Implied powers, Business Law and Ethics

Implied Powers:

                                    The statement of Lord Cairns in 1875 in Ashbury Rail Co Ltd v Riche (22) to the effect that a contract beyond the objects of the company "in the memorandum of association" is "beyond the powers" of the company gives the impression that a company has no legal power to do anything which is not written in the memorandum of association. That would be a startling proposition because, in practice, companies have to do so many things in the course of their business that if all those things were to be written down in the memorandum of association, the memorandum would be such a gigantic document that nobody would print or read. It was therefore a welcome clarification of the legal position when, in 1880, Lord Selborne, L C, stated in Attorney-General v Great Eastern Railway Co that the doctrine of ultra vires, as explained in the Ashbury case, "ought to be reasonably, and not unreasonably, understood and applied". His Lordship then explained that it is not necessary for a company to write down in its memorandum everything that it would or could do in the course of its business because whatever may fairly be regarded as incidental to, or consequential upon, those things which have been stated in the memorandum ought not, and would not, be held by the courts to be ultra vires. The courts would regard such things as impliedly within the company's powers unless they are "expressly prohibited" by the memorandum.

Posted Date: 1/12/2013 2:31:31 AM | Location : United States







Related Discussions:- Implied powers, Assignment Help, Ask Question on Implied powers, Get Answer, Expert's Help, Implied powers Discussions

Write discussion on Implied powers
Your posts are moderated
Related Questions
Bagra Used Cars Ltd. has as the most prominent show on its lot an immaculate, highly polished model which rotates slowly on a raised circular platform under powerful floodlights. T

QUESTION 1 Describe the Public Procurement Legal Framework of Mauritius QUESTION 2 Explain the following, within the meaning of the Competition Act: a. collusive agreem

Significance of Registration:           S.389 provides that "no company or association or may partnership consisting of more than twenty persons shall be formed... except it i

V alues Basic convictions or beliefs which are specific behaviors and out- comes are more desirable compare to others. Values are judgmental in which they include our ideas

The MV unfortunate was talking passengers to Lyme Cay when it receive a distress signal from a vessel nearby the master started to proceed towards the vessel but stop when he reali

Important points - Contractual Capacity of Drunken Persons Here the following points should be notice for as: Ratification Well a drunken man who enters into

Question 1: With the enactment of the Labour Act 1975, how far has the freedom of the employer to unilaterally terminate contracts of employment been abrogated? Question 2:

Stakeholders emphasised that a coordinated, whole of government approach is necessary to mitigate phoenix activity. Stakeholders also emphasised that options should recognise th

A is a Malaysian contractor in the oil and gas business. B is a large British oil exploration company. By a written Contract, B appointed A in January 2008 to maintain B's offshore

X Co. is a retail dealer of garden tractors. Mr. Y signs a contract to buy a garden tractor for $400 but later backs out of the agreement. The tractor that Y agreed to buy is subse