation:

A common thread uniting these diverse diagnoses and prescriptions can be seen among most of the critical evaluation of various policies. Often, they seem to find little fault with the theoretical basis (like, e.g., the direct effects of taxes, public debt, public spending and indirect effects on the incentive to work, save and undertake risky entrepreneurial activities, import and/or export, etc.) and the choice of objectives, etc. Whatever limitation and drawbacks of these issues are pointed out are often rectified. For example, the high marginal tax rates have successively been brought down; many privatisation measures have been carried out, ostensibly to move the state out of the activities the private sector,  particularly the big companies, are confident of undertaking. Trade and financial opening up have scaled new heights. The main culprits they identify are the agencies, the bureaucracy, politicians, business ethics, the implementation procedures, legal and administrative framework wanting in transparency, accountability, archaic methods of financial controls, etc. which impede effective implementation of policies.  

In brief, while the theoretical framework and the mechanism of the interaction between the policy variables and the economy are usually declared appropriate and/or easily correctible, a  rather sticky and difficult terrain is encountered in the sphere of implementation. The whole understanding is predicated upon the treatment of policy formulation and implementation as two distinct processes with little common ground to extend the logic of the one to the other. On this reasoning, implementation is considered the main factor for policy failures. It seems the policy analysis proceeds on the basis of stipulating a sharp division between the policy or plan formulation and policy or plan-implementation processes. While the former is usually taken to be not much at fault, the latter is, by and large, taken to be defective. This understanding seems to be based on an incomplete non-operational, truncated comprehension of the policy processes.   

Posted Date: 11/10/2012 5:16:24 AM | Location : United States







Related Discussions:- Lack of integration in policy formulation, Assignment Help, Ask Question on Lack of integration in policy formulation, Get Answer, Expert's Help, Lack of integration in policy formulation Discussions

Write discussion on Lack of integration in policy formulation
Your posts are moderated
Related Questions
Q. Define Contribution Pensions? Defined Contribution Pensions: A pension plan which makes no specified promise about level of pension paid out after retirement. In its place,

The benefits of increased openness in trade. Narrowly defined, trade openness is lowering trade barriers - facilitating increased imports - whereas focusing on international ex

the existance of a labor marketcharacterised by perfect competition is a fallacy.discuss

what is market equilibrium and disequilibrium?

What is the formula for heat and how do you solve it?

SHORT PERIOD ANALYSIS: Short period in production refers to a time when some inputs remain fixed. A fixed input is one, whose quantity cannot be changed readily, whereas, a va

Market demand and supply of a good is shown by QB = 2,160 - 180P and QS = -2400 + 300P where QD, QS and P stand for quantity demanded, quantity supplied and price respectively. (a


Identify the four essential economic activities. The four main economic activities are: a)  resource maintenance, b)  production, c)  distribution, and d) consumpti

WHAT IS PPC