Implementation of material requirement planning, Mechanical Engineering

Implementation of Material Requirement Planning:

The total requirements for a material from an MRP schedule are given in the following table :

                                                                                       Week

 

2442_Implementation of MRP.png

 The annual demand for this end item is estimated to be 25,000 units over a 50 week per year schedule, or an average of 500 units per week. It costs Rs. 800 to change over the machines in the ultimate assembly department to this end item when a production lot is begun. It costs Rs. 1.10 per unit when one unit of this product must be carried in inventory from one week to another; thus, when one unit of this product is in ending inventory, it should be carried over as beginning inventory in the next week and incurs the Rs. 1.10 per unit carrying cost. Find out which of these lots sizing methods results in the least carrying and changeover (or order) costs for the eight week schedule:

1.      Lot for Lot (LFL),

2.      Economic Order Quantity (EOQ), or

3.      Period Order Quantity (POQ).

Solution

 (a)       Develop the total carrying costs over the eight week schedule for the lot-for-lot method. Lot-For-Lot (LFL) production lots equal the net requirement in each period.

 

1051_Implementation of MRP1.png

Ordering costs = Numbers of orders × 800.00 = 8 × 800.00 = 6400.00

 (b)       Develop the overall carrying costs over the eight week schedule for the EOQ lot sizing method. EOQ production lots equal the computed EOQ. First, compute the EOQ :

447_Implementation of MRP2.png

Carrying costs = total of ending inventories × 1.10 = 3266 × 1.10 = 3592.60

Ordering costs = Number of orders × 800.00 = 5 × 800.00 = 4000.00

 (c)       Develop the overall carrying costs over the eight week schedule for the POQ lot sizing method. POQ production lots equal the net requirements for POQ computed periods.

First, compute the POQ:

POQ = Number of weeks per year/ Number of order per year

=          50/(D/ EOQ) = 50/(25000/853)

= 1.706 or 2 weeks per order

 

2068_Implementation of MRP3.png

Carrying costs= sum of ending inventories × 1.10 = 2500 × 1.10 = 2750.00

Ordering costs = Number of orders × 800.00 = 4 × 800.00 = 3200.00

Among the lot sizing methods considered for this data, the POQ method exhibits the least carrying and ordering cost for the eight week net requirements schedule.

1. Where is MRP implemented?

2. Explain different lot sizing methods.

Posted Date: 2/1/2013 12:52:38 AM | Location : United States







Related Discussions:- Implementation of material requirement planning, Assignment Help, Ask Question on Implementation of material requirement planning, Get Answer, Expert's Help, Implementation of material requirement planning Discussions

Write discussion on Implementation of material requirement planning
Your posts are moderated
Related Questions
Q. Show Pneumatic Test? Pneumatic testing presents hazards that must be addressed as part of the engineering design of the pressure vessel. Due to the additional hazards of

connecting rod AB of length L support a variable compressiv force F .Drive an expression for the moment of F about the crank axis O in the term of F L r and angle

There are various refrigeration systems employing various methods. State any seven (7) refrigeration systems, mention the method(s) employed to attain low temperatures, and state a

Determine the distance of application of the load: A rigid bar of negligible weight transmits a load W to a combination of 3 springs as illustrated in Figure. The three spring

Over-Hanging and Cantilever Beam: Over-Hanging Beam: The beams on which one end or both ends are overhang are called as overhanging beam. 3. Cantilever Beam:

what is viscosity?

WHAT IS DIFFERENCE BETWEEN POROSITY AND BLOW HOLE

what is law of chemical combinations?

Q. What do you mean by Issued for Review? This drawing issue of P&IDs is a draft and is intended for the Colt-internal review process involving affected disciplines. This draw

Q. Show Corrosion Loss? Additional metal thickness must be added, to compensate for anticipated loss due to metal reacting with the environments to which it is subjected, inclu