Inflation-unemployment trade-off under rational expectations, Microeconomics

Inflation-Unemployment Trade-off under Rational Expectations:

Robert Lucas (1972) pointed out another implication of the above hypothesis of adaptive expectations. Suppose in a particular period (say period 0) the unemployment rate is lower than the natural rate. Then Φ(0), the actual rate of inflation in period 0 must have been greater than Φe(0), the rate of inflation expected by workers. Now suppose that the rate of growth of nominal demand is such that over time there is a constant rate of inflation Φ(0). Then, from (5.5) it follows that for all t≥0, 

1116_InflationUnemployment Tradeoff under Rational Expectations.png

363_InflationUnemployment Tradeoff under Rational Expectations 1.png

That is, if the expected rate of inflation is less than the actual rate of inflation in mod 0 it will continue to be so in all future time periods even though the difference between the two rates converges to 0 as t->∞.

The implication is that together with a constant rate of inflation, the economy can have a rising rate of unemployment (because the difference between the actual rate of inflation and the rate of inflation expected by workers diminishes over time) but the rate of unemployment can still be lower than the natural rate in every time period (because the actual rate of inflation is always greater than the rate expected by workers). That is over the long run, together with a constant rate of inflation, the economy could still have an average rate of unemployment lower than the natural rate.

Moreover, the above solution also implies that ceteris paribus the greater the value of Φ(0), the greater would be the derivation the actual from the expected rate of inflation in any time period. Therefore, the greater would be the deviation of the actual rate of unemployment from the natural rate in any time period. Hence, the higher the constant rate of inflation in the economy, the lower would be the long-run average rate of unemployment.

This implies that while macroeconomic policy cannot achieve a constant and permanently lower rate of unemployment in an anomy by choosing a constant but permanently higher rate of Won, an inflation-unemployment trade-off still exists. By choosing a constant but permanently higher rate of inflation policy makers can still -achieve a permanently lower rate of unemployment in each period resulting in a lower long-run average rate of unemployment.

 

 

 

 

Posted Date: 11/21/2012 7:46:40 AM | Location : United States







Related Discussions:- Inflation-unemployment trade-off under rational expectations, Assignment Help, Ask Question on Inflation-unemployment trade-off under rational expectations, Get Answer, Expert's Help, Inflation-unemployment trade-off under rational expectations Discussions

Write discussion on Inflation-unemployment trade-off under rational expectations
Your posts are moderated
Related Questions
#questASSIGNMENT #1 The demand function for Product X is given by: Qdx = 80- 2Px- 0.05P²x -0.2Py + 4Pz + 0.01I+ 2A Where: Px Price of good X $120.00 Py Price of related good y $100

Summary of Demand and Supply Considerations of Education A study of supply and demand considerations in education helps in understanding four major issues and concerns of an e

Look at a recent copy of a newspaper . a. What is the top economic news story? With which of the big questions does it deal? (It must deal with at least one of them and might d

During the 1990s, technological advance reduced the cost of computer chips. Explain, with the use of supply and demand diagrams, how the following markets are affected in terms of

Explain the factors which would affect the price of a good. As there is a very long list of determinants, the basic issue is for the student to describe and illustrate how shif

TC = Q3 – 8Q2 + 68Q + 4, get the median and mode

Explain the axioms of completeness, transitivity and non-satiation using appropriate examples.

Explain the difference between elastic and fixed supply

GOOD GOVERNANCE TO ENSURE IMPLEMENTATION OF ECONOMIC POLICY:  Government is very sensitive to the expectation of the people and sincere efforts in this direction have already